Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2004 8:41:26 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection; newgeezer
This is not a state issue. How can one state entitle "couples" to federal benefits and another state not.
2 posted on 03/11/2004 8:45:06 AM PST by biblewonk (I must try to answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"This president doesn't have a record to run on, only a record to run from..."

Who's hiding their record, John Boy?

3 posted on 03/11/2004 8:46:26 AM PST by Howlin (Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
He who smelt it dealt it. The Leftie mayors engineered this, as did the Pink Mafia attack at the Mass. SC. This was a coordinated election year move.

However, it will work about like Elan Degenerate's comming out party did back in '96.
4 posted on 03/11/2004 8:48:26 AM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I don’t think “gay” and “wedge” should be in the same headline.
5 posted on 03/11/2004 8:50:07 AM PST by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I've talked to many of them who didn't discover their own sexuality until they were 35, 40 years old, and it wasn't because they made a choice; it was because they found out who they were

Wow. If you're 40 and you're just figuring out what you want to sleep with, you've got bigger problems than being a Democrat. I mean, repressing desires is one thing...but not even knowing what they are?

6 posted on 03/11/2004 8:51:19 AM PST by prion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Letting the states handle it themselves" might involve voting on referendums. It might involve State Legislatures. It might involve amending state constituitons.

What MA did was find 4 judges who ordered a fundamental change in the building block of civilized society. Not much state involvement there.

What with Full Faith and Credit, it's difficult to have this mean different things in different states. So a Constitutional Amendment, in which three-fourths of the States must OK it, and all the states would have some invovlements seems to fit what Kerry is asking for.

7 posted on 03/11/2004 8:53:51 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Ping


What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)


The Stamp of Normality

8 posted on 03/11/2004 8:54:20 AM PST by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Oh, its a wedge issue alright. A wedge right in between the 30% liberal whackjobs and the 70% rest of the population. But of course, this is just Bush trying to "appease his base" ... LOL!
9 posted on 03/11/2004 8:54:34 AM PST by The G Man (John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is absolutely hilarious!!!

Who started the present gay marriage controversy? President Bush, or the mayor of San Francisco?

President Bush doesn't have to use it--all he did was say where HE stood on it, which he did. And frankly, the country isn't all that divided.

Once more, Kerry makes himself look foolish.
10 posted on 03/11/2004 8:56:00 AM PST by Judith Anne (Is life a paradox? Well, yes and no...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry is the one with the hateful rhetoric and not one to talk of dividing. Nothing decent comes from Kerry.
11 posted on 03/11/2004 8:56:00 AM PST by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry is lying. He has a 100% rating from the human rights campaign. They demand homosexual marriage.

Kerry has supported homosexual marriage in the past.


Kerry also supports FEDERALIZING HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS. Doe we want to use social security to fund RECREATIONAL SEXUAL FETISHES?
Kerry is a card carrying member of the New England Liberal fringe!

IN HIS OWN WORDS::::

A Record of Working on Behalf of Gay and Lesbian Americans

With a 100% rating from the Human Rights Campaign since 1995, John Kerry is a powerful voice in the ongoing fight for civil rights for gay and lesbian Americans.

Priorities

Preventing Hate Crimes
John Kerry is an original cosponsor of the Hate Crimes Prevention bill, which would extend federal jurisdiction over serious, violent hate crimes. These would include crimes motivated by sexual orientation. Hate crimes rose a disturbing 3.5% from 1999 to 2000.

Ending Discrimination
One of John Kerry’s first acts as a U.S. Senator, in 1985, was to introduce a bill prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.  He supports passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and has adopted a nondiscrimination policy for his Congressional offices based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

HIV/AIDS Funding
John Kerry cosponsored the first Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act (CARE) - which represents the largest discretionary federal investment in treating individuals with HIV and AIDS.  Kerry also sponsored the Vaccines for the New Millennium Act, aimed at boosting contributions to the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, a non-profit group working to promote development of an HIV vaccine in 2000.  Kerry introduced the U.S. Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, TB, and Malaria Act, which would increase the U.S. government’s funding of international HIV/AIDS efforts from approximately $1.7 billion in 2003 to $1.9 billion in 2004. This effort led to the unanimous passage in May 2003 the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, TB, and Malaria Act of 2003. AIDS activists characterized Kerry as one of Congress’s top leaders on HIV/AIDS policy.

