Skip to comments.
Mel Gibson Responds to Passion Question - What's Up With the Ugly Baby?
Christianity Today ^
| March 3, 2004
| Mark Moring
Posted on 03/04/2004 9:43:15 AM PST by NYer
"Please explain the symbolism in the scene showing Satan holding a bald baby. Thank you."
Rosalinda Celentano as Satan
|
That's just one of dozens of e-mails we've received in the last few days, asking about a surreal scene in The Passion of The Christ where Satan is shown cradling a hideous baby who looks like he's about 40 years old.
The scene occurs during the flogging of Christ. Satan is passing through a crowd of onlookers, cradling an infant in his arms. The baby turns to face the camera, revealing a sinister infant, creeping out audiences everywhere.
We took your questions straight to the source, e-mailing Mel Gibson's publicist for an answer.
When asked why he portrayed Satanan androgynous, almost beautiful being played by Rosalinda Celentanothe way he did, Gibson replied: "I believe the Devil is real, but I don't believe he shows up too often with horns and smoke and a forked tail. The devil is smarter than that. Evil is alluring, attractive. It looks almost normal, almost goodbut not quite.
"That's what I tried to do with the Devil in the film. The actor's face is symmetric, beautiful in a certain sense, but not completely. For example, we shaved her eyebrows. Then we shot her almost in slow motion so you don't see her blinkthat's not normal. We dubbed in a man's voice in Gethsemane even though the actor is a woman
That's what evil is about, taking something that's good and twisting it a little bit."
But what about the ugly baby?
"Again," said Gibson, "it's evil distorting what's good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old 'baby' with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too muchjust like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place."
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evil; gibson; passion; satan; thepassion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
1
posted on
03/04/2004 9:43:16 AM PST
by
NYer
To: american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; CAtholic Family Association; narses; ...
Song of the Angels William-Adolphe Bouguereau
What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child?
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
2
posted on
03/04/2004 9:45:36 AM PST
by
NYer
(Ad Jesum per Mariam)
To: NYer
Sounds clear and simple to me.
3
posted on
03/04/2004 9:46:49 AM PST
by
fml
( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
To: NYer
I thought the baby in question was Michael Eisner.
4
posted on
03/04/2004 9:47:46 AM PST
by
Migjagger
To: NYer
A lot of people wondered about this one.
To: NYer
The daughter of a co-worker said, "It's the Anti-christ." Everyone I relate this to remarks, "D'oh!" (or something to that effect).
6
posted on
03/04/2004 9:48:04 AM PST
by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: NYer
"I believe the Devil is real, but I don't believe he shows up too often with horns and smoke and a forked tail. The devil is smarter than that. Evil is alluring, attractive. It looks almost normal, almost goodbut not quite. That explains a lot about the period between 1992-and 2000.
7
posted on
03/04/2004 9:48:24 AM PST
by
ilgipper
To: Eala
The daughter of a co-worker said, "It's the Anti-christ." What Mrs. Theknow and I both thought as well as everyone else we have spoken to that has seen the movie.
8
posted on
03/04/2004 9:52:06 AM PST
by
N. Theknow
(John Kerry is nothing more than Ted Kennedy without a dead girl in the car.)
To: NYer
"it's evil distorting what's good"
The moment a thing is strange is when it is the most familiar...
9
posted on
03/04/2004 9:52:12 AM PST
by
BossLady
To: ilgipper
ilgipper, BINGO! You win the grand prize!
(Hillary was the ugly, hairy-backed baby who was along for the ride...)
To: NYer
I think it was excessive exposure to Ingmar Bergman films.
11
posted on
03/04/2004 9:57:50 AM PST
by
Stentor
To: NYer
"Again," said Gibson, "it's evil distorting what's good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old 'baby' with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too muchjust like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place." The movie's okay, I guess, but I prefer the book.
To: xsmommy
The Passion of the Christ ping!
Interesting information.
13
posted on
03/04/2004 10:06:12 AM PST
by
CSM
(Looking for a stay at home mom for my future offspring!)
To: ilgipper
*LOL*
(Sorry got off task)
14
posted on
03/04/2004 10:07:18 AM PST
by
PaulaB
( Our nation was founded upon the principle of God)
To: Agnes Heep
"The movie's okay, I guess, but I prefer the book."
Ditto.
To: Agnes Heep
the purpose of the movie is to gather in those that continue to eschew the book.
16
posted on
03/04/2004 10:07:45 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: xsmommy
[T]he purpose of the movie is to gather in those that continue to eschew the book. True, no doubt; but after all that juicy action I'd find it pretty hard to get into King James.
To: NYer
Then we shot her almost in slow motion so you don't see her blinkthat's not normal.Like Michael Kinsley, Marshall Applewhite, Wesley Clark, Jean-Bertrand Aristide--all noted non-blinkers.
To: ilgipper
Evil is alluring, attractive. It looks almost normal, almost goodbut not quite. 'That explains a lot about the period between 1992-and 2000.'
I think you need to rethink this one. Which one was Hillary ?
19
posted on
03/04/2004 10:11:18 AM PST
by
smokeyb
To: Agnes Heep
God uses many attention getting devices to gather in his own : ) Best to leave Him the gamut with which to work. Mel is merely an instrument.
20
posted on
03/04/2004 10:11:47 AM PST
by
xsmommy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson