Skip to comments.
Report: Israel broke Iranian code
Jerusalem Post ^
| Mar. 2, 2004
| Yaakov Katz
Posted on 03/02/2004 6:24:22 AM PST by Alouette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
1
posted on
03/02/2004 6:24:24 AM PST
by
Alouette
To: 1bigdictator; 1st-P-In-The-Pod; 2sheep; a_witness; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel ping list.
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
2
posted on
03/02/2004 6:24:59 AM PST
by
Alouette
(Mitul d'min kadam Shemayo malchusa v'shalim b'ammaya)
To: Alouette
bump
3
posted on
03/02/2004 6:25:47 AM PST
by
Samwise
(According to Kerry, President Bush is under-reacting to an overstated threat)
To: Alouette
Would be lovely to know if more than JFKerry are in communication with IRAN.
To: Samwise
Bump! This doesn't suprise me!
Israel has the best intel of anybody.
5
posted on
03/02/2004 6:29:09 AM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(You...You sit down! You've had your say and now I'll have mine!!!!)
To: Alouette
*BUMP*!
6
posted on
03/02/2004 6:30:32 AM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: ConservativeMan55
This doesn't suprise me! Israel has the best intel of anybody.U.S.S. Liberty
To: Alouette
Smells like psy-ops to me. First, how would the JP find out about this? Second, why would they print it since it puts the news staff in direct danger of Iran? Third, if true, wouldn't the JP face serious criminal charges? If I'm not mistaken, Israel does not have the same liberalness of the Freedom of the Press as we do.
8
posted on
03/02/2004 6:36:29 AM PST
by
Tree of Liberty
("The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.")
To: Tree of Liberty
If I'm not mistaken, Israel does not have the same liberalness of the Freedom of the Press as we do. The Israeli press is dominated by the left, even more so than in this country. Leftist media outlets (like "Ha'aretz") routinely incite all manner of pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel propaganda, while right-wing organs (like Arutz Sheva) are in danger of being shut down.
Secondly, if you read the article, this story first broke in the New Yorker.
9
posted on
03/02/2004 6:40:02 AM PST
by
Alouette
(Mitul d'min kadam Shemayo malchusa v'shalim b'ammaya)
To: Gunslingr3
If that's the first thing that comes to your mind when Israel is brought up, then I think you're a Jew-hater.
10
posted on
03/02/2004 6:45:50 AM PST
by
aynrandfreak
(If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
To: Alouette
My first reaction is that this is BS. If it were true, OBL would have been in the bag a long time ago. Or maybe... Nah.
11
posted on
03/02/2004 6:46:00 AM PST
by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: Gunslingr3
"U.S.S. Liberty"
Sounds to me like you have your own intelligence problems.
12
posted on
03/02/2004 6:47:34 AM PST
by
adam_az
(Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
To: Gunslingr3
The First Rule of Fight Club is You Do Not Talk About Fight Club
The Second Rule of Fight Club is You Do Not Talk About Fight Club
To: aynrandfreak
If that's the first thing that comes to your mind when Israel is brought up, then I think you're a Jew-hater.Israeli's strafe the crap out of a U.S. flagged vessel in international waters and knowing that fact makes me a 'Jew-hater'? 34 Americans killed and 172 injured and knowing that makes me a 'Jew-hater'! Your effort to forget the truth by trying to disparage me with racist labels is lame.
"So likewise, a passionate attachment of one Nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite Nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the Nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."
"As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practise the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the Public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter."
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens,) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove, that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests."
Call me America-lover, if you need a label...
To: Gunslingr3
To: Alouette
You're right. I skimmed over that bit. Apologies.
16
posted on
03/02/2004 7:04:54 AM PST
by
Tree of Liberty
("The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.")
To: Alouette
"this story first broke in the New Yorker."
Well that's all the proof I need that it's legit.
hooohay.
To: Alouette
Seymour Hersh is wrong more often than he's right, plus he has a left-wing agenda. I'd just as soon believe DEBKA.
To: Gunslingr3
David Duke considers himself an America-lover too. In fact, even the obvious America-haters won't admit they hate America, but they only want to focus on America's flaws (slavery, Indians, etc). That's their whole view of America. And when someone's biggest issue is bringing up the Liberty whenever Israel is mentioned, to me doesn't like Israel. Israel had no motive to hit the Liberty, and they stopped on their own once they realized it wasn't an enemy ship. My experience has taught me that most of those same people that have visceral dilike towards Israel, don't like Jews.
You keep calling yourself an America-lover. I stand by my judgment.
19
posted on
03/02/2004 7:12:03 AM PST
by
aynrandfreak
(If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
To: Alouette
Ugh, have no trust in Hersch at all.
20
posted on
03/02/2004 7:14:38 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson