[ultima ratio]

What you've posted is a rabbi's analysis of a line in the New Testament. What you haven't done is prove that the Catholic Church has ever in two thousand years ever held the doctrine of collective guilt. That is a libel. The rabbi who wrote the article you posted is just as bigoted as you are to say so. Yet this is common received opinion among Jews apparently--all of it libelous, all of it fanning the flames of hostility between Christians and Jews. All this film has done is bring Jewish bigotry out into the open. It's been there all along--in Jewish- produced movies, in Jewish-run museum exhibits, in Jewish revisionist historians who slam the Catholic Church in book after book--but most of us never realized it was mainstream Jewish thinking. Now we see it is.

[dennisw]

What you've posted is a rabbi's analysis of a line in the New Testament. 

That Rabbi is a Christian Jew.

What you haven't done is prove that the Catholic Church has ever in two thousand years ever held the doctrine of collective guilt. 

Then how come Jews were called Christ killers for centuries? Who was promoting this? The butchers and bakers? The cooks and candle stick makers?

That is a libel. The rabbi who wrote the article you posted is just as bigoted as you are to say so.

That Rabbi is a Christian Messianic Jew. Figured I would snag you there. Zola Levitt.

[dennisw]

What you haven't done is prove that the Catholic Church has ever in two thousand years ever held the doctrine of collective guilt.

Perhaps the official party line in Rome (Vatican) was not to name Jews as Christ killers. On the lower local levels this was done all the time without reprimand and lead to pogroms and a holocausts. Why else do you think the Vatican II conclave did away with the Christ killer libel (collective guilt, persecution for all Jews) for good?