Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/10/2004 3:44:34 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
For instance, she said, because of cultural and religious reasons, a U.S. male solider could not perform a body search of an Iraqi woman.

I'm still not sure where I come down on this issue. I have always tended to feel about it the way Elaine Donnelly does, and I surely have been deep in her court regarding other military issues.

This particular sentence stated as a reason why females must be in combat roles is pretty weak.

2 posted on 03/10/2004 3:59:46 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"If my child decides that's what she wants to do, fight for her country, then she should be allowed to do it," Piestewa said.

The Dims just hate it when the family of a fallen soldier won't demean the miltary. My hat is off to this lady and my prayers go out to her and her fallen daughter.

4 posted on 03/10/2004 4:20:55 AM PST by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
For instance, she said, because of cultural and religious reasons, a U.S. male solider could not perform a body search of an Iraqi woman.

A little historical research shows that victorious armies often do what they want, and do not feel held back by cultural or religious concerns of the vanquished.

I freely acknowledge that having US women avilable to search Iraqi women makes the situation less volatile. But let's not go too far and say that a US male soldier "could not" do the task.

7 posted on 03/10/2004 5:09:28 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
We still have to be PC even with a war going on. Sure would not want to hurt anyones feelings by searching some woman who may want to kill you.
8 posted on 03/10/2004 6:12:23 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
But retired Navy Capt. Lory Manning, who directs the Women in the Military Project at the Women's Research and Education Institute in Washington, said the Army "could not be doing what we're doing right now in Iraq and Afghanistan without women being there."

One of the most ignorant statements Ive ever seen! Its more like there are a great many tasks that would be more difficult with out the aid of the Iraqi civilian population, including women hirelings.
9 posted on 03/10/2004 7:15:49 AM PST by TheGunny (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Be interesting to know also what is the cost of maintaining separate ("but equal!") sleeping and toilet facilities, etc. for men and for women in Iraq.
Is the number in the thousands of dollars? Hundreds of thousands?
Tens of millions?

What exactly is the cost, in reduced military preparedness, of this little bit of social engineering?

And how come we haven't heard lately of the deaths of that other group sent to try to rescue Lynch & Piestewa?
10 posted on 03/10/2004 8:52:02 AM PST by Redbob (ultrakonservativen click-guerilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"For instance, she said, because of cultural and religious reasons, a U.S. male solider could not perform a body search of an Iraqi woman."

Let me get this straight. The reason that we have to have a high percentage of personnel who are trained to a differential lower standard of physical fitness, are not deployable into direct combat roles as the ASTP personnel during the fighting in the WWII ETO were when we needed large numbers of infantry replacements due to (God forbid) brutal and heavy losses, who encumber the logistic system with unnecessary duplication of infrastructure, and create an atmosphere of sexual tension that corrupts morale because we need BODY SEARCHERS FOR WOMEN?????

Yeah, Right.
11 posted on 03/10/2004 5:41:37 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"For instance, she said, because of cultural and religious reasons, a U.S. male solider could not perform a body search of an Iraqi woman."

Let me get this straight. The reason that we have to have a high percentage of personnel who are trained to a differential lower standard of physical fitness, are not deployable into direct combat roles as the ASTP personnel during the fighting in the WWII ETO were when we needed large numbers of infantry replacements due to (God forbid) brutal and heavy losses, who encumber the logistic system with unnecessary duplication of infrastructure, and create an atmosphere of sexual tension that corrupts morale because we need BODY SEARCHERS FOR WOMEN?????

Yeah, Right.
12 posted on 03/10/2004 5:41:59 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"For instance, she said, because of cultural and religious reasons, a U.S. male solider could not perform a body search of an Iraqi woman."

Let me get this straight. The reason that we have to have a high percentage of personnel who are trained to a differential lower standard of physical fitness, are not deployable into direct combat roles as the ASTP personnel during the fighting in the WWII ETO were when we needed large numbers of infantry replacements due to (God forbid) brutal and heavy losses, who encumber the logistic system with unnecessary duplication of infrastructure, and create an atmosphere of sexual tension that corrupts morale because we need BODY SEARCHERS FOR WOMEN?????

Yeah, Right.
13 posted on 03/10/2004 5:43:36 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson