Posted on 03/06/2004 11:14:49 PM PST by MaineVoter2002
The Facts Show 2.4 Million Jobs Created Under Bush
The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million jobs lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job record since before World War II, they claim. One little problem: It's not true.
Not only has there been no net loss of jobs during the Bush administration, there has been a net gain, even with the devastation of 9/11. At least 2.4 million jobs have been created since the president took office, 2 million of those in 2003. The gains more than offset the losses.
While Democrats continue to beat their election-year drums about outsourcing, manufacturing losses, unemployment and slow growth in employment, America's economy has been steadily creating jobs.
At least 366,000 jobs have been created in the last five months, over 100,000 of those in January, White House press secretary Scott McClellan has noted. And though the eight-month recession "officially" ended in November, economic indicators are surprising economists and pointing toward a take-off in the recovery.
The signs:
The 5.6 percent unemployment rate is the lowest in two years and below the average of the 1980s (7.3 percent) and '90s (5.8 percent), and still continues to drop.
The nation's economic output revealed the strongest quarterly growth in 20 years. The data for the fourth quarter of 2003 show that the civilian labor force rose by 333,000, while the number of unemployed in the labor force dropped by 575,000. Even better, the number of so-called discouraged workers declined in December.
Consumer spending grew between 4 percent and 5 percent last year, and real hourly earnings rose 1.5 percent. Real earnings have risen over the last three years.
Exports doubled to 19 percent in the fourth quarter, compared to less than 9 percent in the third.
The number of American workers is at an all-time high of 138.5 million, a level never before attained in U.S. history.
Jobless claims are 10 percent below the average of the last 25 years and still falling. Hiring indices are up, even in manufacturing. Productivity growth is extremely high.
Now the doomsayers are criticizing the validity of the unemployment rate, which at 5.6 percent does not fit their gloomy story. Faulty Counting The problem is the areas of biggest job growth are usually not even being counted at all.
Though 75 percent of jobs are created by small companies, according to the Small Business Administration, this sector's entrepreneurial activity and the jobs it creates are left out by Washington bean counters when calculating official new job numbers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does its Payroll Survey by phoning businesses to crunch the number of jobs that have been gained or lost. This is where Democrats grabbed onto their lifeline, the 2.3 million figure. Look only at the Payroll Survey, and there has been a gain of only 522,000 jobs since Bush took office.
But here's the rub. The Household Survey is used to determine the unemployment rate and accounts for those who are self-employed, and small emerging businesses that might be overlooked by the Payroll Survey. But the number of U.S. firms isn't static, and the "fixed list" used by the BLS for phoning established businesses does not reflect new entrepreneurial activity.
People are called at home and asked if they have jobs, or if they are in the market for a job. In contrast to the Payroll Survey, the Household Survey shows that 2.4 million jobs have been created so far during Bush's time in office. As Economy.com writer Haseeb Ahmed recently wrote, "something is amiss in the [Payroll] survey."
Credit Where Credit Is Due
That's not all. When doomsayers, and media spoiling for a fight in an election year, laughed at Bush's prediction of 2.6 million new jobs this year, not everyone was scoffing.
Ahmed, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and others hardly batted an eye. Greenspan said it was "probably feasible" the economy would reach the Bush administration's forecast of adding 2.6 million jobs this year, provided growth continues and the productivity rate slows to more typically levels.
"I don't think it's 'Fantasyland,'" Greenspan said. "I agree with him," said John Ryding, chief market economist at Bear Stearns. "I think that we will create 2.5 million, possibly more, jobs over the balance of the year."
Ahmed is convinced that "the revision patterns of the early-1990s recovery cycle" will be repeated. A total of 1.4 million job gains were revised upward to 2.9 million in the first 21 months after the end of the last recession, just after Bush Sr. was voted out of office.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/25/171833.shtml
If elected, will John Kerry get credit for the jobs created under the Bush administration?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Friend those degrees are not worth the paper they are written on until you actually apply them in the real world. You don't even know what you don't know yet.
Are you too touchy to recognize satirical criticism? Since Bush has been in office, he's been spending enormous amounts of our tax dollars on bloated government programs (hence, the reference to "half the jobs created for government employees"), and he's been enticing more illegal aliens to stream into America with his overtures of amnesty and other open-border concessions to Vicente Fox (hence the reference to "half the jobs going to illegals").
Was my comment an exaggeration? Yes, probably... eh, possibly... eh, hmmm, well who knows? With one out of seven Americans working for some branch of government in this country, it isn't a stretch to imagine 1.2 million new government jobs being created in a four year period under any spendthrift president. And with the almost complete abrogation of control of our borders, combined with a "do not deport" attitude, combined with an offer of amnesty... well, again it isn't difficult to imagine that the ranks of 7-9 million illegal aliens haven't swelled by another million in the past four years.
When it comes to criticizing the Dems, I guess all's fair. But don't we dare criticize "one of our own," eh? Fortunately, I'm an independent conservative so I can criticize any politician who fails to uphold the Constitution and promote conservative principles.
LOL guess I should've read the whole article, those montly jobs figures ARE bunk, like the one we heard yesterday. Telephone surveys? Puhleeeease.
If there are 138 mil working right now and that is the highest its ever been, then jobs have NOT been lost.
Heh..good wiggle work.
Unfortunately, what you say about our president is true. Despite that, I'm still voting for him because I also recognize his strong leadership and character in times when such traits are essential.
You cannot trust the nation's security to a RAT!!
Pure and Simple.
Guilty as charged.
It's getting hard to tell -- is this exaggerated sarcasm again?
Bashing-bush is easy, for that anyone can just make up the numbers. Earning a living is a bit more demanding. For those of us who need econ data to feed our families, an clear understanding of hard economic realities has to be a lot better than what someone might need for say, winning a political argument. That's why we first checked the places like BEA and BLS sites, and then faced that fact that more people are working now than ever before, and they're making better wages than ever before. Like it or not.
Then again, when we want to bash-bush we just make up numbers (ALERT: that last part was facetious).
Ditto, and "roger on the alert."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.