Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay unions accepted as routine in cultures for centuries
Salt Lake City Tribune ^ | Feb 29, 2004 | Will Bagley

Posted on 03/01/2004 12:46:27 PM PST by george wythe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2004 12:46:27 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george wythe
The Victorians turned it into an identity, but same-sex sex has been going on since time immemorial and was considered entirely natural in ancient Greece and Rome.

Yes, and where are those cultures now? Can anyone say "decline?"

2 posted on 03/01/2004 12:50:08 PM PST by StarCMC (God protect the 969th in Iraq and their Captain, my brother...God protect them all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
"Many cultures"? And they all seem to be Amerindians. Which is to say, stone age peoples.

Yeah, we should be like that.

3 posted on 03/01/2004 12:54:04 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
This guy is deliberately misreading Richard Wilkins. Even polygamous marriages are about the sexual union of man and woman.
4 posted on 03/01/2004 12:54:17 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
The Greco-Roman culture viewed same-sex relations much the same way that we today do heavy drinking - something to laugh at from abroad, but hardly something to actively promote. It never once occurred to them to marry a man to a man or a woman to a woman because it was understood that marriage was an institution designed for heterosexuals.

I also very much doubt that many ancient cultures that tolerated homosexuality had anything resembling that the rather peculiar subculture that has grown up in the last 100 years or so that we today refer to as "gay." Even in Greco-Roman times it was understood that those who engaged in such relations would eventually go on into heterosexual relationship and marriages.
5 posted on 03/01/2004 12:54:19 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe

We're mainstream!
Really!


6 posted on 03/01/2004 12:56:14 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
American Indian languages had a variety of terms -- winkte (Lakota)

Winkte?

I don't think one needs to be a Lakota Sioux to understand that that term sounds pretty gay.

7 posted on 03/01/2004 12:57:42 PM PST by Michael.SF. ('After all, Jesus was born to a homeless couple' - Hillary Clinton (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC
Yes, and where are those cultures now? Can anyone say "decline?"

Unfortunately for the "homosexuality caused the decline" of these cultures theory, the greatest popularity of homosexuality coincided quite nicely with the greatest period for each. Their decline actually concided with a return to more "traditional" morality.

Personally, I can find lots of other, entirely historical reasons for being opposed to these practices.

8 posted on 03/01/2004 12:57:43 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Since it's been a while since I took any anthropology class, I googled the term "berdache" and found this picture:

It comes from this article:

Over 130 different Native American tribes had a special category of men who wore women's clothing, spent their time doing "women's work" such as basket weaving and pottery, and held a sacred, spiritual role in the tribe. Berdaches had sex with other men, and marriages between a berdache and another man were common. Sometimes in a polygamous marriage, a berdache became a secondary "wife" to a male who was already married to one or more women.
American Heritage Dictionary defines berdache:
Among certain Native American peoples, a person, usually a male, who assumes the gender identity and is granted the social status of the opposite sex.

9 posted on 03/01/2004 12:58:12 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
You mean after all this time we now know it wasn't the white man's fault! The Indians screwed themselves?
10 posted on 03/01/2004 1:01:52 PM PST by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Even in Greco-Roman times it was understood that those who engaged in such relations would eventually go on into heterosexual relationship and marriages

Just like the Arabs?

I've read many reports from Westerners about homosexual sex being common in Arab countries, but men always end up getting married in order to continue the family name.

11 posted on 03/01/2004 1:02:12 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Sorry - don't buy it. It takes a while for those things to affect the standing of the country. Doesn't happen overnight.
12 posted on 03/01/2004 1:02:26 PM PST by StarCMC (God protect the 969th in Iraq and their Captain, my brother...God protect them all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill didn't actually say "the only traditions of the Royal Navy are rum, sodomy and the lash," but he may have wished he had. What is that doing in the middle of this poorly-written piece? Bizarre. This author wrote this late at night after 3 glasses of merlot.
13 posted on 03/01/2004 1:03:14 PM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
hy is this called hate speech. It offends Catholics
14 posted on 03/01/2004 1:04:22 PM PST by FlatLandBeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
"Historian Will Bagley is happily 'married'."

To what?


15 posted on 03/01/2004 1:05:27 PM PST by Redcoat LI ("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Even polygamous marriages are about the sexual union of man and woman.

Do you happen to know what happened to Brigham Young's marriages according to Mormon theology after he died?

Is Brigham Young still in a polygamist marriage to his 56 wives, or is he united to only one of them in the Mormon afterlife?

16 posted on 03/01/2004 1:07:32 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
It is false that the ancient Greeks considered homos "normal." Man/boy relationships were certainly more complex than today but when a man refused marriage and children and became the passive partner in homo relations, they were scourned, ridiculed or worse. That role was acceptable for a boy but not a man.

Read what Plato said about such relations in "The Laws" it ain't pleasant. Much of the homo relations refered to in Greece were not of the carnal nature hence the term "platonic." In addition, any sexual relations were not of the type favored by modern queers.
17 posted on 03/01/2004 1:07:50 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
...Historian Will Bagley is happily married.

To whom? Or should I say to what? A man? A goat? A (gasp) woman?

As a happily married woman whose husband happens to be a MAN, I think the idea of polygamy stinks. It seemed to cause a lot more problems in the Old Testament and is still causing more than a few in this day and age. If homosexuals are allowed to marry, polygamists wanting their right to the pursuit of happiness can't be far behind. What's to stop this from happening? Ugh.

I'm sure a few FReeper guys think this might be a great idea. Think again, guys. Each of your wives will have their very own charge accounts and will play a game of musical PMS every month. :)

18 posted on 03/01/2004 1:08:09 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
I'm uncertain - certainly a number of younger al-Qaeda jihadis have turned out to have been molested by their superiors in the Afghan camps and a number of the Pakistani madrassa chiefs are evidently pedophiles, but I'm wary about judging cultural attitudes on a particular subject on the basis of members of a terrorist organization.

I do know from my own reading that the Qur'an that homosexual relations are condemned there in no uncertain terms as well as that all Muslim countries maintain anti-sodomy laws. The Malaysian deputy prime minister was actually sacked on the trumped-up allegation that he engaged in such practices. But no honest clue as to just how common these things are.
19 posted on 03/01/2004 1:08:15 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
To whom? Or should I say to what? A man? A goat? A (gasp) woman?

LOL! All I know is that he lives in Utah.

Which kind of marriages are common in Utah?

20 posted on 03/01/2004 1:10:44 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson