Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Friday, February 27, 2004

Quote of the Day by kevao

1 posted on 02/27/2004 2:30:27 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
unrestrained liberty

This writer has a Biblical take on morality and homosexuality, and uses the "unrestrained liberty being bad" argument to deny liberty to homosexuals.

Our nation was principally founded on ethics based in reality, and any attempt to impose Biblical "morality" means a return to Dark Age thinking.

Among other things, women would be totally subservient to men, women dress codes would require covering from neck to toes, and all family income would be the property of the male in charge. It would take us back to "The good old days" of a Patriarch age.

2 posted on 02/27/2004 2:47:31 PM PST by thinktwice (The human mind is blessed with reason, and to waste that blessed mind is treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
read later
3 posted on 02/27/2004 2:51:39 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
BTTT
7 posted on 02/27/2004 4:11:31 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Will the full realization of "EQUALITY" as now redefined change other unintended norms? If we are to cast aside norms dictated by thousands of years of use, will other time honored conventions pass by the wayside?

Will the Ex-Husband get the kids in 50% of divorce cases?..That would be "fair".Will the court mandate that the ex-wife also pay him alimony? That would be "fair". We can't do things the old unfair way any more you know.Tradition used to say give the mom the kids, but we can't do that anymore.

Will the courts mandate that 50% of all line combat units be female? Only that number would make things "fair and equal." Will women be held back from voting in national elections until this quota is met?

Remember Congress and the President make decissions on war , and it would not be "fair or equal" to allow women a voice in electing these folks when women risk none of the danger in combat units.

I know we used to do things based on time honored tradition but judicial activists have changed things. The Pigs have climbed the ladder at night and painted new rules on the barn.

Will the courts mandate that 50% of the people who drive up on the truck that takes my trash away be women? I'm talking about actually lifting bags and tossing them here..not just driving.Will sanitation departments be mandated to fill these quotas?

Will the courts mandate that any male who wants an abortion be able to get one at state expense? I realize that most men are not capable of carrying child but since we are ignoring physical realities to placate a 2% minority what the heck....

If gay marrige passes in Mass. or Calif. are other states mandated to recognize them? Does the State Constitution prevail or the Federal Constitution? Since my state constitution says the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be questioned, does that mean Mass. Calif. N.Y. et al now must allow me to carry a fire arm in their state? Only that option would be "Fair and Equal"....

How many Angels can dance on the lid of an opened can of worms rolling down a slippery slope?

8 posted on 02/27/2004 4:11:35 PM PST by Grendelgrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Please see also:

Bricks And Mortar

And:

The Politicization Of Love

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason:
http://palaceofreason.com

9 posted on 02/27/2004 4:37:33 PM PST by fporretto (This tagline is programming you in ways that will not be apparent for years. Forget! Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping. Very good article. I like statement:

"Proponents of traditional values are making a tactical error in allowing the homosexual lobby to frame the issue of same-sex marriage merely as one of equal rights for gays. Much more is at stake."

If anyone wants on off this ping list, ping me!


12 posted on 02/27/2004 9:10:48 PM PST by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump



What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
The Stamp of Normality

15 posted on 02/27/2004 10:11:45 PM PST by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson