[KC_for_Freedom]

He would like to see a detailed plan for speeding the border jumpers to full citizenship.

We supported Forbes in his flat tax initiative until it became clear that border control was not in his plans. We thought Pat Buchanan had the right border idea, but could not get with the rest of his program. We know Bush to be a man of character and compassion. And better than a Kerry by a mile but we better have this discussion in the halls of congress before this goes any farther.

One solution would be to annex Mexico and establish a well controlled border at Guatamala. (Mexico has already done this for us.) We could create about ten states who would likly vote for a constitutional ammendment to protect marriage, immigration would be free, but would go both ways and as US capital went sought to create wonderful warm weather locations for retirees and US schools and rule of law replaced what passes for same in Mexico, the need for immigration would finally be ended. The losers would be the corrupt elites of Mexico and the socialist elites here in the states.

[Prodigal Son]

Interesting solution.

[B4Ranch]

One solution would be to annex Mexico and establish a well controlled border at Guatamala. (snip)

The losers would be the corrupt elites of Mexico and the socialist elites here in the states.

I would much prefer that you gather up some of the poor English speaking folks in your own neighborhood and take them under your financial wing.

Annexing a country that doesn't share so much as a language commonality with us would be worse than having your mother in law inspecting, issuing the standards, the guidelines and approving your sexual habits with your wife. You would need an attorney and a term translator to understand what your mother in law was ordering.

Once annexing Mexico, which also doesn't share a language commonality with us, we would need a battery of attorneys and an army of translators with the United Nations demanding approval issuance on every agreement before and after conferencing could begin.

No Thank You, that is a solution which America cannot afford.

[jpsb]

"We supported Forbes in his flat tax initiative until it became clear that border control was not in his plans"

Source?

[mrsmith]

That is what a nation-state would do IMO. What we would traditionally do.
Militarize our border and then use an inevitable conflict with the Mexican army as reason to invade and conquer.

That doesn't seem wise so perhaps we are not a nation-state in some way. But perhaps it will seem wise in the future- if we are still a nation-state and not some new entity.

[537 Votes]

We know Bush to be a man of character and compassion.

Read what the above article says about how Bush hid his immigration agenda from conservatives.

On what do you base the claim that Bush is a man of character and compassion? Do you know that for a fact, or are you going on . . . FEEEEEEELINGS.

Illegal immigration isn't honest policy disagreement. It's literally the collapse of civilization. And Bush is on the wrong side, and he deceived us. That's not honorable or compassionate in my eyes. That's a political sell-out, and there's no recovery.