Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The Passion" too violent? The "Shroud of Turin" shows it happened!
The Diocese of Charleston ^ | March 21, 2002 | Dr. William E. Rabil

Posted on 03/04/2004 2:19:56 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife

Shroud of Turin history presented in Upstate
Retired surgeon relays his nearly 40 years of research on the Shroud of Turin

By SHEILA OJENDYK

GREENVILLE — Dr. William E. Rabil has no doubt that the Shroud of Turin is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ. Rabil, a retired general surgeon from Winston-Salem, N.C., began studying the shroud in the late 1950s and has been lecturing about it for nearly 40 years. He made two slide presentations to parishioners at St. Mary Church on March 6.

Rabil began with a brief history of the shroud. After the crucifixion, the shroud was originally hidden in Jerusalem and was thought to have been moved to Edessa (Urfa, Turkey) after Jerusalem fell to the Romans in A.D. 70. In 944, the Byzantine Imperial Army invaded Edessa to recover the shroud and brought it to Constantinople (now Istanbul). Raiders from the Fourth Crusade invaded Istanbul in 1294 and took the shroud to Europe. It is believed to have been hidden by the Knights Templar until Geoffrey DeCharney exhibited it in Liren, France, in 1353. From that point forward, its history is fully documented. The shroud was moved to Turin, Italy, in 1578 and has remained there ever since. It is kept in a silver reliquary behind bullet-proof glass inside the Chapel of the Shroud.

The shroud was first photographed in 1898 by Italian photographer Secondo Pia. His first shot was a misfire, but his second shot caused him to fall to his knees. On the negative was the "positive image of Jesus Christ." The markings on the shroud are negative images, and it took the photographic reversal of light and dark to reveal the positive image of a man's body.

While the evidence cannot prove conclusively that the image on the shroud is Jesus, it is definitely the image of man between 5 feet 11 inches and 6 feet tall who weighed approximately 175 pounds. Forensic medical investigation confirms that the man died from crucifixion.

The body in the shroud was unclothed. All four books of the Gospel tell of Roman soldiers casting lots for Jesus' garments.

The shroud was not wrapped around the body, as one might expect. The body was placed on top of the shroud with the feet at one end. The other end of the shroud was brought over the head and spread on top of the body, ending at the feet.

Jesus' torture and crucifixion were much bloodier than most paintings have ever depicted. The back of the body in the shroud shows multiple scourge marks from the nape of the neck to the feet. The Romans used a flagrum for scourging. A flagrum was a whip with bone or metal-tipped leather thongs that was specifically designed to tear flesh. One-hundred twenty scourge marks were counted on the body.

Blood had not been washed from the body in the shroud. The Sabbath was fast approaching when Jesus was taken down from the cross, and he had to be buried before sundown. The doctor emphasized that Jesus' body would have gone into rigor mortis almost immediately after death because of the trauma of crucifixion, which would have made washing very difficult. Jewish burial practices also precluded washing blood that was flowing at the time of death.

The face shows bruising on the nose; Jesus was struck on the nose by a high priest. The body had a mustache and beard, and there is evidence that facial hair had been plucked.

There were no broken bones, but some bones were displaced. There is evidence of spike wounds to both wrists and the feet. Forensic investigators have proved that the spikes were not pounded into Jesus' palms because the weight of an adult would have torn completely through all tissues, and he would have fallen off the cross. The spikes were pounded into his wrists, and the bones separated. One foot was nailed over the other.

According to Dr. John Heller in his book, Report on the Shroud of Turin (Houghton Mifflin Co., 1983), "There is a swelling of both shoulders, with abrasions indicating something heavy and rough had been carried across the man's shoulders within hours of death."

There is no pigment on the linen cloth of the shroud. If paint had been used, the wound pattern would have become obliterated. The blood stains on the back of the skull demonstrate the unique cohesive properties of blood. No other substance behaves the same way. Scientific testing has confirmed that the stains are blood and body fluids.

The forensic examination shows that the crown of thorns was actually a cap over the entire scalp. A painting done from the shroud image shows a thorn above Jesus' right eye.

Some photos of the shroud show the image of coins placed over both eyes, a Jewish burial custom. The image exactly matches that of a coin minted during the reign of Pontius Pilate between A.D. 29 and 33.

Botanical experts have examined fragments of the shroud and found spores and seeds from 27 plants that are indigenous to Jerusalem. Geological analysis of particles showed limestone indigenous to caves surrounding Jerusalem and suggested that the shroud was placed in a damp tomb or cave.

Jesus died after about three hours on the cross, which was considered fast for a man of his age and physical condition. Medical experts theorize that he was severely weakened by the brutal scourging. Death by crucifixion is very painful. The muscles of the arms, chest, and legs quickly go into spasm, and the victim dies of asphyxiation.

The shroud has been studied and tested carefully by surgeons, forensic scientists, nuclear scientists, radiologists, Biblical scholars, botanists, and historians. Experts have disagreed with each other and challenged each other's theories and tests. Nobody will ever prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus Christ — but nobody can prove it wasn't either.

(Excerpt) Read more at catholic-doc.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; facts; medievalhoax; shroudofturin; sudariumofoviedo; thepassion; truth; veronicaveil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 next last
To: 1Old Pro
On the next ping I send you, on the link to the Shroud you will see the markings on the face on Jesus's nose. :o(

Yeah, Those liberals would feel sorry for all those who beat Him up. But then, Jesus forgave them, so.. so must I!

I didn't really notice all the hooked noses the critics talked about either. Except Peter had a big bump on his. But what an awesome Actor he was!! :o)

201 posted on 03/05/2004 4:57:24 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: dangus; shield
You're right dangus!

There was both the Shroud and the Sudarium!! tvn from here at FR told me about the hankie type face cloth just today!! But both the Shroud (Linen type cloth that the body was laid upon, which was then draped over the body) and the face "hankie" were used. Read this link:

http://www.shroudstory.com/sudarium.htm

"The Passion of The Christ" movie has been a blessing in more ways than ONE!!
202 posted on 03/05/2004 5:01:37 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: happydogdesign; dangus; annyokie; Budge; Internet Golfer; wirestripper; madison10; Sloth; ...
Here is a link where you will see the face of Jesus on "The Shroud of Turin". It is so clear. But sadly, It is also an alarming link, as it tells what bad shape the Shroud is in right now. (Sorry if I PING anyone twice or more. I'm trying to ping anyone I think will be interested).

http://www.shroud.com/restored.htm#dreisbach

I found the link because someone tried to debunk the Shroud of Turin. That naysayer led to many more positive links than negative ones regarding the Shroud! There are always naysayers in life, but "good" can come from even their negativity. :o)

HOWEVER, there is VERY "recent" and "not very good" news on how "The Shroud of Turin" is being taken care of!!

I don't believe it's "intentional".... just horribly "misguided". It is however "heartbreaking" and even "SHOCKING". I think those who understand "preservation and restoration methods" will be as shocked as I am.

For those Christians who are interested in this "HOLY GARMENT" pay particular attention to "Comments on the Shroud "Restoration" by William Meacham". The other scientists in this link are equally alarmed regarding it's care. Meacham has links where you can go view clips of the Shroud being examined.

Look here: http://www.hku.hk/hkprehis/shrdvid2.htm CLICK ON THE PICTURES AFTER THEY LOAD (you will need DSL or CABLE) (The first picture shows them scraping away burns, when they should have cut them away and saved the clippings. The second video shows "bare hands" sewing. All the while mixing their DNA with that on the Shroud and spreading DNA everywhere. The Third video shows bright lights on, while a Priest talks. Lighting can be very damaging to old linen. And I guess this recent "restoration" took a month. They say the Shroud looks darker :o(

They vaccumed up stuff, were scraping material...and well, I guess you'll need to read the link. I'm pretty upset myself after reading this. We need to "pray" that the Shroud is taken care of better than this. Like I said, .. the caretakers were just terribly misguided. But we need for it to be cared for better than this! I was so disheartened while studying the links and watching the video's!!!

I'm extremely worried about the preservation of this Sacred Garment. Many PRAYERS are needed!!

LASTLY,.. LET ME ADD,.. I THINK THIS IS A TIME FOR ALL "CHRISTIANS" TO COME TOGETHER!!! It is NOT a time to blame the Catholic Church for their care of the Shroud, or anything like that. There is so much EVIL going on, that we TRULY MUST UNITE. (If that isn't OBVIOUS I honestly don't know what is). GAY MARRIAGES, BREASTS BEING EXPOSED, BABIES BEING MURDERED.. so please, lets keep this debate civil.. I implore everyone!

That so MANY Christians have UNITED AGAINST EVIL and for this movie "THE Passion of The Christ" is wonderful!! Let us continue in that vein! But also let us pray for this HOLY GARMENT!!

The Scientist on the above link state that this was all done to try to "preserve" the Shroud. The Church just treated it "Like an Antique Table Linen" (though a terribly misguided and un-educated decision, in all the Scientists opinions, I REPEAT it was NOT done in malice.. the Catholic Church would NOT do that! I'm NOT Catholic, but even I know that!!). The Scientists are not pleased as you will see. The intelligentsia in the Scientific Community are just sick over this!!

I must say, after reading this article, having a close friend with a PHD in Archeology, and having a deep interest in this field, watching documentary's and being hugely interested in all this (but admittedly having limited knowledge).. I am deeply concerned with the treatment the Shroud is getting. After all,.. IMO, this is the Burial Cloth of Jesus Christ!!

The Catholic Church must allow EXPERTS from the Scientific Community to have more input into the FUTURE of the Shroud. I am not saying we want OTHERS TO TOUCH IT OR TO TAKE CARE OF IT.. just to DECIDE HOW IT "IS" DONE!!

To lose this Garment, after it surviving for all these hundreds of decades would be a HUGE tragedy!! Here is the link again:

http://www.shroud.com/restored.htm#dreisbach

It is apparent there was a VAST Scientific community of Scholars that were "IN PLACE" available, waiting, and there to advise the Church on this "well in advance" and have been for MANY YEARS! In fact, they had all met just prior to this RECENT restoration!!

Sadly, they church went ahead with this "ill advised" restoration anyway (They mis-interpreted the advice of a deceased scientist). We do need to write to the Vatican and voice our displeasure to them! We can't sit silent when it is of such great importance! (Is there anything MORE important to Christians?) I'm so hurt and dis-heartened!

Anyway.....

For those who didn't believe the Shroud was real, BESIDES reading the links above, here's something else to read.

Here's an excerpt from the CRC on the work the STURP team:

"Professor Morano, of the electronic Microscope Centre of Vercelli and of the Institute of Pathological Anatomy of Turin, is the first to have studied the ultrastructural aspects of a thread of the Shroud by means of an electronic scanning microscope. Progress on the classical electronic transmitting microscope has been considerable. This quite recent technique consists in exploring the sample by means of an electronic beam focused on a very limited point and scanning it according to a trajectory like that used for a television picture.

Now an examination, carried out in this three-dimensional perspective, on a thread of linen a hundred years old shows flattened and completely smooth fibres, whereas the fibres from a thread of the Shroud show a cylindrical and dirty ("sporco") aspect, encrusted with every sort of foreign body: spores, pollen grains.... exactly like the fibres of a two thousand year old cloth shrouding an Egyptian mummy in the Egyptian Museum of Turin. A further decisive proof of the Shroud's authenticity."


Also from the CRC: THE DATING OF THE IMAGE BY MEANS OF PALEOGRAPHY THE IMAGE DATED TO WITHIN TWO YEARS

Our historical investigation finds striking confirmation through paleography, which dates the image to within two years. Our late lamented friend, Father Filas, sent us the complete file of this discovery, which, to his credit, he brought to completion though not having initiated it himself. This fact needs to be recalled, for it all began with a consensus of American scientists, vouched for by the preliminary work of the STURP team at Albuquerque in 1977 and by Jumper's communication to the Congress of Turin in 1978. But it all ended in such a persecution of Father Filas starting from the meeting at Los Alamos in 1979, that to this day his file is as good as banned worldwide.

Why? For one reason only, which is totally alien to science: because we have here a dating of the image, and not just of the cloth, dating it to almost the actual year of the Event itself. It is the stamp or seal of Pontius Pilate, giving a date to which no scientist can raise any objection.

PILATE'S LEPTON It is the three-dimensional analysis which gave birth to this hypothesis, but even a look at an ordinary photograph will clearly reveal a kind of disc placed over each eyelid, dark on the positive and light on the negative. An enlargement of this imprint, on the right eyelid, enabled Father Filas to recognize the imprint of a coin struck under Pontius Pilate: the same size, same cut, the same effigy, the astrologer's staff, the same inscription recognizable, from four quite legible letters, as a certain coin duly catalogued for the years 16, 17 and 18 of Tiberius Caesar, which would be the years 29, 30 and 31 of our era.

AN ANOMALY THAT DOES NOT DECEIVE
Confirmed by three-dimensional analysis, the discovery was found to be definitively corroborated by its very fruitfulness, for it led to some unexpected progress in numismatic science. Four Greek letters, Y CAI, are in fact all that are needed to reconstruct the inscription TIBEPIO [Y KAI] CAPOC, "of Tiberius Caesar". But there is an anomaly: on the Holy Shroud a Latin C replaces the initial Greek K of KAICAPOC, which figures on all the coin collections known up to 1980.

Thereafter, to those who accused Father Filas of letting his imagination run away with him or of taking his desires for reality, he answered that, not being a numismatist, he had so little desire to see a coin of Pilate's that "before I accidentally stumbled on this, he wrote to me, I would not have known a Pilate coin from a hole in the wall".

He was obliged, therefore, to consult the numismatic specialists, and it was then that his discovery proved to be so little the work of his imagination that it was responsible for a positive progress in the study of numismatics itself. It revealed that the anomaly observed on the Holy Shroud and already recognized as being of common usage in inscriptions but hitherto unknown in numismatics, existed identically on other collection coins struck under Pontius Pilate, which no one had noticed before.

We have here a document dated within a year or two by the express Will of Him Who caused this Image to be imprinted on the cloth.

For one would have expected to see shards of broken pottery used for covering the eyes, as was the Jewish custom, but it would not have been possible to read a date from them.

Whereas the little coin proclaims: it is "under Pontius Pilate" that this Man suffered.

203 posted on 03/05/2004 5:18:37 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
It was 19 years ago, I couldn't tell because it was covered in either red or purple silk and then glass enclosed, and the order of nuns and priests (nuns had on Flying Nun type headpieces) held it and people came up to kiss it....just like the feet of Jesus on the Cross on Good Friday!! It's only exposed on Good Friday.

I thought I was in line ti kiss the Cross and when I saw it I didn't have any idea of what it was, but there were pamphlets in the back with all the info, so I got back in line and looked at it again. I was in Shock and Awe!!

204 posted on 03/05/2004 5:23:14 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
bump
205 posted on 03/05/2004 5:25:12 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
It sure took on a different meaning after seeing and reading about the Shroud. As Christians we always knew He was crucified, but like my elderly parents said.. you just never "knew". I think Mel Gibson was right to "shock" us into realizing just how much He "suffered" for our sins, and what the weight of our sins were on this "man". Praise God!!

Also, I just found out about this:

http://www.shroudstory.com/sudarium.htm

I'm only just hearing about it... but I find it interesting.

The Shroud I have no doubt of.

The movie on the second viewing,.. was so much more .. "deeper" more "emotional" and "real" for us. We "felt" the movie. But of course we could never "feel" it like our Father "felt" it. We've never had a movie even give us a "glimmer" of what He went through.. but this movie did.

We'll never be the same as Christians after having seen it. I don't know why no one ever thought of the Shroud of Turin. But I kept going to it in my mind. I wanted to research it before I saw the movie the first time. Because I remembered hearing it alluded to how violent Jesus had suffered. I had watched so many documentaries on it.

I'm so glad I did!! Then we saw the movie again, and after doing the research, and KNOWING that He truly suffered so horrendously.. I cried harder the second time. I was really drained last night. But also felt so good too. Jesus is so awesome! Well, I better run. I just posted a post on the latest research (restoration) on the shroud. Then I saw your post. So I didn't get to ping you to it. It is right before this. Take a look at it!!

I'm WORRIED!!

God Bless!
206 posted on 03/05/2004 5:31:27 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
I would have been too!! Wow...
207 posted on 03/05/2004 5:34:13 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Whereas the little coin proclaims: it is "under Pontius Pilate" that this Man suffered.

That's astounding. Do you have a link?

Jim Caviezal was on EWTN tonight saying that the Shroud shows that Jesus' suffering was worse than that depicted in the movie.

208 posted on 03/05/2004 6:09:30 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
You posted to the wrong guy...(you're forgiven)
About the only thing I see as more ridiculous than the shroud is when Mary was spotted in some soap scum on a window somewhere near Calle Ocho(Eighth St.), in Miami.

The only difference being the difference in the education of the superstitious cry for help...

That being said, I don't believe in miracles...
I rely on them daily and need the real thing.

209 posted on 03/05/2004 6:23:07 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
I saw an interesting program this evening.

I just finished watching The World Over Live (EWTN.) they had on Jim Caviezel. One of the e-mails was in regard to last night's Hardball, they had on a Bishop who called The Passion, pornographic and said that in the movie Jesus never said, Father forgive them for they know not what they do.

The response was really quite interesting. First Raymond Arroyo, commented that the same bishop has written several novel, that are rather pornographic in nature. As to the lines spoken in the movie. Jim Caviezel said that Father forgive them was actually used three times during the movie.

210 posted on 03/05/2004 6:25:32 PM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Thanks for the ping. The Shroud of Turin has long been a hobby of mine.
211 posted on 03/05/2004 6:36:25 PM PST by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: happydogdesign
That's just precious-people who want to sell you books and junk have convinced you that the Catholic Church is lying about definitive proof of their own deity's resurrection.

The Catholic Encyclopedia is not an infallible document, and the on-line edition was written in 1911. There has been a lot of scientific analysis of the Shroud since then...

212 posted on 03/05/2004 6:40:01 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Nope, I meant to post to you. I honestly thought you might be interested. (Didn't you "read" to the bottom? I said, "for those who still don't believe" and then I posted some other information. :o)

That's ok. All sinners (and I'm sure not perfect) can use being forgiven! I'll take it whenever and where-ever I can get it!

FRegards!
213 posted on 03/05/2004 8:19:42 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
That being said, I don't believe in miracles... I rely on them daily and need the real thing.

PS. You must not have read our profile. I don't rely on only "miracles".. I rely on prayers. I rely on REAL McCoy daily too!! :o)

214 posted on 03/05/2004 8:22:50 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: mware
Luke 23:34 Then said Jesus "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" KJV

(Boy, where do all these whacko's come from? PORNO.. what the heck?)
215 posted on 03/05/2004 8:30:01 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I love it. I didn't know there was a thread on FR. I hope people will keep me pinged to it!! You are more than welcome btw!
216 posted on 03/05/2004 8:30:46 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Not to mention a Y chromosome.
217 posted on 03/05/2004 8:36:02 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I was fortunate enough to view the Shroud in 1978. We stood in an emense line that day creeping slowly toward the Cathedral. When we reached it it was somewhat hard to see, as the image that you are viewing is actually a negative. I was so taken by the reactions of those around me. Their faith was mirrored in their faces. Later we strolled by the Cathedral after dinner and could see the scientists setting up their equipment. It had been a tremendous experience.
218 posted on 03/05/2004 8:36:10 PM PST by Empireoftheatom48 (God bless our troops!! Our President and those who fight against the awful commie, liberal left!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
There is a Shroud ping list that I don't belong to, but it was pinged on this thread. I thank you for this lovely and heartfelt article. A Happy Easter to you and yours!
219 posted on 03/05/2004 8:43:21 PM PST by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48
How blessed you are! I would give anything to see the Shroud. I understand that it is quite delicate due to age and is shown very infrequently.

Thanks for sharing!
220 posted on 03/05/2004 8:45:00 PM PST by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson