Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Orwell-ocrats Own 9-11?
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | 3/05/04 | Lowell Ponte

Posted on 03/05/2004 1:19:39 AM PST by kattracks

WHO OWNS 9-11?  AND WHO OWNS HISTORY in general, the right to evoke the past and use pieces of it in creating the present?

The first television campaign ad for President George W. Bush came under partisan attack in the Leftist media because it included a few solemn, dignified frames of devastation from the World Trade Center, destroyed by terrorists on September 11, 2001.

Among the attacking voices were fat-cat Fire Fighters Union bosses feasting on caviar in ritzy Bal Harbour, Florida, who have endorsed Democratic presidential candidate-apparent Senator John Kerry (D.-Mass.) but for no specified reason accused President Bush of “demeaning the memory” of firefighters who died on 9-11. (The real reason is clear enough – the Democrat fat-cats are exploiting these dead heroes, unable to speak for themselves, as a handy political weapon with which to beat Mr. Bush.)

NBC and its offspring networks out-hustled their rival giants in interviewing selected 9-11 victim family members who called the President’s ad “exploitation” of a tragedy.  Those carefully chosen by NBC stressed that Democratic candidate Senator John Kerry was not likewise exploitative in his campaign use of 9-11, but that Republican President Bush was.

My impression of these interviews is that NBC and a few Democratic family members were exploiting the tragedy of 9-11 to make partisan attacks against the President.

Let’s pull back the camera to see a bigger picture. Those who lost loved ones in the World Trade Center have suffered enormous pain and grief.

Some, doubtless, unconsciously blame themselves for sending loved ones off to work on 9-11 to bring home the bacon for them. Some have tried to bury their pain and guilt by forgetting….or by displacing their guilt and anger onto a President who, they prefer to believe, somehow might have prevented the terrorist attacks.

But their loved ones were not the only Americans attacked on 9-11. We ALL were attacked. Nobody should have a monopoly controlling whether and how this shattering event in our history, this rip in the fabric of our society, can be discussed. It belongs to all of us. And each of us needs to address this unresolved tragedy in our own ways.

What angers me is that the dominant Leftist networks – the ones willing to shove a female singer’s bare breast in our childrens’ faces – have become censors over 9-11 footage. They have buried it.  They will not re-air or reawaken the horror, nor will they permit others to do so.

As this column opined on February 4th about the big networks: They will broadcast Janet Jackson’s breast and dancers simulating sex acts, but they will not re-air footage of Americans jumping to their deaths from the burning World Trade Center towers on 9-11 or being ground into gory hamburger inside as those towers pancaked down into rubble.

Because such video became verboten in the establishment media, Democratic candidate John F. Kerry during the South Carolina debate... could declare that President Bush has “exaggerated” the threat terrorism poses to us. When Kerry uttered this nonsense (knowing as he does what a handful of terrorists now could do to our society and economy if armed with nerve gas or germs or a tactical nuclear weapon), Kerry’s sheep-like Democratic followers nodded in brain-dead agreement.

The media has largely succeeded into putting America to sleep with hypnosis and by blacking out information that would shock the nation out of lethargy. The Left is yet again trying to steal our political show by misdirecting our attention and by controlling what Americans are permitted to see.

The motive behind this censorship by the big three Leftist networks ABC, CBS and NBC is self-evident.  Re-airing this footage would remind Americans that we are at war, which in turn would strengthen public support for our wartime Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush.  Because the aim of all three of these networks is to defeat Mr. Bush this November, they will oppose, attack and thereby try to stifle even the tiniest reminder of 9-11 – even a few frames in a Bush campaign ad.

In George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, frail hero Winston Smith worked in the totalitarian government’s history office. His job was to re-write the official history constantly so that, no matter what happened, the record always depicted Big Brother as all-knowing, accurately prophetic and infallible.

The essence of totalitarianism, said Orwell through his fiction, is that “those who control the present control the past, and those who control the past control the future.”

This is precisely what America’s dominant Leftist networks are doing through their control of the images of the attack on America on 9-11. By making those images vanish, they have created an emotional amnesia in America that favors the election of Democratic candidate John “Forget” Kerry.

To appreciate how surreal this is, imagine that during World War II the news networks relentlessly criticized President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s war effort. Imagine that, as during Vietnam, every American casualty and family’s grief was given vast media attention, and every American mistake was played to the hilt. But at the same time, imagine that these networks controlled the only film footage of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor and refused to allow it to be shown to remind Americans why they were at war. That is what the Leftist media today is doing to President Bush and the War on Terror.

The networks doubtless would reply that they are private companies who own the footage they recorded on September 11, 2001; if they choose not to re-air this videotape that is their private property, they have that right. This is half true.

But these networks got much of that footage (while amateurs could not) because ABC, CBS and NBC with their special government-issued Press Photographer passes were allowed through police cordons. They were given those press passes so that they could provide news and information to the public, not keep it from the public. They were to be the public’s eyes as a Fourth Estate, not censors hiding and manipulating the news to serve their own special political interests.

Nor is network censorship limited to 9-11. As this column noted on January 28th, NBC is in possession of video of a young John F. Kerry on “Meet the Press” in 1971 making the most horrific false accusations against American soldiers in Vietnam and confessing that he also committed war crimes and atrocities. Why has NBC refused to re-air that footage that could discredit Kerry in the eyes of millions of Americans? 

One of these big three networks also reportedly did a videotaped interview with a young AP reporter rumored to have had a sexual affair with Kerry from 2001 to 2003.  The young woman, hiding in Africa, afterwards reportedly denied this affair. But rumor was that in this network interview she confirmed and gave details of the affair. This network has not aired the interview. It has been spiked, deep-sixed, disappeared – perhaps to help Kerry, perhaps to blackmail him at some future date.

Call me cynical, but I suspect that this young woman’s interview would have aired if it exonerated Kerry. And I suspect that any of these networks would rush to air any past interview that could damage President Bush, just as surely as how they have and will rush to suppress and conceal information that could damage Senator Kerry.

What the networks are doing is news control designed to gain a Leftist political victory this November. News control and censorship is a way of re-writing history, just like in 1984. And the history and truth they are thereby stealing belongs not to them but to you. By stealing your past, they are trying to control your future and steal your government.

And as for those loved ones who died in the terrorist attacks of 9-11, the most “demeaning” things someone can do is to erase them from our national memory, erase the history of the attack that killed them, and erase the effort to bring the terrorists who planned their murders to justice? 

All this is being done cynically in order to help elect a Democrat President this November? By their re-writing of history, Senator Kerry and his allies in the Leftist media are engaging in the most demeaning, dehumanizing, Orwellian politics imaginable.


Mr. Ponte hosts a national radio talk show Saturdays 6-9 PM Eastern Time (3-6 PM Pacific Time) and Sundays 9 PM-Midnight Eastern Time (6-9 PM Pacific Time) on the Liberty Broadcasting network (formerly TalkAmerica). Internet Audio worldwide is at LibertyBroadcasting .com. The show’s live call-in number is (888) 822-8255. A professional speaker, he is a former Roving Editor for Reader’s Digest.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ads; gwb2004; lowellponte; mediabias

1 posted on 03/05/2004 1:19:40 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Democrats want to erase 9-11 from public memory.
2 posted on 03/05/2004 1:21:48 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The first television campaign ad for President George W. Bush came under partisan attack in the Leftist media because it included a few solemn, dignified frames of devastation from the World Trade Center, . . .

The Dems seem to have a penchant for nit-picking. 16 words in a State of the Union Speech that suddenly "discredits" the entire speech (none of which have been disproven, by the way). Now, a few frames in a political ad. I've seen the ad and those few frames may consume between 1 - 2 seconds. That's IT!!!

If a few seconds of footage in a poltical ad gets them irritated, wait til Bush starts pounding on Kerry's record!! We'll hear screeching that will sound like someone is skinning a cat alive.

3 posted on 03/05/2004 1:31:19 AM PST by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
What will REALLY flip them out is once the President's campaign begins screening that carrier landing from last year.
4 posted on 03/05/2004 1:32:38 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Or the pictures of soldiers dragging Saddam out of his hole!
5 posted on 03/05/2004 1:33:59 AM PST by Fledermaus (Democrats! The party of total Anarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If I should die in a terrorist attack, and any of my relatives (or anyone else) uses my death to promote a politician who supports more terrorist attacks, I will come back and haunt them like no one has ever been haunted. Poltergeist will look like an episode of Donna Reed compared to what I'll do.
6 posted on 03/05/2004 1:44:04 AM PST by BykrBayb (Temporary tagline. Applied to State of New Jersey for permanent tagline (12/24/03).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
" Hear the good news? Choco ration went up to 20 grams a week! Doubleplusgood, eh?"
7 posted on 03/05/2004 1:58:05 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Too funny . . . and too true.

LOL!
8 posted on 03/05/2004 2:02:02 AM PST by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I just watched two women on Chrissy Matthew's show. One of these women who lost a love one, used word for word the "we are gods" party's mantra. Everything out of her mouth were the words that have been used by an evil party who really at their base could care less about protecting this nation's freedom.

While I am not the least bit surprised by anything the "we are gods" mental cases do or say.

Claiming ownership of images of an attack on America gives new meaning to the word perversion.

There is ample evidence to charge the previous administration with negligence in their refusal to protect this nation's interest.

What I saw on this show truly gives a new meaning and face to that word "evil". There was not so much as a hint that anyone else could be responsible for 9/11 than President Bush.

All the heart felt sympathy for this woman and her loss was gutted from me with her obvious political agenda. It was after all Chrissy's former boss that said "all politics were local".

This woman, whose name I refuse to know, let alone remember, stripped herself of all dignity by claiming she didn't remember who she voted for in the last election.

Obviously, none of her handlers spoke to her about retaining credibility, thus her remembrance of her love one, has been replaced with a political agenda.

What depravity frames a political party to accuse with no evidence a President with the responsibility of an attack upon this nation.
9 posted on 03/05/2004 2:08:27 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
>>The Democrats want to erase 9-11 from public memory.

They are trying to define the debate.

The proper response is to increase the 9/11 ads ten-fold and return the debate to terrorists and not gobbly-gook.
10 posted on 03/05/2004 2:21:48 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
9/11 is much more relevant to this election campaign than Viet Nam. And every time Senator Kerry says the President exaggerated the threat, the American people need to be reminded of what the "threat" actually looked like.
11 posted on 03/05/2004 2:25:33 AM PST by White Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The 'Rats are squealing because they have been stuck. This is going to get a lot worse between now and November...
12 posted on 03/05/2004 3:10:31 AM PST by bondjamesbond (John Kerry is nothing more than Ted Kennedy without a dead girl in the car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The media for some reason promotes the notion that these people have a greater moral voice than others on the topic of 9/11, and what is or isn't "dignified."

What's ironic is that the groups and causes they affiliate themselves with demonstrate a great deal less dignity than virtually all other Americans and their feelings about that day.

And in the end - despite any family loss they may have suffered - they have no greater or lesser moral voice than anyone else. All Americans suffered to one degree or another.
13 posted on 03/05/2004 3:57:10 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Now let me get this straight. First, the liberals say that President Bush is, somehow, responsible for the 9/11 attacks because "they happenned on his watch." Then they turn around and say "the terrorist threat is greatly exaggerated." Sounds like Orwellian doublethink/doublespeak to me. Doubleplusungood liberal brothers. Shame on you.
14 posted on 03/05/2004 4:35:46 AM PST by NaughtiusMaximus (Tremble in your boots bureaucrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
What boggles my mind is that the news media, in their zeal to defeat President Bush, seem to not care about the US in general. Do they not realize that the muslims do not care who they kill in America? Do they not understand that this war we are in is one to the death - of America as intended by the muslims? Kerry is profoundly unfit to be CIC of the US armed forces, he is profoundly unfit to make decisions about America's future, he has no discernible set of values that he applies consistently to public discourse as far as I can read him.

The behavior of the "mainstream" media - that also can be characterized as a direct mouthpiece for the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Party - is immoral, bordering on treasonous. Americans here need to get this message out, that this election is a referendum on our future, and that of our children and grandchildren, not only in the national defense and foreign policy arenas, but also in the cultural war that is raging and threatens to consume us all.
15 posted on 03/05/2004 5:57:05 AM PST by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
bttt, for a great read...
16 posted on 03/05/2004 7:02:57 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: astounded
If, by hook or crook, Komrade Kerry is elected, BUY GUNS AND AMMO. I have a feeling that his administration would try to disarm us. If they try, things could get REAL ugly, REAL quick.
17 posted on 03/05/2004 7:12:09 AM PST by FierceDraka (Service and Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Sure seems like it. In terms of any single other issue - deficit spending, for just one example, 9/11 didn't happen.
After nearly 80 years of more or less continual defacto control over the reins of government - House, Senate and White House - the liberal democrats are now fiscal conservatives, too. Even though the financial nerve center of both the world and the country was completely obliterated (equivalent to the CPU in a computer, say) liberal democrats insist we treat this as a law enforcement issue and toe the line when it comes to defense spending.

I suspect a great number of people in this country have absolutely no concept of reality, the social engineers have done their work well.
18 posted on 03/05/2004 7:17:56 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
'The essence of totalitarianism, said Orwell through his fiction, is that “those who control the present control the past, and those who control the past control the future.”'

Everyone on freerepublic understands what is happening in the media, but this article is very good at magnifiying and pin pointing the underlying agenda...
19 posted on 03/05/2004 7:37:59 AM PST by livesbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson