[Jorge]

... your question is was not a "simple" one and I did not provide you with a "laundry list" of reading assignments.

Sure you did. You told me to "Go back and re-read the thread." "go back and re-read the forum." etc.

My question was simple. I asked you what all the other "straws" were that you claimed "broke the camel's back" when it came to Bush's record.

If there were so many "straws" why couldn't you come up with even ONE?

[bluefish]

Spending like a drunken sailor.. And I already stated it, but you are too lazy to read.

[bluefish]

Sure you did. You told me to "Go back and re-read the thread." "go back and re-read the forum." etc.

Both were meant to suggest you weren't paying attention to the deBaTe, because if you had been, you wouldn't have had to ask. If in fact you were not paying attention to the arguments because you were too busy concocting ways to shift it elsewhere, it is incumbent upon you to go back and consult the recorded record. It is not incumbent upon me to repeat myself and other ad nauseum, until such time that you decide to let the statements sink in and choose to address them.

Nevertheless, I gave you your "just one," again.