Posted on 03/01/2004 8:54:04 AM PST by PropertyRightsResearch.org
Regional Governance is Here
"This commission has become a nightmare, beyond the reach of either state government, or Congress, short of repealing the Act altogether. This appointed commission has absolute authority over all land use within the designated counties, with the authority to override both county and state elected officials..."
March 1, 2004
By Henry Lamb
henry@freedom.org
NewsWithViews.com
To submit a Letter to the Editor: newswithviews@newswithviews.com
There are currently six Regional Commissions in place, or pending final approval, which impact states from New York to California; from Florida to Washington. Few people realize that these regional commissions even exist, or the growing influence they have over the lives of ordinary people, by providing the mechanism through which appointed individuals, rather than elected officials, develop public policy.
http://www.newswithviews.com/images/appa-regionmap.gif
The Appalachian Regional Commission http://www.arc.gov/index.jsp, created in 1965, was the pilot project, created to provide federal funding for the poverty-stricken counties throughout Appalachia. The Commission brought new roads and improved infrastructure to poor counties, and was widely accepted by local governments.
http://www.newswithviews.com/images/columbia-gorge.gif
Next came the Columbia River Gorge Commission http://www.gorgereality.com/, in 1986, with a different objective, and a different organizational structure. This commission was mandated by Congress, and required the States of Washington and Oregon to create the commission as defined by the legislation. This commission has become a nightmare, beyond the reach of either state government, or Congress, short of repealing the Act altogether. This appointed commission has absolute authority over all land use within the designated counties, with the authority to override both county and state elected officials.
The regional governance concept began in earnest with the Clinton-Gore administration. On the heels of the President's Council on Sustainable Development http://clinton4.nara.gov/PCSD/, came the President's Community Empowerment Board, chaired by Vice President Al Gore, which included 26 federal agencies. Through these initiatives, the Delta Region Study Commission was formed to advance the work of the Lower Mississippi Valley Ecosystem Restoration Initiative http://www.epa.gov/region4/programs/cbep/lowmiss.html.
http://www.newswithviews.com/images/delta-coveragemap.jpg
For eight years, this study commission, funded by Congress, defined and catalogued every facet of economic, social, and environmental activity throughout the 240 counties in eight states designated by the commission. The study commission became the Delta Regional Authority http://www.dra.gov/, on December 27, 2000, when enabling legislation was attached to the Farm Bill in the lame-duck session of Congress. The bill also created the Northern Great Plains Authority, covering North and South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, and Nebraska. This Authority receives $1.5 million through the Farm Bill, but President Bush has not included it in his 2005 budget, nor has a federal co-chair been nominated.
The Delta Authority, or Commission, is governed by co-chairs, one appointed by the President, Patrick H. Johnson http://www.dra.gov/federalcochair.php who has one-half vote; and the other co-chair with one-half vote, who are the collective governors of the participating states. All the governors together have one-half vote, which must represent the majority of the governors. One vote is required to approve projects.
Using the data collected over the years, the Delta Regional Commission directs federal funds to projects it deems to be appropriate, and which meet the principles of "sustainable development." Projects are developed by "stakeholder councils," and proposed through "empowerment zones," and "enterprise communities." These stakeholder councils are often the same people, and the same councils, that serve as "visioning councils" in communities where "Smart Growth," Heritage and Historic areas, scenic byways, recreational trails, and ecosystem restorations are being planned.
Two new Regional Commissions are awaiting final approval by this Congress: the Southeast Crescent Region (HR141) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00141:, which includes seven states from Florida to Virginia, and the Southwest Border Region (HR1071) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.01071:, which includes California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.
While these quasi-governmental regional authorities have brought new federal dollars to many communities, they are also eroding the authority and accountability of local and state elected officials. Moreover, they are slowly transforming the processes of representative government.
The governors who sit as co-chair on these Authorities, are mere figureheads; the work is done by appointed staff on loan from state and federal agencies. Because these Authorities are multi-jurisdictional, they operate beyond the control of any county or state. They are controlled only by Congressional appropriation to the various agencies that supply money to the regional authorities. Since the Clinton-Gore years, virtually all federal agencies have worked to advance the principles of sustainable development, as set forth in Agenda 21, http://sovereignty.freedom.org/p/sd/a21/ and by the President's Council on Sustainable Development.
Stakeholder councils are driven by activists at the local level, promoting their particular agenda assignment, such as: Heritage areas, Historic sites, open space, mass transit, watershed protection, wilderness restoration, and growth boundaries. Typically, these councils consist of representatives of special-interest, non-government organizations, and employees of local, state, and federal government agencies. Ordinary taxpayers are systematically discouraged from participating in these groups, although the councils are said to represent the public.
These are the groups that dictate public policy through the design of "sustainable" projects they know will be acceptable to the funding agencies. Local elected officials can either accept the projects, or be ridiculed for rejecting federal money.
Copyright 2004 Henry Lamb - All Rights Reserved.
Sign up for Free E-Mail Alerts: newsforyou-list-subscribe@newswithviews.com
Henry Lamb is the founding Chairman of Sovereignty International (1996) http://www.sovereignty.net, and the founding ECO of the Environmental Conservation Organization (1988) http://www.eco.freedom.org/el/. He is publisher of eco-logic Powerhouse, a widely read on-line, and print magazine. His columns are frequently translated into Spanish and published throughout Central and South America, Spain, Portugal, and Italy. He has attended United Nations meetings around the world, is a frequent speaker at conferences and workshops across the country, and is a regular guest on dozens of talk radio programs. He has provided testimony for the U.S. Congress, as well as State Legislatures, and has served as a consultant to FOX News on U.N. affairs.
For eight years, he was CEO of a national trade association for contractors, headquartered in Chicago, coming to that position from CEO of a private construction company specializing in erosion control and water management structures. His background includes teaching at the secondary school level, and serving four years as a legislative analyst for a county government in Florida. E-Mail: henry@freedom.org
http://www.newswithviews.com/Lamb/henry23.htm
Related Articles:
The Battle For Rural America
http://www.newswithviews.com/brownfield/brownfield19.htm
Water For The New World Governance
http://www.newswithviews.com/brownfield/brownfield20.htm
Separating People From Their Water
http://www.newswithviews.com/Coffman/mike6.htm
Henry Lamb Article Archive:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Lamb/henryA.htm
These largely unelected bodies operating under the phony concept of "consensus," are simply being used to over-ride the "will of the people" by the metro-sexuals against the surrounding rural areas!
Ambitious local electeds covet these positions of "power" and think it looks good on their resume for runs at higher office and get sucked in! Then they "go along to get along" and get swept away and carried away!!!
This coupled with the "Cows Don't Vote" decision shortly after the FDR regime are laying waste to the "red counties" in Rural America that surround the aggressive "blue counties" all over this land!!!
They just keep on paying their "progressive" income and all other taxes, even taxes on taxes, yet they simply won't care enough for their country to PAY ATTENTION!!!
The Cape Cod Commission was actually put in place by a county wide vote in the early nineties.
The head of the Commission now lives in an oceanfront home.
Maybe you saw that Frontline program on PBS entitled "For The Good Of All?"
To many, the word 'conservancy' means a good thing. They don't know about the special deals and maneuvering. I have relatives that were generous donors to the 'Nature Conservancy'. I sent them a link to the Washington Post series of articles exposing some of their dealings. They were shocked. The generous donations have ceased.
When at a meeting he spoke at toward the end of 2002 I asked him what he thought of the Recall that Sean Steele, (Parsky's predecessor) and Melanie Morgan were cooking up and he just sneared at it!!!
Now he thinks he's gonna suck up to Arnold the opportunist, who snatched it away and is now giving credence to GANG-GREEN along with the entire Sierra Nevada mountain range!!!
I believe he is more than an opportunist. Gray Davis was described by many as the most corrupt official to have occupied the State Capitol. I believe history will show that is no longer true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.