Posted on 03/01/2004 10:06:25 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:35 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is working with state Democrats to revamp a bill that would allow illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses, a politically fractious issue that contributed to the ousting of his predecessor.
Three months after securing a repeal of Senate Bill 60, the highly criticized bill approved by former Gov. Gray Davis, Mr. Schwarzenegger is working to craft substitute legislation, which would address national security concerns and ensure that drivers carry insurance, with Democratic state Sen. Gil Cedillo.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
Oh no! We wouldn't want to alert the police that they were dealing with a lawbreaker, now would we?
I really hate this argument. So, illegal aliens are going to break the law anyway by driving without a license, so we might as well accomodate them by giving them a license? What if a 10-year-old kid said "I'm going to drive anyway so you might as well give me a license". Should we give him a driver's license. What if a person with poor eyesight, who couldn't qualify for a driver's license because of his eyesight, said "I'm going to drive anyway so you might as well give me a license". An illegal alien without a driver's license is no different than an American without a driver's license. If you don't have a license, stay the heck off the roads! That's the best way to make the roads safer for all licensed drivers.
**"I told you so" bump to the top. Saber, I wish more in Cali had read and heeded your posts. **Who could have seen this coming?? |
Wrong. Liability and Damage are on the driver and are required to be carried by the driver whether or not the car is insured. The insurance on the car is only for damage to the car. They just assiociate it with the car for convenience. For example, if you rent a car and get in an accident and do NOT take the rip-off supplemental insurance, your auto insurance is on the line for damage to property and people (but not the car itself).
A few of us have been trying to get a coherent answer to this question for a week or so. The only "answer" appears to be that Arnold will somehow find a way to overturn SB60 but nobody seems to have any idea how.
Hey Bob...looks like we finally got an answer to the question!
Fat chance in the Land of Riordan.
RINOs run the state now. California is the NY of the west coast. Get ready for more Tom Campbells, and remember, you voted for it!
Look it up somewhere, or ask a lawyer. I know whereof I speak. Insurance is carried on the car. There is usually a clause about covering the owner of the car if he is driving someone else's car, but that is primarily to cover an uninsured car.
When any of my kids got a license, there was no insurance requirement for them, but the insurance on my cars went up. If a kid is the primary driver of a vehicle the rates are astronomical, but the insurance is still on the car.
From the California DMV web site:
"Vehicle owners are required to submit evidence of liability insurance to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) when renewing the registration of a motor vehicle. Trailers, off-highway vehicles, and vessels are excluded from this requirement. Acceptable paper evidence of current liability insurance is an insurance identification card issued to vehicle owners by insurance companies."
Yes, we did. And Oh My, what a surprise. </sarcasm>
It's easy to suffer from burnout here what with the continuing influx of illegals, the overturning of the original Prop 187 and then gay marriages after passing Prop 22 (??). Voters get discouraged.
But if you wish to help, you can download the petition from their website to print the form and gather signatures.
I've already done that. Maybe things will pick up again between now and November.
From the California Vehicle Code (emphasis added):
CALIFORNIA CODES VEHICLE CODE SECTION 34630-34634
16020. (a) Every driver and every owner of a motor vehicle shall at all times be able to establish financial responsibility pursuant to Section 16021, and shall at all times carry in the vehicle evidence of the form of financial responsibility in effect for the vehicle.
I know because many moons ago I got berated (but not nailed because the law was new) for driving a car when I wasn't insured. Even if you don't own a car, you MUST have insurance to even drive in California.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.