Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC Letter Requesting that Television Stations Pull Illegal MoveOn.org Ads
Republican National Committee ^ | March 5, 2004 | Jill Holtzman Vogel Chief Counsel

Posted on 03/05/2004 11:27:59 PM PST by Dan Zachary

March 5, 2004
Attention: Station Manager
To Whom It May Concern:

This is to inform you that the Moveon.org Voter Fund is currently airing or may be about to air advertisements on your station that violate federal election laws. Moveon.org Voter Fund is a non-federal political organization, a so-called “Section 527” organization. Such organizations are restricted in spending their money to influence federal elections, but the advertisement(s) they seek to air is to help defeat President Bush’s re-election.

As a “soft money” Section 527 organization, Moveon.org Voter Fund’s actions are in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act (collectively “the Act”) and guidance issued by the Federal Election Commission. Moveon.org could have aired these ads through its federally registered separate segregated fund, but instead chose to use illegal “soft money” in excess of the limits of federal law.

The First Amendment of our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and discussion of ideas. However, Congress has enacted laws, which were recently affirmed by the United States Supreme Court, that govern how campaign speech can be funded and conducted. Between now and November, our nation will engage in a debate that pits President Bush’s strong and steady leadership against others who seek to attack the President and engage in a vicious, negative campaign. We fully anticipate these attacks, and I write not because of the misleading allegations contained in the advertisement, which will be answered in due time, but because running this advertisement breaks the law.

As a broadcaster licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, you have a responsibility to the viewing public and to your licensing agency to refrain from complicity in any illegal activity, specifically in this case, violations of our nation’s Federal Election Laws. Since this is a third party political advertisement and not a candidate sponsored message, your station is under no obligation to broadcast this advertisement.

Moveon.org Voter Fund is Funding Its Federal Election Advertisements with Non-Federal Dollars, which is Illegal

The Moveon.org Voter Fund’s web site states that it “primarily runs ads” in Presidential ‘battleground’ states in opposition to a federal candidate - President George W. Bush. The phrase “battleground states” is a direct reference used in numerous media reports and in political strategy planning to refer to states that are viewed as key to the outcome of the 2004 Presidential election. According to press reports, Moveon.org’s purpose and motivation behind airing these advertisements is to counter the Bush campaign’s advertising and “ensure that there is a Democratic presence on the TV airwaves in key states as Bush begins to make his case for re-election.”

Under the Act, any entity that spends or raises more than $1,000 in a calendar year “for the purpose of influencing any election for federal office” must register as a federal political committee with the Commission. This is not self-selecting. Moveon.org Voter Fund’s television buy attacking or opposing a clearly identified candidate for federal office requires it to register and abide by the limits and source requirements of the Act.

The Federal Election Commission affirmed two weeks ago that any communication which “promotes, supports, attacks or opposes” a federal candidate falls under the “hard dollar” rules of the Act. AO 2003-27. The Supreme Court in McConnell v. FEC, 540 U.S. ____, 124 S.Ct. 619 at 675 n. 64, set the standard for determining whether communications that refer to a clearly identified federal candidate are for the purpose of influencing a federal election. The Federal Election Commission confirmed this by stating, “communications that promote, support, attack or oppose a clearly identified Federal candidate” have a “dramatic effect” on federal elections. AO 2003-37, at 3. Further, the Federal Election Commission said that donations in excess of the Act’s limits and prohibitions could not be used to fund this type of communication. AO 2003-37, at 9-10.

Even though the most recent Moveon.org Voter Fund reports filed with the Federal Election Commission indicate receipt of donations of $5,000 or less, these are not enough to cover the costs of Moveon.org’s ads. This means that they are paying for ads that “promote, support, attack or oppose” a federal candidate with soft money that violates the prohibitions and limitations of the Act. The Moveon.org Voter Fund has filed “electioneering communication” reports with the Commission indicating that it has received donations from individuals well in excess of the $5,000 maximum federal limit provided for in the Act. For example, the Moveon.org Voter Fund previously reported nearly $1.5 million in donations from George Soros and a $971,426.78 donation from “Steven Bing,” along with many other similar donations that violate the $5,000 limit provided by federal law. In contrast, both political parties and their respective presidential campaigns pay for all of their advertisements with funds subject to the limits and prohibitions established by the Act.

The last two years have seen a long process of campaign finance reform. Elected officials from both parties have affirmatively declared that use of non-federal funds in a federal election is illegal. Senator John Kerry (D-Massachusetts) has said that “McCain-Feingold’s goal and [its] objective, which I support, is to eliminate altogether the capacity of soft money to play the role that it does in our politics.” Senator John McCain (R-Arizona), one of the primary authors of the new campaign finance law has said, “Some groups …have recently been set up for the sole purpose of raising or spending tens of millions of dollars in soft money to influence the 2004 Presidential and congressional elections. ….This blatant end run around the campaign finance laws should not be tolerated.” Moveon.org Voter fund is one of these groups evading the new campaign finance law.

Because the advertisement(s) clearly attacks or opposes President Bush, an identified candidate for federal office, and is being broadcast in states commonly considered crucial to the outcome of this Fall’s Presidential election, the Moveon.org Voter Fund cannot use soft money for this advertising and must register with the Federal Election Commission.

As you can plainly see from the information provided above, the Moveon.org Voter Fund is illegally funding the advertisements currently airing or about to be aired on your station. Now that you have been apprised of the law to prevent further violations of federal law, we urge you to remove these advertisements from your station’s broadcast rotation.

Sincerely,

Jill Holtzman Vogel Chief Counsel


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; ads; campaignfinance; campaignlaw; cfr; demandletter; fec; kerry; moveon; moveonorg; rnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2004 11:28:00 PM PST by Dan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
Now the media will accuse the GOP of censorship and show the ads for free in their newscasts
2 posted on 03/05/2004 11:31:43 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
WOW! a spine appears!

3 posted on 03/05/2004 11:32:30 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Probably.

They'll also most likely claim it is Bush's CFR since he signed it too.

Gotta leave it to the Dems though, only they could come up with a new set of laws to take away constitutional rights while at the same time also coming up with ways to get around their own laws...
4 posted on 03/05/2004 11:33:37 PM PST by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Laws don't matter to Democrats i.e.: San Fransisco.

Now if mayor started handing out gun licenses....

5 posted on 03/05/2004 11:36:24 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary; Howlin; Liz; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog
Moveon.org Voter Fund’s actions are in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act...

Will Soros take it back?

6 posted on 03/05/2004 11:36:42 PM PST by Libloather (Charter member - VRWC - # EIB-04151982)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
I don't think so. The CFR was veto bait from the beginning and the Dems were going to use the veto in 2002 against the GOP. Regardless of opinion on CFR, it does favor the GOP in many ways. The Dems are in a real bind because the CFR is very heavily weighted in favor of "Hard money" an area the GOP wins hands down.
7 posted on 03/05/2004 11:38:23 PM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
It's about time, that they did something!I hope they put some teeth into this and if the adds are shown, Moveon gets hit and gets hit hard.
8 posted on 03/05/2004 11:40:10 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
The funding-structures and inter-relationships of all the Leftist activist groups and their agendas is documented and newsworthy.
9 posted on 03/05/2004 11:42:25 PM PST by stradivarius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
The Dems are in a real bind because the CFR is very heavily weighted in favor of "Hard money" an area the GOP wins hands down.

Having to write TV stations begging them to not air illegal ads doesn't sound like a bunch of winners to me.

Yea, CFR is a real jewel, it's working so well, something Bush and the GOP can be proud of.

10 posted on 03/05/2004 11:50:44 PM PST by lewislynn (The successful globalist employee will be the best educated, working for the lowest possible wage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
Good for the RNC. Makes me want to send some more "hard" money.
11 posted on 03/05/2004 11:53:16 PM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Yea, CFR is a real jewel, it's working so well, something Bush and the GOP can be proud of.

Oh BS. It is a new law and it is being tested. Damn guy get a grip.

12 posted on 03/05/2004 11:56:23 PM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
ping
13 posted on 03/06/2004 12:04:46 AM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: diotima
BUMP!

Herein is all the law on this issue (and the facts, to boot)!
14 posted on 03/06/2004 12:09:29 AM PST by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
....send some more "hard" money."....

Just send some to the NRA, they will know what to do with it.

15 posted on 03/06/2004 12:26:17 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"Regardless of opinion on CFR, it does favor the GOP in many ways."

Exactly. They think they can shame the GOP into backing down by claiming censorship. What a crock. These 527s will be shot down in May. In the meanwhile, Moveon.org will spend hand over fist. Then they'll be in violation and will claim ignorance. Letters like this one will provide the groundwork for some serious penalties if not some jail time.

The only thing I didn't like about this letter was the highlighting of battleground states. Obviously broadcasting in swing states have more possibility to effect the outcome but it almost makes it sound alright if the state is clearly polling for the 527s preferred candidate/party.
16 posted on 03/06/2004 12:35:25 AM PST by torchthemummy (Great Liars Need To Have Great Memories)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
Letters like this one will provide the groundwork for some serious penalties if not some jail time.

At the very least Federal Court injunctions that would in fact stop the ads altogether for the election season.

17 posted on 03/06/2004 12:37:43 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Exactly.
18 posted on 03/06/2004 1:03:30 AM PST by torchthemummy (Great Liars Need To Have Great Memories)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dan Zachary
This would form a nice basis for calling "mistrial" in case the Dems win, making Florida 2000 look like a cakewalk. In this case the charge would be that of a bought election rather than a stolen one. Soros doing a perp walk would be real sweet too.
19 posted on 03/06/2004 1:19:10 AM PST by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Having to write TV stations begging them to not air illegal ads doesn't sound like a bunch of winners to me.

True, but then the FCC stepping in and fining a station several hundreds of thousands of dollars for airing "an illegal ad" might become a concern if we take into account recent events.

I wonder if that's playing a part in the "sudden revival" of the FCC. Perhaps they were just waiting for an excuse?/Tin Foil

20 posted on 03/06/2004 2:34:28 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson