Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity Fair's April issue...on stands now.

Posted on 03/10/2004 5:30:50 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson

This is worth the $4.50 cover price, folks. Go buy it -- lots of interview quotes never before seen, including one with a Finnish hacker and a whole new rendition of the Phil Foster (Sequoia) indictment, with details from his own brother-in-law.

* * * * * *

"Strangely, another function allowed anyone with access to the GEMS central server to create minus votes. Why...would there ever be cause to record negative votes in an electronic voting machine? Later, Diebold spokesman David Bear would offer this response:

"'Yes, negative votes can be entered into GEMS. If for some reason an election administrator determines they have a need to enter negative votes, that is for them to determine, and we do not believe the system should prevent that.'"

* * * * * *

"Here was a Diebold engineer admitting that the system was not secure. Not to mention encouraging the recipient of his memo to hide information from the labs. ('We don't have another version ,' says Diebold's David Bear when asked about Clark's memo. 'I don't know what he specifically meant..')

"Who was 'Jane'? And what did he mean by saying that the Access back door got 'people' out of a bind, and that 'King County is famous for it'? Did this mean that the back door through Microsoft Access could be used to tinker with vote tallies?"

* * * * * *

"If O'Dell was guilty of poor judgment, no one could accuse him of being a criminal. The same could not be said, Andy Stephenson soon determined ... of everyone who worked for Diebold Election Systems and the company it had purchased in 2002, Texas-based G.E.S.

"One director of G.E.S., Michael K. Graye, was arrested in 1996 in Canada on tax-fraud and money-laundering charges that involved $18 million. Before he could be sentenced, he was indicted in the U.S. for stock fraud. He shuttled between prisons in New York and Ontario for 18 months, before pleading guilty in April 2003 to the tax-fraud charges in Canada.

"After Graye had left G.E.S., it operated without further taint for some time. but strangely, in 2000, G.E.S. hired Jeffrey Dean as a senior vice president, according to S.E.C. filings, despite the fact that he had served time on 23 felony counts of embezzlement involving, as a court document cites, 'a high degree of sophisticattion and planning in the use and alteration of records in the computerized accounting system that defendant maintained for the victim...

"one of Dean's realms of responsibility was King County, Washington. Was it the same King County famous for 'fancy footwork,' according to Diebold engineer Ken Clark? Almost certainly, given that this was the only King County served by Diebold machines..."

"'Now, imagine,' says Harris, 'there's only about 20 guys in Vancouver. If (G.E.S.) wanted to clean up their act, why hire another shady character? And then his friend, John Elder? At that point you've lost me.'

"Elder...is a convicted cocaine trafficker who served nearly five years in the same prison where Dean was incarcerated. Not long after Dean joined G.E.S., his fellow ex-con came aboard to oversee the printing of paper ballots and punch cards produced for several states.

* * * * * *

(and, quoting Georgia's Rob Behler):

"'They had stacks and stacks of machines on pallets that had failed, bombed out. I went down to the DeKalb County warehouse, one of the larger ones, with Greg Loe, second in charge to Diebold president Bob Urosevich, he and I together, because he wanted to see the machines. I had explained, 'Don't expect a lot--they're broke, man. They do crazy crap, and they don't do the same crazy crap twice.'

"...at the company's direction, he assembled two "SWAT" teams of five or six people each to go in vans...to debug the machines before Williams and his team got to them. 'Wherever they were headed,' Behler says, 'we'd get ahead of them and try to lower the failure rate...'"

* * * * *

"'Think of D.E.S. as a door-key system,' (Dr. Doug) Jones explains. 'Everyone who wants to use my door needs a copy of the same key.' That, he explains, is the issue of 'key management.' Other doors would need keys of their own. But not Diebold's.

"'Diebold was using the same key for every bit of encrypted code,' he marvels. 'In other words, my office-door key was being used for every door in the university!'"

(By the way, the issue of the hard-coded password and the inappropriate use of D.E.S. was FIRST exposed right here on Democratic Underground. One of the people who first posted a detailed description of this was someone I've seen posting here in the last couple days. Democratic Underground "broke" the news on this more than a month before the famous Johns Hopkins/Rice report with Avi Rubin et. al.)


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: diebold; electronicvoting; vanityfair; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2004 5:30:51 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
Negataive votes. . .sounds like the electronic version of the hanging chad.

Really rediculous; maybe we should just go back and mark X in front of candidates name.

Anything as serious as voting; to be left to individuals using a computer; is asking for big trouble -IMHO.

And of course the only people who make trouble - lie for votes, cheat for votes and just outright steal them. . .are the Demrats; so we know they will find a way and do just that.

2 posted on 03/10/2004 5:42:27 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
Negataive votes. . .sounds like the electronic version of the hanging chad.

Really rediculous; maybe we should just go back and mark X in front of candidates name.

Anything as serious as voting; to be left to individuals using a computer; is asking for big trouble -IMHO.

And of course the only people who make trouble - lie for votes, cheat for votes and just outright steal them. . .are the Demrats; so we know they will find a way and do just that.

3 posted on 03/10/2004 5:43:07 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
Negataive votes. . .sounds like the electronic version of the hanging chad.

Really rediculous; maybe we should just go back and mark X in front of candidates name.

Anything as serious as voting; to be left to individuals using a computer; is asking for big trouble -IMHO.

And of course the only people who make trouble - lie for votes, cheat for votes and just outright steal them. . .are the Demrats; so we know they will find a way and do just that.

4 posted on 03/10/2004 5:43:08 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
Careful...I am a Democrat and have worked on this issue for a long time. I am working to expose the corruptio. I also have called for the replacement of any politician that does not stand behind a Voter Verified Papaer Ballot. It is a nonpartisan issue. Dems and Repubs have lost on these machines. All it takes now is one rogue programmer. Or how about a terrorist? There are no background checks on these people. Get the magazine and read the full article.

5 posted on 03/10/2004 5:47:34 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
Fair Enough.....
6 posted on 03/10/2004 5:50:22 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
Electronic voting has been a hot topic on FR from over a year ago.

IMO, the only thing worse than electronic voting is the "paper receipt" cure. It's no cure, and is a meaningless ploy to allay fears. It has no bearing on what the machine actually will report as the vote, and the paper is meaningless for recount unless a recount entails pulling in every voter to return their slip - if they kept it at all.


7 posted on 03/10/2004 6:05:02 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seamole; Theyknow; csprof; Doctor Stochastic; boris; PetroniDE; zeugma; toupsie; Rubber Duck; ...
Ping.
8 posted on 03/10/2004 6:07:56 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
"Careful...I am a Democrat and have worked on this issue for a long time."

Well, I said. . .'Demrat'; not 'Democrat'. There IS a difference!

How much, depends on how far Left you turn. :^)

9 posted on 03/10/2004 6:12:59 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
I picked up this month's Vanity Fair. I used to subscribe to it and always looked forward to a fun read. But now you cannot turn a page without somebody saying something negative about Bush. It's almost funny.
10 posted on 03/10/2004 6:15:32 PM PST by Hildy (A kiss is the unborn child knocking at the door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
True enough.
It opens teh door to voting shenanigans that only serve to embitter and anger voters, and creates cynics.
Without honest checks and balances on the system, and people willing to blow whistles, some clever person will hack it, and we will find out just how bad this can be.
Negative votes, what a ridiculous idea, and dangerous to our country.
11 posted on 03/10/2004 6:23:55 PM PST by Darksheare (Fortune for today: The penguins are after me! The Penguins are after me! The penguins are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Hildy
You and me both........Graydon Carter has turned it into a monthly anti-Bush, anti-administration rant......this month, there are AT LEAST THREE (yes, count 'em, 3!!!!) articles dedicated to *gasp* heretofore unknown dirty Bush secrets...such as.....Sharon Bush's saga (her divorce from Neil, that rotten, Silverado-wrecking, home-wrecking Bush brother) - as if anyone cares...don't ALL Presidents have a Billy Carter and Roger Clinton in the woodpile? Do I really want to know/care about their personal lives??? NOT!!......... *gasp* the electronic voting machine saga, made more intriguing by the fact that Diebold, the machine's manufacturer, is headed by a Bush "pioneer" meaning he's raised at least $100,000 for Bush's election, and THAT FACT ALONE, gives way to deep, unmitigated suspicion of the machine's integrity.........and a tin foil hat parody of "Macbeth" (titled, guess what??????.....give up????? "Macbush"...are you rolling on the floor yet????)

I can get cheaper bird cage bottom liner by going through my neighbors recycling container. I'll glady give up my subscription...someone over at D(emocratic) U(nderground) will foam at the mouth for the opportunity to get off the "waiting" list, I'm sure.../sarcasm

13 posted on 03/10/2004 7:36:07 PM PST by soozla ("A conservative click Guerilla"-DerSpiegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I never use the word receipt! I want a Voter Verified Paper Ballot...and random audits. If these things were in place...I would have no issue with the electronic machines. But as they stand now they are unacceptable.
14 posted on 03/10/2004 11:07:29 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cricket
I am pretty left...but only on social issues. But oon this issue there is no partisanship. We must all work together to protect our Ballot. Again...all it takes is one rogue programmer. I would fight for your right to vote Republican and have it counted as cast. I am sure you would do the same for any Democrat. Of course we want our side to win...but fairly.

These machines are a major problem and we must stop them before Democracy is stolen right from under us.
15 posted on 03/10/2004 11:11:20 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
I want a Voter Verified Paper Ballot...and random audits.

No such thing as random audits. They are easy to manipulate.

16 posted on 03/10/2004 11:13:32 PM PST by Cool Guy (Why is my comment a big jumbled mess?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
Lets tattoo votes on people's foreheads...

It will make a new fashion statement
17 posted on 03/10/2004 11:16:31 PM PST by woofie ( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: soozla
Ok Lets talk about Sequoia. Sequoia has connections to the Democrats. According to Sequoia they have a 52% market share. Wonder how many Republicans are being shut out because of the Sequoia machines? We will never know because there is no paper ballot.

Again...the machines can be manipulated by 1 rogue programmer and you will never know because there is no back up ballot. Getting rid of the ballot is like saying...lets get rid of the fire escapes in a building...because well we've never had a fire.

I don't really give a ratsass who wins. What I do care about is all of our votes being counted as cast. I don't care Walden Odell is a bush pioneer. But I do care that I can show a 9 year old how to hack his election software and have done so. Johns Hopkins identified 328 security flaws in Diebolds system 26 are critical. Are you sure you want to vote on such an insecure system?

You might like to know...A right wing, Gun toting, Bush loving Republican is a staunch ally in the fight against paperless voting. His name is Jim March. Do a google on him. He is a gun lobbyst in California. He is also on the side of paper ballots. In fact, one of the members here knows and respects him.


18 posted on 03/10/2004 11:21:46 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cool Guy
Not when the machines are chose by lottery.
19 posted on 03/10/2004 11:24:41 PM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Andy_Stephenson
"These machines are a major problem and we must stop them before Democracy is stolen right from under us."

I totally agree that they should not be even considered for use; I have always thought this. Do not know how/why something as critical - vital - as a vote could be left to computer machinations; including voting on the internet. (And for that matter, nor does becoming a 'registered voter' at the Dept of Motor Vehicles lend itself to the importance of an honest vote.)

Of course, the Florida chad war gave this new impetus legs; and I would maintain that the longest of these belong to the Democrats.

Any manipulated vote is to be feared (including the heretofore popular 'dead people voting'; votes for cigarrettes, and all illegal voting MO's favored by the Dems; and now the challenge of course); and electronic voting makes any manipulation easier for the ill-intended; including that rogue.

But as you know even the 'out-of-the-box' rogue, generally favor a Democrat agenda; so while we all have good reason to fear; I would offer that at a political/personal level, Repubs have more to lose.

Despite the arguments that these computers/programs/systems are secure; this issue feels more like a train, going downhill - out of control.

20 posted on 03/11/2004 5:22:55 AM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson