Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Saying that it isn't porn is going to put a damper on their sales!
1 posted on 03/09/2004 11:17:46 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Redcloak
Oh really? You think my wife wouldnt mind me watching it then?

2 posted on 03/09/2004 11:20:39 PM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
From dictionary.com:

6 entries found for pornography.

por·nog·ra·phy   Audio pronunciation of "pornography" ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (pôr-ngr-f)
n.
  1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
  2. The presentation or production of this material.
  3. Lurid or sensational material: ?Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the... pornography of the era? (Morris Dickstein).


[French pornographie, from pornographe, pornographer, from Late Greek pornographos, writing about prostitutes  : porn, prostitute; see per-5 in Indo-European Roots + graphein, to write; see -graphy.]
por·nogra·pher n.
porno·graphic (pôrn-grfk) adj.
porno·graphi·cal·ly adv.

[Download or Buy Now]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

pornography

( P )  pornography: log in for this definition of pornography and other entries in Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Law, available only to Dictionary.com Premium members.

Source: Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.

pornography

\Por*nog"ra*phy\, n. [Gr. ? a harlot + -graphy.] 1. Licentious painting or literature; especially, the painting anciently employed to decorate the walls of rooms devoted to bacchanalian orgies.

2. (Med.) A treatise on prostitutes, or prostitution.

Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

pornography

n : illegal activities designed to stimulate sexual desire [syn: porno, porn]

Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

pornography



<application> Still or moving images, usually of women, in
varying states of nudity, posing or performing erotic acts
with men, women, animals, machines, or other props. Some say
it degrades women, some say it corrupts young boys (who
down-load it from the World-Wide Web or exchange it on
floppy disks). Most of it is in the form of JPEG images.
There are many sites on the World-Wide Web offering porn of
all sorts, almost always for a subscription. It is said that
these are a driving force in the evolution of new technology
and techniques for the web. Advertisments for them certainly
constitute a significant proportion of all spam. There are
even pornographic computer games, an early example being Mac
Playmate
.

Beware - many institutions, particularly universities, have
strict rules against their computers and networks being used
to transfer or store such things, and you might get corrupted.

(2002-03-08)

Source: The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, © 1993-2003 Denis Howe

pornogra
5 posted on 03/10/2004 12:15:15 AM PST by unspun (The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Saying GGW is child porno is really insipid. It is soft core porn at best.
6 posted on 03/10/2004 12:20:04 AM PST by cyborg (In die begin het God die hemel en die aarde geskape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Judges Gone Wild


8 posted on 03/10/2004 1:11:44 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak; lawgirl
Florida's child pornography law makes the depiction of "sexual conduct" illegal and defines that term to include physical contact. There was no physical contact in the video.

So, in Florida, someone can have pictures of kids as long as there is no 'physical contact' in the pictures? Huh? This is silly!

9 posted on 03/10/2004 1:13:27 AM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
So it's okay to watch/tape underage girls? Business ought to boom, eh?
10 posted on 03/10/2004 1:19:13 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Prosecutors had tried to prevent the copying on grounds the videotape showing a girl "flashing" her breasts was illegal child pornography. Florida's child pornography law makes the depiction of "sexual conduct" illegal and defines that term to include physical contact. There was no physical contact in the video.

This is a bad ruling. Would "Girls Gone Wild" be considered porn if there were only adults in it? Probably not. But underaged girls changes the whole equation, and federal law is pretty clear on that.

13 posted on 03/10/2004 1:51:03 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Bill O'Reilly is probably going to wet himself in outrage over this one...
15 posted on 03/10/2004 1:54:23 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (Democrats are the real asses of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
You think the judges might have a slightly different view of these videos if it were their daughters being taped?
16 posted on 03/10/2004 3:06:10 AM PST by phenn (http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
During Spring Break in Panama City Beach (where I am...and it's S.B. now) you will see almost as much exposed 'skin' on Front Beach Road as you'd ever expect to see in that movie.

The traffic moves at a pace slower than walking and the female occupants of the vehicles expose themselves for beads.

Hey, they claim the settlers bought Manhattan with beads, so things haven't really changed that much.

17 posted on 03/10/2004 5:57:33 AM PST by capt. norm (They are training pilots in them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
I'm from Missouri, the Show Me State..pictures???
18 posted on 03/10/2004 6:06:19 AM PST by kt56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
So, it's okay to sell videos of underage girls in various stages of undress? Oooooookay...........
19 posted on 03/10/2004 7:06:19 AM PST by atomicpossum (Fun pics in my profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
"Besides," the judge added, "she's kinda cute."

This is, I think, not good.

Dan
20 posted on 03/10/2004 7:29:27 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Florida's child pornography law makes the depiction of "sexual conduct" illegal and defines that term to include physical contact. There was no physical contact in the video.

Well, that settles that, unless you believe that judges ought to legislate from the bench.

24 posted on 03/10/2004 7:45:01 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Great! Now I can show it in class!
25 posted on 03/10/2004 7:48:57 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
A videotape of an underage girl exposing her breasts is not child pornography, a judge decided...

It's the Super Bowl half-time show.

39 posted on 03/10/2004 8:43:12 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Florida's child pornography law makes the depiction of "sexual conduct" illegal and defines that term to include physical contact. There was no physical contact in the video.

Not the judge's fault that Florida's law was poorly written. Under a strict reading of this law, and based on the facts of the case, the judge ruled correctly.

45 posted on 03/10/2004 2:22:01 PM PST by Modernman ("The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must." - Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
I think this judge will be "targeted" along with the filmmaker soon.................................

46 posted on 03/10/2004 2:24:54 PM PST by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson