Skip to comments.
NY TIMES SET TO SLAM JAYSON BLAIR 'TELL ALL'
Drudge Report ^
| March 7, 2004
Posted on 03/07/2004 8:40:57 PM PST by RWR8189
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN MAR 7, 2004 22:10:18 ET XXXXX
NY TIMES SET TO SLAM JAYSON BLAIR 'TELL ALL'
The NEW YORK TIMES is set to trash disgraced former reporter Jayson Blair's alleged tell-all account behind the journalism scandal that rocked the Old Gray Lady and forced the resignations of Executive Editor Howell Raines and Managing Editor Gerald Boyd in the Summer of '03.
"Should you believe anything written by a serial liar?" Jack Shafer, on loan from Slate.com, begins his dissection of 'Burning Down My Master's House' -- a review that is set for publication next week in the TIMES esteemed book section.
From there Shafer unleashes a barrage of insults including the assesment that "Burning Down My Master's House" is a "shoddily written and filibustering book."
"Far from solving the Jayson Blair enigma," Shafer writes, "this sloppy, padded and dishonest work only adds to his growing word count of lies."
More snippets:
"...contrition is a dish served not at all in this memoir."
"From the heights of confession, Blair rappels down Mount Excuse, blaming everybody but himself for his offenses."
"It appears that Blair has always been a thief, something 'Burning Down My Master's House' neglects to mention."
"Every con man loves his con, and few are as lucky as Blair to enshrine their version in book form."
"The Times is a flawed, human institution that deserved every brick tossed at it except this one. Jayson Blair is a confessed con man, and 'Burning Down My Master's House' is just another installment in his ongoing con."
Developing...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; drudge; jaysonblair; mymastershouse; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
03/07/2004 8:40:58 PM PST
by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
Yeahhhhhhhhhhh... and what's changed at The Gray Lady since Jayson Blair's forced depature?
2
posted on
03/07/2004 8:42:29 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: RWR8189
He probably stole someones elses book on the topic......
3
posted on
03/07/2004 8:42:40 PM PST
by
Feiny
(Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.)
To: RWR8189
I was appalled that Katie Couric had him on and interviwed him,giving him free publicity for his book.
He's a pathological liar and should be ignored.A very strange,arrogant con man.
4
posted on
03/07/2004 8:44:35 PM PST
by
Mears
To: goldstategop
The New York times has also tightened up its rules on articles using anonymous sources. Amoung other things, someone on the editorial staff must know the reporter's anonymous source. That is most excellent. Many anonymous sources are just spin artists.
5
posted on
03/07/2004 8:44:49 PM PST
by
Torie
To: RWR8189
will the times put it on their bestseller list? hmmm?
Woo hoo!
6
posted on
03/07/2004 8:48:15 PM PST
by
InvisibleChurch
(Remember, God made you special and He loves you very much!)
To: Torie
Do you really trust liberals to tell the truth? I don't think the atmosphere at the NYT has changed all that much even if they tightened a rule here and there. Its worldview is till monochromatic Democrat.
7
posted on
03/07/2004 8:49:01 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Of course The Times will remain the preeminent liberal paper of record. The issue is whether they cheat or just advocate. I think they are making reasonable efforts to cut out the cheating and the spin without full disclosure. We shall see.
8
posted on
03/07/2004 8:51:06 PM PST
by
Torie
To: goldstategop
But now they got a special team to study conservatives!
Obviously they're making strides toward being fair and balanced.
[/sarcasm]
9
posted on
03/07/2004 8:51:37 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: Torie
They cheat by omission, that is the main vehicle for liberal bias in newsprint and photo journalism with the Bush recent ad campaign being a prime example of same.
10
posted on
03/07/2004 8:53:07 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Mears
A very strange,arrogant con man....who should be in jail. Is it too late to press charges. He defrauded the TIMES out of money, that would be a good start.
11
posted on
03/07/2004 8:53:20 PM PST
by
Hildy
(A kiss is the unborn child knocking at the door.)
To: InvisibleChurch
I won't be buying it. My guess is that the NYT has a stake in this book and is trying to stir up publicity, a.k.a. The Passion of the Christ.
A book written by a liar about the liars he worked for. Big deal.
12
posted on
03/07/2004 8:55:09 PM PST
by
Kowdawg
To: jwalsh07
Ya what is covered, and what is not, and where, is the prime source of bias. Just switch back and forth between CBS news and Foxnews. It is amazing to "see" it in action. But in this day and age, with so many voices being heard, I think that it is grand. Bias is called out rapidly on the internet, and the blogs, and it is a restraining force on the rich and powerful media. America is a more perfect democracy as a result.
13
posted on
03/07/2004 8:58:01 PM PST
by
Torie
To: RWR8189
In the immortal words of Jerrold "the Hut" Nadler I paraphrase "I detect a scent of Racism". But that's just me.
To: jwalsh07
And to think a regular on NPR trashed the J'accuse on the Bush ads. I see some positive trends. But then I tend to be an optimist.
15
posted on
03/07/2004 8:59:36 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
Not yet bu we're working on it. Bloggers only appeal to bloggees.
The overwhlming majority of folk still get their news from Dan, Tom and that Canadian idiot.
16
posted on
03/07/2004 9:00:07 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: RWR8189
This is exactly what Bernard Goldberg says they will do when someone exposes them.
17
posted on
03/07/2004 9:00:41 PM PST
by
Betaille
(The city put the country back in me)
To: Torie
And to think a regular on NPR trashed the J'accuse on the Bush ads. I see some positive trends. But then I tend to be an optimist.And who might that be? Certainly not Bill Moyers. :-}
18
posted on
03/07/2004 9:01:33 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
Their is a leach back from the blogs. That was my point. One can't go too far into bias territory, without having to deal with throwback.
19
posted on
03/07/2004 9:02:40 PM PST
by
Torie
To: jwalsh07
No, not Bill Moyers. It was one of their house media critics, who took some pains to make clear he was not a Bush admirer, which made it all the more effective.
20
posted on
03/07/2004 9:04:17 PM PST
by
Torie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson