Skip to comments.
The Pentagon's Secret Scream- Sonic devices that can inflict pain
Defense-Aerospace.com ^
| March 7, 2004
| William B. Arkin
Posted on 03/09/2004 2:33:01 PM PST by DBrow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: sbelew
Mister Video, now available live via cell phone will assure TV coverage.
43
posted on
03/09/2004 4:16:10 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
To: wildbill
Directional antenna, 'member?
44
posted on
03/09/2004 4:18:16 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
To: DBrow
Hmm...I wonder if they'd sell me one? Purely for research purposes, of course!!
45
posted on
03/09/2004 4:22:13 PM PST
by
neutrino
(Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
To: DBrow
Recordings of Barry Manillow on accordion no doubt.
46
posted on
03/09/2004 4:25:13 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: DBrow; SAMWolf; snippy_about_it; Professional Engineer
I want one of these, too!
47
posted on
03/09/2004 4:25:26 PM PST
by
Samwise
(I am going to need to be sedated before this election is over.)
To: DBrow
Last week, as I watched televised images of angry Iraqis pelting U.S. soldiers with rocks when they arrived to assist those injured in suicide bombings at mosques, I couldn't help but wonder whether the presence of a sound weapon to disperse those crowds would just escalate hostilities. Unbelievable.
48
posted on
03/09/2004 4:28:35 PM PST
by
Samwise
(I am going to need to be sedated before this election is over.)
To: Samwise
The Pentagon's Secret Scream- Sonic devices that can inflict pain Big secret, I have 3 teenagers they're been using this for years. :-)
49
posted on
03/09/2004 4:36:33 PM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Why experiment on animals with so many liberals out there?)
To: SAMWolf
LOL
50
posted on
03/09/2004 4:37:41 PM PST
by
Samwise
(I am going to need to be sedated before this election is over.)
To: alnitak
Actually, there was a French scientist work on a low frequency sound weapon after WWII. This thing would liquify internal organs and demolish buildings. It won't be long before your local police departments will get these (the devices they are supplying to the military) to handle those pesky Second Amendment demonstrators that make life so uncomfortable for politicians.
51
posted on
03/09/2004 4:43:33 PM PST
by
dljordan
To: DBrow
Think you're right about folks not being able to escape the db level. By my calculations this thing will clean your toenails whether you want that or not.
What I wonder is if it will break loose your topmost dead layer of skin?
52
posted on
03/09/2004 5:48:51 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: sbelew
About Hillary being bothered by pesky Freepers ~ she lurks here.
She's been doing that since the very beginning. I don't know if she "posts", but this is one of her favorite sites.
Can you imagine how screwy she'd be if she spent her time cruising DU? No way! She's not terminally stupid ~ evil maybe ~ well, evil, probably ~ but she knows where the analysis she'll need to deal with is on display 24/7
53
posted on
03/09/2004 5:59:37 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: GulliverSwift
The martial law limit sounds like a good idea. If the US military is issued these and there are mil-specs and all, can civil police use them without getting a posse comitatus waiver?
54
posted on
03/09/2004 6:20:22 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: Samwise
"Demonstrations" in the USA tend to be peaceful affairs, with yelling and hooting and lots of movement for sure, but in many parts of the world our troops (trained for military ops not "peacekeeping" police work) are faced with rock throwing, glass jars filled with liquid, and so forth.
That our troops have to face this when trying to help people is disgraceful.
55
posted on
03/09/2004 6:23:44 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: dljordan
It won't be long before your local
police departments will get these
You know, I don't think that will happen. As mentioned above, they probably will be considered "military" and you would need lots of clearances to use them.
In all the demonstrations I have been to or in, the police never got nasty, forceful or pushy- the crowd was well behaved (noisy and scary at times, but well behaved). I expect that the police will continue to be the same way.
When crowds burn cars, burn buildings, and advance on a line of cops or troops chanting "kill the pigs", you get a Kent State.
The Anti-globalist riots in Seattle and here and there were handled without sonic cannon or firehoses- I doubt they would have been used.
56
posted on
03/09/2004 6:33:09 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: muawiyah
About Hillary being bothered by pesky Freepers ~ she lurks here. What makes you think she lurks here? Some of her staffers might, but the queen herself?
57
posted on
03/09/2004 6:47:58 PM PST
by
Samwise
(I am going to need to be sedated before this election is over.)
To: Samwise
Back during Billzo's tour in the White House I actually got her to do things in response to posts made here.
Most of them were minor, but one involved the charge that she was preparing to steal a lot of the historic china sets. In fact, they were all crated up and ready to be moved to the intermediate facility diagonal from the White House across Pennsylvania Avenue.
Everything goes in and goes out through a single separate building over there. I presume they check for nasty stuff going in, and do inventories on the stuff going out ~ the Clintons ain't the first to try to walk off with the place you know!.
But, back to the china story. Next thing you know she'd invited the President of Italy to a state dinner. Among other things she was featuring different place settings, each from a different set of the historic china.
The china stayed in place.
Others have had the same experience.
58
posted on
03/09/2004 7:00:04 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Actually, the sound levels are not as severe as I originally thought. The posted article mentions 145 db at 500 yards, a statement that is not backed up by the contractor, General Dynamics.
GD says 120 db at 60 yards- still way loud, earmuffs won't kill all of it at that range.
145 at 500 yards would be unimaginable at 100 yards, potentially lethal.
I suspect the author just made up the numbers, not the first time some "journalist" has lied to make his point.
59
posted on
03/09/2004 7:02:17 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: muawiyah
Interesting. Thanks.
60
posted on
03/09/2004 7:21:33 PM PST
by
Samwise
(I am going to need to be sedated before this election is over.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson