You asked a question that has been answered, multiple times, in this very thread. You just refuse to see the answer because you are blinded by your belief that Bush is God. There is no point in my going back and copying replies throughout this thread. Your participation in this thread should allow me to assume you are actually reading it. If you aren't, you should not be responding to people. What you do is focus on the parts of replies that do not have anything to do with the main point, to avoid having to deal with the main point.
You can't focus on the the main point of an argument because doing so will cause you to lose, or to have to confront something you can't deal with.
Arguing with your type never ends because you can't confront reality. Your approach is almost identical to Bill Clinton asking to define the meaning of "is." It is a big game for you - avoiding having to deal with the truth.
Get a clue, open your eyes and pay attention, and stop exaggerating or downplaying the remarks of others, to avoid having to confront the realities they present to you.
Sure you did. You told me to "Go back and re-read the thread." "go back and re-read the forum." etc.
My question was simple. I asked you what all the other "straws" were that you claimed "broke the camel's back" when it came to Bush's record.
If there were so many "straws" why couldn't you come up with even ONE?
This is uncalled for. I already posted that I don't agree with everything Bush does.