Protecting Gay and Lesbian Families
John Kerry believes that same-sex couples should be granted rights, including access to pensions, health insurance, family medical leave, bereavement leave, hospital visitation, survivor benefits, and other basic legal protections that all families and children need.  He has supported legislation to provide domestic partners of federal employees the benefits available to spouses of federal employees.  He was one of 14 Senators -- and the only one up for reelection in 1996 -- to oppose the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

Lifting the Ban on Gays in the Military
John Kerry opposed the Clinton Administration’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy”  He was one of a few senators to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee and call on the President to rescind the ban on gay and lesbian service members.

Support for Civil Unions
John Kerry supports same-sex civil unions so that gay couples can benefit from the health benefits, inheritance rights, or Social Security survivor benefits guaranteed for heterosexual couples.

>
13 posted on 03/11/2004 8:59:23 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This president doesn't have a record to run on, only a record to run from, so his campaign has already resorted to their old tricks -- attack ads and wedge politics,"

Kerry sounds like he has a brain wedgie.

14 posted on 03/11/2004 8:59:33 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry opposes same-sex marriage ... has expressed support for state-sanctioned civil unions that provide the same legal, financial, and partnership benefits that married couples receive.

Leaving the question of a constitutional amendment aside, the combination of opposing homosexual marriage and supporting civil unions that provide the same legal, financial and partnership benefits that married couples receive sits poorly with me.

It's as if the word "marriage" is worth protecting, but the institution of marriage is not. Aaaargh.

22 posted on 03/11/2004 9:09:57 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm a Christian, I've read the Bible, and I know you can find the clauses that go both ways.

What Bible is he reading from?????I'd sure like to see those clauses that "go both ways".

Man, this guy makes Clinton look honest.

23 posted on 03/11/2004 9:11:51 AM PST by Marathoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping - check comment #4, sums it up.

Dem'o'craps are criminally insane - at least ones like Kerry. When a person lies consistently for their own gain, in vilification of others, the karmic result is very bad. This guy is headed for an ignoble future.

(If someone doesn't like the word karma, just think of reaping what one sows - same reality.)

If anyone wants on/off this busy ping list, pingify me~~
35 posted on 03/11/2004 9:37:58 AM PST by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I think this is cause for concern. Our local suburban newspaper did a cover-story editorial about the Dems who are stalling a gay-marriage amendment in the Georgia legislature. They got back letter after letter (all of them supposedly local) accusing them of being "mean-spirited" or worse. I think years of brainwashing on the importance of "tolerance" and "diversity" have done much more damage than people realize.
40 posted on 03/11/2004 11:51:02 AM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
By not supporting a Constitutional amendment, Skerry Kerry IS supporting homosexual marriage (whatever that is) and unlawful judicial activism.
43 posted on 03/11/2004 11:55:58 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry says Bush using gay vows as wedge wedgie... ooooOOOooooohh....
45 posted on 03/11/2004 12:15:22 PM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I'm a Christian, I've read the Bible, and I know you can find the clauses that go both ways. I'm not here to argue that with you," Kerry said.

LOL, this guy is stupider and possessed of more hubris than Al Gore.

Who'd a thunk that was possible?

53 posted on 03/11/2004 1:28:38 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Yes, it IS a wedge issue. It separates the sheep from the goats, and the the Sodomites and Sodomite suck-ups from normal decent God-fearing people who are repelled by this perverted public spectacle.

Go ahead, Kerry, defend the Sodomites to the American people - MAKE BUSH'S DAY.
54 posted on 03/11/2004 1:31:30 PM PST by ZULU (God Bless Senator Joe McCarthy!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson