Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Shiites Blame Traditional Enemies Wahhabis for Latest Atrocities
AP ^ | Mar. 6, 2004

Posted on 03/06/2004 5:44:53 AM PST by nuconvert

Some Shiites Blame Traditional Enemies Wahhabis for Latest Atrocities

Mar. 6, 2004

By Hamza Hendawi / Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Some Iraqi Shiites suspect this week's deadly bombings of pilgrims may have been the work of Wahhabis, traditional enemies who consider Shiites heretics and whose warrior ancestors often raided their holy cities during two centuries of animosity. Born on the Arabian Peninsula in the 18th century, Wahhabism is among the strictest Islamic movements and considers Muslims who do not follow its teachings to be heathens and enemies. Al-Qaida terror network leader Osama bin Laden was raised as a Wahhabi.

Shiite preacher Hazim al-Aaraji has openly accused Wahhabis and al-Qaida of carrying out Tuesday's attacks, which killed at least 181 people and wounded 553 during one of the most important Shiite holidays.

"We are not afraid of saying the truth, which is that al-Qaida and the Wahhabists are behind the attacks on Kazimiya and Karbala," Al-Aaraji said Friday in a sermon outside the Kazimiya shrine in Baghdad.

Nobody has claimed responsibility for the bombings at the Kazimiya shrine in Baghdad and in the holy city of Karbala to the south. U.S. and Iraqi officials blamed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a suspected anti-U.S. militant with ties to al-Qaida.

The Jordanian extremist allegedly wrote a letter to the al-Qaida leadership calling for attacks against Shiites to draw them into a civil war against Iraq's Sunni Arabs. Shiites comprise 60 percent of Iraq's 25 million people but were long oppressed under Saddam Hussein's Sunni-dominated regime.

Some Shiite clerics and politicians disagree that foreigners were responsible. Without producing any evidence, they point to homegrown Wahhabis, believing that followers of a creed equating Shiites with "infidels" would be capable of such violence.

"Wahhabis believe that the killing of Shiites curries favor with God," said Abbas al-Robai, editor of the Shiite weekly newspaper al-Hawza. "They are behind the attacks, but I cannot be 100 percent sure."

Iraqi Wahhabis have denied involvement in Tuesday's attacks.

In a sermon at a Baghdad mosque known to attract Wahhabi worshippers, preacher Abdel-Satar al-Janabi said, "The Sunnis are not to blame for the bombings. We appeal to clerics and honorable persons in this country to contain this sedition."

Shiites have long been a favorite target of Wahhabi warriors in Iraq, who sacked Karbala in 1801, and twice laid siege to the nearby holy city of Najaf early in the 19th century.

Ironically, the violence encouraged Shiite clerics in the two cities to convert tribesmen roaming the surrounding desert, winning useful allies against the marauding Wahhabis and gaining a majority in Iraq.

The Shiites' emphasis on imagery, their ritual beating of themselves during some religious occasions and their visits to shrines are considered "haram," or prohibited, by militant Sunni Muslims. The iconoclastic Wahhabis view them as pagan and strongly disapprove of the Shiite narrative of a disappeared 12th imam who will return one day to lead them.

Wahhabis, who take their name from founder Mohammed Abdel-Wahhab, can be found in several Muslim nations, including Iraq, Yemen and Qatar. It is the official creed of Saudi Arabia's powerful religious leadership. Bin Laden is Saudi-born.

The Wahhabis were defeated by the Ottomans in 1811, but the movement resurfaced in the 20th century when its clerics forged an alliance with the al-Saud tribal clan to create today's Saudi Arabia.

Pockets of Wahhabism reappeared in Iraq in the 1940s. Saddam tolerated the spread of the creed during his 1980-1988 war with Shiite Iran, when generous Saudi support was crucial. But some Wahhabis eventually turned against the regime and many were jailed.

The Wahhabis remain a small but significant force in Sunni strongholds in Baghdad and north and west of the capital - hotbeds of armed resistance to the U.S.-led occupation and their Iraqi allies.

Wahhabis deny that their beliefs amount to a creed, arguing that it is more of a set of teachings governing the social and economic life of Muslims. They prefer to call themselves Salafis, or emulators of the Prophet Muhammad.

"Wahhabism is a conservative, not a radical movement," said Dia'a Rashwan, an expert on Islamic movements at Cairo's al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. "But it provides a suitable environment for militancy."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaida; bombing; iraq; karbala; salafis; saudi; shiite; shiites; sunnis; wahabbis; wahhabis
A brief lesson in Wahabbism (or Wahhabism)............
1 posted on 03/06/2004 5:44:53 AM PST by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
If and when the shiites call for a Jihad on Whabbaism, we can sit back and watch the resulting bloodbath.
2 posted on 03/06/2004 5:52:38 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
It would be great if we could get a free Iran and then turn and face the Saudis and the Pakistanis. Denuke Pakistan and repartition Saudi Arabia, that wold move the WOT to the beginning of the end (and set back Chinese ambitions at least a decade or two.) Then on tho Damscus and N. Korea.
3 posted on 03/06/2004 5:57:29 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
As long as muslims stick to killing each other I don't have a huge issue.
4 posted on 03/06/2004 6:03:02 AM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Ah, if only the US would pull the rug out from under the Royals.


5 posted on 03/06/2004 10:10:06 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Ah, if only the US would pull the rug out from under the Royals.

That may have to wait until after the election. - Tom


6 posted on 03/06/2004 10:19:11 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
As long as muslims stick to killing each other I don't have a huge issue.

Even if they just argue with each other its a start. We need a tolerant faction to rise amid the islamic faith and quash the radicals and take permanent control of Islam. The war on terror would end with Islam taking control of their own radical faction.

7 posted on 03/06/2004 10:23:30 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Wahabbi, Al Quaeda.....difference?
8 posted on 03/06/2004 11:26:13 AM PST by atomicpossum (Fun pics in my profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
No theological difference. The Wahabbist monkeys teach hatred of everyone not perfectly in accord with the primitive 19th century cult of Mohammed ibne-Wahab.

The Al-Qaeda act on it.

9 posted on 03/06/2004 11:58:42 AM PST by Hamza01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I hope you're being sarcastic, swarthy. I hate the Wahabbis and the House of Saud. If I could get away with it, I'd probably kill as many of them as I could. But the House of Saud is now the one thing keeping a lid on the monster they created.

If the Saud fall, then the Bin Ladenites will retun to the Arabian peninsula in trimuph.

10 posted on 03/06/2004 12:05:17 PM PST by Hamza01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Wahhabi are strict fundamentalists but not necessarily terrorists.
11 posted on 03/06/2004 1:13:00 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
Agree
12 posted on 03/06/2004 1:14:38 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
Holy Cow!

Where does gas in the states cost that much?
13 posted on 03/06/2004 1:16:22 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Since the 1800's, the Wahhabi have gone into Iraq and torn up, vandalized and desecrated Shia's holiest sites.
14 posted on 03/06/2004 1:20:01 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
"It would be a grave calamity when the followers of this phenomenon [terrorism] use religion as a camouflage, because true Islam stands innocent from all that. Its teachings stand aloft from people who believe in violence as a course of action and sabotage as a method and bloodshed as a way of reform."

Sheikh Abdul-Rahman al-Sudais at the Grand Mosque, Mecca, Saudi Arabia (Reuters, September 28, 2001)
15 posted on 03/06/2004 1:31:33 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hamza01
NOPE. Serious. The hell with the house of Saud.
16 posted on 03/07/2004 10:18:16 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson