Skip to comments.
Victim's Families Press Bush to Pull 9/11 Ads (a.k.a War Protestor pops up again)
Yahoo ^
| 3/5/04
| Mark Egan
Posted on 03/05/2004 11:32:15 AM PST by rocklobster11
"MY SON WAS MURDERED ..."
Among those angered was Bob McIlvaine, who lost his son Bobby when hijacked planes destroyed the Twin Towers.
"My son was murdered on September 11th," he said. "To argue that using footage of the wreckage of the towers to further someone's political career is 'tasteful' really needs to be rejected outright, and I condemn it."
The latest anti-Bush volleys came at a news conference held by September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows. Other victims' relatives said that group was politicizing the issue and had its own political agenda.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; 911families; ads; bush; gwb2004; kerry; mediabias; peacefultomorrows; teresaheinz; teresaheinzkerry; tidesfoundation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Check out more of Bob McIlvaine's opinions from this March 2003 story:
Anti-War protestors arrested... Outside the U.S. Capitol, demonstrators Monday marched and waved signs that read "Stop the Slaughter of Innocents in Iraq" and "No Blank Check." Fifty-four protesters were arrested when they broke police lines. Three of them had relatives killed in the September 11 attacks.
"We can't simplify these world problems with evil and good. The problem is so complex, so great, and diplomacy is the only way to go," said Bob McIlvaine, whose son was killed in the attacks on New York's World Trade Center.
McIlvaine said he is certain his son would not have supported war against Iraq.
To: rocklobster11; All
Typical Democrat tactic... suppress speech you don't like instead of fighting it with a substantive response.
2
posted on
03/05/2004 11:33:55 AM PST
by
jmstein7
(Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
To: rocklobster11
This guy is a narcissitic moron if he thinks that 9/11 was a "private tragedy" reserved only for the immediate victims of 9/11. This was a national tragedy. We were all shocked. We all cried for the victims. We all prayed for their families. This guy is the one playing politics with 9/11, and it angers me.
Here's a letter to the editor I sent today to the Sacramento Bee on this topic. Feel free to use it to send a version of this to your local papers:
Dear Editor:
I have to take issue with a headline on todays front page (3/5). In reporting the furor over President Bushs campaign ads, the Bee headline stated that the ads feature stark images of Sept. 11th. First, the image (singular) lasted only half-a-second (hardly the feature of the ad), and the image was not of the destruction, per se, but of a flag lifted up within the rubble of the World Trade Center. The image spoke not of destruction, but of American resolve, renewal, unity, strength, and defiance in the face of terrorism characteristics all shown by Pres. Bushs leadership, which the Democrats would like the nation to forget.
As to the furor over the image, Debra Burlingame, who lost a brother in the 9/11 attack, said on Hardball with Chris Matthews, Those images belong to all of us. We were all attacked. Like it or not, 9/11 affected the entire nation. It is part of our history. To claim that Pres. Bush cannot refer to the 9/11 attacks in his reelection campaign would be akin to saying that Franklin Roosevelt could not mention Pearl Harbor or World War II in the campaign of 1944.
In one of America's darkest hours, President Bush provided leadership, strength, comfort, and moral clarity. The Democrats want us to forget that. I haven't forgotten. On that day, this nation was shaken to its core in a way we had not been probably since the Civil War. But we had one shining, poised, genuine beam of light guiding us during that time. That beam of light was named George W. Bush. His tears were our tears; his anger, our anger; his resolve, our resolve. He lifted us up then. So I have no intention of abandoning him, nor forgetting the leadership he has provided.
3
posted on
03/05/2004 11:37:04 AM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: rocklobster11
Another story about people that yearn to be members of the "900 club". I suppose 9/11 gave some of these poor folks the time and money they needed to feed their desire for fame and recognition.
To: rocklobster11
Someone needs to remind these survivors that they each got millions of dollars as compensation for the deaths, they did not get ownership of anything else. They are trying to use the concept in opposition to Bush. They can try but they own nothing but the gold they've already received.
5
posted on
03/05/2004 11:37:27 AM PST
by
Tacis
To: rocklobster11
Isn't everyone curious about the thought processes every time one of these family members of the victims spends any of the money received from the same USA Government?????????
6
posted on
03/05/2004 11:37:37 AM PST
by
Stormyta
To: rocklobster11
Kerry wants to have a "dialogue" with the terrorists.
The images of 911 and the pentagon and the crash in PA and the stunned faces of every single American are not what the DNC wants to contrast with Kerry's
Talking points.
7
posted on
03/05/2004 11:38:37 AM PST
by
OpusatFR
(Liberals lie because the truth would kill them all off)
To: OpusatFR
IF some one knows how to resize it please do so.
http://ronwade.freeservers.com/OldiesSa-1x1.jpg
8
posted on
03/05/2004 11:40:45 AM PST
by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
To: rocklobster11
"..using footage of the wreckage of the towers "
You have to wonder if any of these people actually saw the ads. The words tacky and insensitive were universally used to describe them.
Last night, I surfed between the ABC/NBC/CBS and the ads were covered the same way.
The ads were not shown,but, " discussed " by the anchors and correspondents.
Then images of the burning and collapsing towers were shown in the background. Since the ads were not shown, the impression the media wanted to convey,was that the ads showed graphic images of planes flying into buildings and towers collapsing.
What is tacky and insensitive is the way the families have been used and manipulated by the Democrats and their media toads.
To: jmstein7
Bush shouldn't run ads about fighting crime because some people have been crime victims. Bush shouldn't run ads about an economic recovery because it might offend someone who is still out of work or lost their job. Bush should not run an ad opposing gay marriage because it will offend gays. In other words, Bush should stay in the White House, keep his mouth shut until he is relieved of duty in January 2005.
10
posted on
03/05/2004 11:41:15 AM PST
by
Russ
To: rocklobster11
Among those angered was Bob McIlvaine, who lost his son Bobby when hijacked planes destroyed the Twin Towers..."My son was murdered on September 11th," he said. "To argue that using footage of the wreckage of the towers to further someone's political career is 'tasteful' really needs to be rejected outright, and I condemn it." Bob, you gotta realize that we live in the age of Google. So a simple search (thanks, rocklobster11) reveals that you are more than willing to politicize your son's death for your political views and agenda.
McIlvaine said he is certain his son would not have supported war against Iraq.
Shame on you.
11
posted on
03/05/2004 11:41:23 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
To: OpusatFR
Go President Bush.
Clinton did the "judiciary" thing with the terrorist which caused all of the Arab world to think America was weak and frightened.
Again, President Bush did exactly the right thing and took the war to them.
Kerry would once again paint America as weak and indicisive. Sort of like his voting record and everything uttered from his mouth from the beginning of his life.
12
posted on
03/05/2004 11:41:24 AM PST
by
OpusatFR
(Liberals lie because the truth would kill them all off)
To: rocklobster11
Check out this information, originally researched and posted by DeBug=int13, about "Peaceful Tomorrows":The real name of the outfit is September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
And from all appearances it is a fund-raising front for the Tides Center (EIN 94-3213100) of San Francisco - and "Peaceful Tomorrows" doesn't try to hide that they are affiliated on their contribute page. I know some Freepers are familiar with the Tides Center, and for those who are not, it is a non-profit organization that rakes in fairly big bucks ($63+ mill in FY 2002, which included $5+ mill in Government grants) to distribute out grants and allocations to various and sundry "social" projects and causes, with left-wing groups getting decent cuts of the action - they consistently lay out a good bit of change to anti-second amendment groups, for instance. September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows doesn't appear to be necessarily autonomous from the Tides Center. Interestingly, the P.O. box listed on the "Peaceful Tomorrows" site shares the same location address and zip in the neighborhood with such notable organizations as The New Formulation: an Anti-Authoritarian Review of Books (a biannual journal examining the value of recent publications to the development of contemporary anarchist theory and politics), Institute for Anarchist Studies, Radical Magick (an "Eclectic Ceremonial Based Magick Group"), South Asian AIDS Action, Lesbian and Gay Labor Network, Dyke Action Machine! or DAM! - not that there's anything wrong with that (in Jerry Seinfeld voice). The Fellowship of Reconciliation website that is also mentioned on "Peaceful Tomorrows" contribute page says it all - offices in Wash. DC and also San Francisco.
Though they may splash New York this and New York that all around, "Peaceful Tomorrows" is created and based in Oakland California, founded and directed by Barry Amundson and sister-in-law Kelly Campbell, with the web technical matters being handled by Steve Simitzis of Saturn5 Productions in San Francisco, which has an apparent mission statement of providing web consulting and "hosting for artists, online communities, activist organizations"
Amundson is Designer and IT manager for the San Francisco branch of Fenton Communications, a "public interest communications" company that has offices in Washington DC, New York NY and San Francisco.
They have a rather interesting list of clientele that include -
MoveOn.org
People For the American Way
Nelson Mandela - Presidential Election
Greenpeace
Ben and Jerry's
Rock the Vote (which is also a "top five" paid contractor for the Tides Center)
Can probe here for the whole listing.
Here's a bit from lengthy LA Times article about what they do and the crowd they hang with - I think the Moderators won't have a cow over this excerpt -
October 1, 2002
Operation: PeaceAntiwar movement reflects a different America than in past eras, but diverse allies keep the spirit alive.
By REED JOHNSON, TIMES STAFF WRITER
"We want to poison your mind," teases the woman with slate-colored hair outside First Baptist Church in Koreatown. Swathed in natural fibers and sporting an anti-Dubya button, she's minding a table piled high with books, pamphlets and stickers decrying the sorry state of the planet--wars, corporate malfeasance, environmental disasters-in-the-making, and so on--along with half a dozen copies of the revolutionary rabble-rousings of Chairman Mao.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
But the rally's emotional climax occurred when Kelly Campbell and Barry Amundson, members of September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, a group composed of relatives of 9/11 victims, embraced beneath a giant video screen where images of the burning twin towers had flashed by moments earlier. Barry Amundson, 32, is the brother of Craig Amundson, a 28-year-old Army multimedia specialist who was killed when the hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon; Campbell is his sister-in-law. Both were in Los Angeles to voice their conviction that the response to last year's attacks on New York and Washington shouldn't be more mangled bodies and grieving relatives.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
And over at Indymedia -
"starring" Tom Hayden, Robert Scheer, Alfre Woodard, Ramona Ripston, Medea Benjamin, Maria Elena Durazo, Rev. George Regas and Rabbi Allen Freehling.
(Interesting links on that page)
13
posted on
03/05/2004 11:45:57 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: rocklobster11
September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows is a farce as documented in another thread here. This is nothing but pseudo outrage manufactured by the DNC and MoveOn.org. They're afraid of Bush's leadership and courage following 9/11. They want to pretend 9/11 never happened and want us to forget Kerry's votes to weaken our intelligence gathering capabilities and his claim that the threat of terrorism is exaggerated.
These "Peaceful Tomorrows" people had no problem using images from 9/11 at their own rally as documented in this LA Times article... http://www.latimes.com/features/lifestyle/la-lv-peace1oct01.story
It's OK for Kerry to "exploit" 50,000 plus deaths in Vietnam in his ads? OK for FDR to "exploit" Pearl Harbor in his campaign? Come on, leftists, this is weak even for you pinheads.
14
posted on
03/05/2004 11:46:18 AM PST
by
CheezyD
To: rocklobster11
FDR: "Remember Pearl Harbor."
John Kerry: "Forget 9/11."
To: jmstein7
Typical Democrat tactic... suppress speech you don't like instead of fighting it with a substantive response.Also typical is the speech they're foaming at the mouth over is what they themselves are doing and have done.
16
posted on
03/05/2004 11:49:29 AM PST
by
fml
( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
To: Wild Irish Rogue
You have to wonder if any of these people actually saw the adsMy thoughts as well, they started immediately complaining...we would have to check their names and home states against the dates that the ads started running in each state (they started with 16 states considered to be crucial) to be sure.
To: fml
I really liked this prior comment from one of the outraged family members:
On Friday Ben-Veniste revisited the topic again, complaining to NORAD chief Maj. Gen. Craig McKinley, "Given the awareness of the terrorist use of planes as weapons, how was it that NORAD was ... not better prepared to protect against the hijacking of commercial jets?"
Ben-Veniste managed to elicit the response he was looking for, with the NORAD chief replying, "In retrospect, I would agree with your comment."
Relatives of 9/11 victims who have voiced suspicion of the Bush White House were delighted with Ben-Veniste's prosecutorial style.
Kristen Breitweiser, who became a leading advocate for creating the commission after her husband, Ronald, was killed in the World Trade Center, broke into a smile as she watched Ben-Veniste press Garvey repeatedly, Newsday said.
"They asked the exact questions we want answered," a beaming Breitweiser told the paper. "To hear someone put on the spot and possibly be held accountable is so gratifying."
Read the whole story here: Clintonistas on 9/11 Commission Hunt for Bush Cover-up
To: Wild Irish Rogue
You have to wonder if any of these people actually saw the ads. A local man here in Cary NC is one of the family members being quoted in opposition to the Bush ads. He lost his brother in the North Tower. A local talk show host, Jerry Agar, contacted him to come on the show and talk about it since he is a local man. Agar asked him if he had seen the ads and he responded "no". He is also the director the "peaceful tomorrows" group opposing Bush. Jerry asked him to have someone in the organization who has seen the ad to contact him to come on the show. Jerry has yet to be contacted by anyone.
And Rush nailed the DNC and their coaching and teaching of talking points to some of the 9/11 widows for the talk show circut.
19
posted on
03/05/2004 12:05:13 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: rocklobster11; All
20
posted on
03/05/2004 12:07:49 PM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson