Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: rockinonritalin
Just when you think this story can't get any more complicated ....
2 posted on
03/05/2004 7:13:39 AM PST by
The G Man
(John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheney '04.)
To: OXENinFLA; lainie; cyborg
Some animals are more equal ping.
3 posted on
03/05/2004 7:16:10 AM PST by
StriperSniper
(Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
To: rockinonritalin
Rush's rights are being violated - equal protection under the law.
This has been a busy Friday, and it's only mid-morning!
4 posted on
03/05/2004 7:16:31 AM PST by
mabelkitty
(If Kerry is so "electable", then why are Democrats afraid of Nader?)
To: rockinonritalin
Someone's got some splainin' to do.
5 posted on
03/05/2004 7:16:58 AM PST by
kevao
To: rockinonritalin
I don't doubt that the basics of this story are true, but you'd think that at this point Drudge would not report every detail of the lurid allegations. There is such a thing as defamation, even though the ex-judge would likely be deemed a public figure, making a case more difficult.
6 posted on
03/05/2004 7:17:00 AM PST by
BCrago66
To: rockinonritalin
Holy prescription drug follies! Talk about your oxymorons.
8 posted on
03/05/2004 7:17:32 AM PST by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a Conservative)
To: rockinonritalin
heh, heh, heh... sweet.
9 posted on
03/05/2004 7:17:57 AM PST by
steveo
(My dryer is like watching television. It's a show about wet clothes.)
To: rockinonritalin
Just when I thought things couldn't get any stranger.....
To: rockinonritalin
Oh, but these cases are totally different. I'm sure this poor judge had good reason to take these pills, unlike Rush who obviously just did it to exploit himself!!!
To: rockinonritalin
This is cute, but Drudge is making a bit more out of it than it actually appears to be.
A judge who is not involved in this case whatsoever, but happens to reside in the same jurisdiction is a pill popper. Yes, there is hypocrisy in his treatment, vis a vis Rush. However, when clicking on the headline, I was thinking that the Judge who is in charge of this case was the one guilty of oxy abuse. That would have been an entirely different animal all together.
I suspect that Palm Beach is going to quietly drop this as it is anyways.
To: rockinonritalin
Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along.
19 posted on
03/05/2004 7:27:14 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: rockinonritalin
Schwartz suffered from numerous psychological and emotional disorders, including drug dependency, anxiety, panic disorder and sleeping disorder. A guilty conscience wreaks its havoc . . .
20 posted on
03/05/2004 7:27:42 AM PST by
BraveMan
To: rockinonritalin
What goes 'round comes 'round, y'all!!!
21 posted on
03/05/2004 7:28:06 AM PST by
soozla
(BUSH/CHENEY 2004!!)
To: rockinonritalin
This whole story is just......odd
23 posted on
03/05/2004 7:29:56 AM PST by
PeteFromMontana
(The only IMPEACHED, DISBARRED President? A Democrat...remind your friends)
To: rockinonritalin
This kind of arbitrary application of the law occurs repeatedly It was prevelent in the division of the New York State agency I worked for. Individuals were disciplined depending on who you knew, what your job was, how well you were liked by the administration, etc. Unfortunately, nothing was ever done about it since lowly employees had no recourse to show the discrimination.
27 posted on
03/05/2004 7:35:52 AM PST by
mass55th
To: Mudboy Slim; sultan88; jla; Landru
PING:
"A Palm Beach Country Judge -- who operated in the same jurisdiction that is current hearing the Rush Limbaugh pill case -- was hooked on OxyContin and forced from the bench, but was never investigated if he obtained the pills legally, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal."
"He was severely addicted to prescription pain killers," an insider tells the DRUDGE REPORT. "He probably got them from a variety of sources. But unlike Rush Limbaugh, he was never prosecuted! His records do not appear to have been seized nor were his doctors offices raided. Talk about friend of the court!"
MORE....
29 posted on
03/05/2004 7:37:01 AM PST by
FBD
(...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
To: rockinonritalin
HA!!
Now is *that* rich, or what.
...& a custom-made *defense*. :o)
31 posted on
03/05/2004 7:38:39 AM PST by
Landru
(Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...
32 posted on
03/05/2004 7:39:15 AM PST by
Born Conservative
(Some mornings it just doesn't seem worth it to gnaw through the leather straps.)
To: rockinonritalin
I wonder if we'll get a look at his medical records.
36 posted on
03/05/2004 7:42:37 AM PST by
Only1choice____Freedom
(The word system implies they have done something the same way at least twice)
To: rockinonritalin
So, the 14th ammendment will put Rush on the Bench!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson