[spetznaz]

Florida's child pornography law makes the depiction of "sexual conduct" illegal and defines that term to include physical contact. There was no physical contact in the video.

So, in Florida, someone can have pictures of kids as long as there is no 'physical contact' in the pictures? Huh? This is silly!

[discostu]

If all pictures of naked kids were illegal then everyone's mother would be in jail. The problem the law has always had with porn is defining with words something that doesn't lend itself to words. Where is the line between the ever popular naked baby on a rug and kiddy porn? We all know it instinctively but putting into words, words that can get people thrown in jail for a very long time, is difficult, nearly impossible.