Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio board OKs criticism of evolution
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, March 10, 2004

Posted on 03/09/2004 11:40:49 PM PST by JohnHuang2

BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS
Ohio board OKs criticism
of evolution

Decision called 'victory for common sense' over 'scientific dogmatism'


Posted: March 10, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

The Ohio State Board of Education voted 13-5 yesterday to approve a model lesson plan that takes a critical look at Darwinian evolution.

The 10th-grade biology lesson plan, called a "Critical Analysis of Evolution," was created to implement a benchmark in the state science standards that requires students to be able to "Describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory."

"The board's decision is a significant victory for students and their academic freedom to study all sides of current scientific debates over evolutionary theory," said Bruce Chapman, president of Discovery Institute, an organization that examines scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution. "It's also a victory for common sense against the scientific dogmatism of those who think evolution should be protected from any critical examination."

The lesson plan asks students to examine various debates over parts of evolutionary theory that are discussed in science journals, such as whether microevolutionary processes are sufficient to explain macroevolution, explained the Discovery Institute in a statement.

While Discovery Institute says the lesson plan does not discuss religion or alternative scientific theories such as "intelligent design," opponents of the plan claim it does. Critics say the lesson contains errors and misrepresentations, uses information from intelligent design websites and lifts concepts and inaccuracies from material published by intelligent design promoters, reported the Daytona Daily News.

Created with input from a science advisory committee that included teachers, science educators and scientists from across Ohio, the lesson plan was defended by a number of scientists in public testimony before the board yesterday, Discovery Institute said.

"Ohio's science standards and this lesson will stand as a beacon to other states as they review their own approach to how evolution is presented in the classroom," said Chapman. "This is a common-sense approach that avoids the extremes and focuses on teaching students about the scientific debates over evolution."




TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creationuts; evolution; scienceeducation
Wednesday, March 10, 2004

Quote of the Day by AntiKev

1 posted on 03/09/2004 11:40:50 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Should read "Ohio Board OKs Willful Ignorance and Scientific Illiteracy."
2 posted on 03/10/2004 12:24:43 AM PST by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
'scientific dogmatism'

A term at once oxymoronic and just plain moronic. Nothing is less dogmatic than real science.

3 posted on 03/10/2004 12:26:31 AM PST by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
It strikes me that this article says the proposed lesson calls on students to critically examine evolutionary theory in light of other contenders.

I really cannot think of anything wrong with that from either (any) perspective. I'd say the same thing about any subject. I read a recent article in one of the science/tech magazines (I forget which) about a challenge to Einstein's relativity for some super-whiz at one of our universities. It's the same issue.

4 posted on 03/10/2004 6:13:40 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: xzins
Indeed, "it is the same issue". Thanks for the ping!
6 posted on 03/10/2004 9:58:23 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The board members probably read this.
7 posted on 03/10/2004 5:30:27 PM PST by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Jack Chick? Jack Cukoo is more like it.
8 posted on 03/10/2004 6:15:00 PM PST by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
(1+1-2)x1,000,000>1 True or False.

False.

One step forward two steps back a billion times, will never be greater than 1 step. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.

That said...come let us reason together.

Physics and math give no reason for biology to exist.
Physics and math would not exist without life.

Wisdom is wonderful.
10 posted on 03/11/2004 10:05:19 AM PST by vessel (How long has your candle been burning? Only you and the light know for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson