[B4Ranch]

PING for discussion

[KC_for_Freedom]

He would like to see a detailed plan for speeding the border jumpers to full citizenship.

We supported Forbes in his flat tax initiative until it became clear that border control was not in his plans. We thought Pat Buchanan had the right border idea, but could not get with the rest of his program. We know Bush to be a man of character and compassion. And better than a Kerry by a mile but we better have this discussion in the halls of congress before this goes any farther.

One solution would be to annex Mexico and establish a well controlled border at Guatamala. (Mexico has already done this for us.) We could create about ten states who would likly vote for a constitutional ammendment to protect marriage, immigration would be free, but would go both ways and as US capital went sought to create wonderful warm weather locations for retirees and US schools and rule of law replaced what passes for same in Mexico, the need for immigration would finally be ended. The losers would be the corrupt elites of Mexico and the socialist elites here in the states.

[Thisiswhoweare]

"There is no need for Americans to wait 40 years to find similar documentation of official lies and deception by the Clinton and Bush administrations concerning the FTAA plan to merge the Americas. By then it would be too late. "

FTAA will be enacted in January of 2005, after which we will no longer have the ability to regulate ourselves, our borders and our trade. Meanwhile, our alledgedly conservative Republican leadership is playing around with things like the Defense of Marriage Act.

We argue the emotional hot-button conservative issues while the foundation of the republic itself is lost to the stroke of a pen.

[Pelham]

bump