Posted on 03/07/2004 4:08:52 PM PST by FoxInSocks
JACKSON, Miss. - John Kerry on Sunday accused President Bush of "stonewalling" separate inquiries into the events leading up to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacks, as well as into the intelligence that suggested Saddam Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Kerry, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, parried complaints by members of a federal commission investigating the attacks that Bush was resisting their efforts to get documents and question witnesses.
"Why is this administration stonewalling and resisting the investigation into what happened and why we had the greatest security failure in the history of our country?" Kerry said at a hastily arranged news conference.
"The American people deserve an answer now," Kerry said. "The immediate instinct of the Republicans and this administration was to shut it down."
Telephone calls for comment from the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign were not immediately returned.
Bush has made clear that he will use his leadership after the attacks in arguing his case for a second term. He began running campaign commercials last week that include images of the destruction at the World Trade Center.
Kerry, who is moving to challenge Bush on that front, said the public deserves an answer as soon as possible about what went wrong leading up to the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
"Nothing could be more important to the American people at this moment," he said. "They need to know why we had such a failure of intelligence."
He also argued that Bush has pushed a report on potential intelligence failures back until 2005, "which just happens coincidentally to not be an election year."
Last month, Bush named a commission to "figure out why" inspectors haven't found the weapons that intelligence experts said Saddam was hiding in Iraq. He told the panel to report back by the end of March 2005.
By blocking access to information needed for one investigation and delaying the results of another, Kerry said Bush was trying to cover for political purposes any potential failures by his administration.
"They want to get it out of the way as fast as they can so the memory of Americans might be shorter," said Kerry.
At the news conference, Kerry also said he had spoken and planned to meet with vanquished presidential rivals John Edwards (news - web sites) and Howard Dean (news - web sites). Aides said they anticipated arranging a session with Dean this week, likely in Washington.
"I look forward to meeting with him," Kerry said. "We're going to discuss winning the presidency of the United States."
The meeting is potentially important because the former Vermont governor built a large fund-raising network on the Internet, and his list of potential donors could be very valuable as Kerry seeks to match Bush's fund-raising prowess.
In addition, Kerry said he will ask advisers and allies to travel to Iraq to prepare an independent assessment of the situation there. Kerry said he hadn't ruled out going himself, but "that's not on the front burner."
"I don't want any sense of politicization in that regard," said Kerry.
Kerry spoke during a four-day campaign swing through the South, and compared his campaign struggles to those of the civil rights movement on an important anniversary.
At a predominantly black church, he told supporters to brace for a wave of criticism from Bush's well-funded re-election campaign, much as civil rights marchers fought against entrenched opposition.
Kerry spoke on the 39th anniversary of the "Bloody Sunday" clash in Selma, Ala., when state troopers used tear gas and billy clubs against activists marching over the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Scenes from that episode galvanized the civil rights movement and within five months the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed.
The Democrats are treating 9/11 like it was an isolated, singular event - rather than the culmination of at least 25 years of failure to address the grave and gathering threat of terrorism.
9/11 was the wakeup call. 9/11 should have generated the necessary public support for our government to confront terrorism in a systematic and sustained way.
Sadly, that collective will to fight terrorism has already faded. This election is a clear choice between a man committed to a bold policy to stop the evil-doers and a man eager to bury our national head in the sand.
Only thing they are doing is making themseleves look UNPATRIOTIC.
If Kerry truly believes he is going to win on a "I will make the world safe for terrorists by conducting the war on terrorism with police instead of soldiers", he is insane.
Come to think of it, he is.
I don't believe the will to fight terrorism has faded.
The dialogue will be about who will best be able to win the war, and it won't even be close.
Boy have your got that right!
What is *this* all about? We are paying those guys' salaries.
Nothing to worry about here. This is a standard journalistic practice when a biased reporter wants to discredit a source. By making a phone call and waiting a minute or two for a return call which doesn't come, they can use this to hint at a coverup, or guilty behavior by the target. He can truthfully say the call wasn't "returned immediately". It's just plain old BS.
Three thousand Americans killed in one day, and the country is going to hand over the war to Mike Dukakis's Lt. Governor?
Only Martha Stewarts lawyers would take that bet.
No we don't either. And I haven't seen the American people demanding any such thing.
Everybody knows that Saddam had and used WMDs and virtually every intelligence source, including those from France, Germany, Russia, the UK and the UN ALL thought he still had them.
The only people demanding an investigation are the Dems who want to politicize it. Their idea of an investigation into Iraq and 9-11 is to have a forum they can use to make accusations against the Bush administration.
Kerry is so phony. Perhaps we should investigate him and why he made the case for military action against Saddam during the Clinton administration, and then again during this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.