[PhiKapMom]

Will do. I had my suspicions about this from the beginning but they really peaked after visiting the Bombing Memorial and then the Museum. Since then I have become totally convinced there was a cover-up.

There are some pictures of the bombing that I had never really looked at before recently. They don't make much more sense then this whole deal. Looks at this picture -- the debris is in front of the building but why weren't the traffic lights blown down from the truck bomb? If the truck was parked in front of the building -- why is the debris all in front instead of being blown out the back? The second photo is the back and side of the Murrah Building. I could be totally wrong but something about these pictures make me think something is not right.

http://photos.newsok.com/bombing/ There are a lot more photos archived at The Oklahoman on this page. The one of the Clintons at the Memorial Service is not the one the mural is made from. In that one they are both there with that cat that swallowed canary look.

[FairOpinion]

Good questions.

http://www.aim.org/publications/weekly_column/2001/11/21.html

OKLAHOMA BOMBING LINKED TO BIN LADEN

Reed Irvine
Chairman, Accuracy in Media

November 21, 2001

"...there is a lot of evidence that an ANFO bomb alone could not have caused all the damage done to the Murrah Building and that smaller powerful bombs inside the building caused much, if not most, of it. Since the ANFO that the FBI says was in the Ryder truck failed to demolish a low concrete wall between it and the building, or knock down a nearby lamp post, it could not have destroyed the more distant reinforced concrete building."

[Peach]

I can hardly say their name without being sick. The damage they have done to this country is incalculable.

VERY interesting about the debris. This is going to be interesting in the next few weeks to see what comes out...