Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Marriage a Voting Issue, But Mostly for Opponents ....
Pew Research Center ^ | Released: February 27, 2004 | Not Provided

Posted on 02/27/2004 12:04:23 PM PST by .cnI redruM

Gay marriage has surpassed other major social issues like abortion and gun control in its influence on voters. Four-in-ten voters say they would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with them on gay marriage, even if they agree with the candidate on most other issues. By comparison, 34% say they would not support a candidate who disagrees with them on abortion and 32% expressed that opinion about a candidate's stance on gun control.

Yet while gay marriage has a greater overall impact on voters than either abortion or gun control, the nature of its influence is quite different. For the most part, gay marriage is a make-or-break voting issue only to the opponents of that idea; supporters of gay marriage generally say a candidate's stance would not affect their vote. Moreover, even among gay marriage opponents, the issue has a disproportionate impact on some groups ­ notably conservative Republicans, evangelical Christians and voters age 65 and older.

The latest Pew Research Center national survey shows that voters oppose gay marriage by more than two-to-one (65%-28%), a margin that has remained generally steady since October. (This survey was conducted Feb. 11-16, prior to President Bush's Feb. 24 announcement that he would support a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage). (This analysis based on registered voters only; topline based on general public.)

Other recent national surveys have found that, in spite of the broad opposition to gay marriage, the public is divided over a constitutional amendment to ban the practice. An ABC News/Washington Post poll conducted Feb. 18-22 showed that 46% support a constitutional amendment while 45% believe it should be up to each state to make its own laws regarding homosexual marriage.

Further, despite the current furor over gay marriage, the public generally does not view a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage as a top national priority. In the Pew Research Center's annual poll of priorities for the president and Congress, conducted in January before events in Massachusetts and San Francisco gave more prominence to the issue, just 22% of Americans said passing a constitutional amendment to prohibit gay marriages was a top priority. The issue ranked 21st out of 22 items tested.

Gay Marriage and Voting

Yet it is also the case that gay marriage evokes intense feelings ­ especially from staunch opponents of the practice. Nearly half of voters (45%) strongly oppose allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally. As a point of comparison, just three-in-ten voters strongly oppose making it more difficult to get an abortion, while 17% strongly favor tighter abortion restrictions.

These intense sentiments are driving the voting decisions of many gay marriage opponents. About a third of voters (34%) say they would not support a candidate who favors gay marriage, even if they agree with the candidate on most other issues. By comparison, just 6% of voters say they would not back a candidate who opposes gay marriage, even if the candidate is otherwise acceptable. The impact of abortion and gun control on voting decisions is much more mixed: comparable percentages of voters who favor and oppose abortion rights, and gun control, say they would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with their position.

Six-in-ten Republican voters (61%) strongly oppose gay marriage, and half would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with them on the issue, even if they agree with the candidate's positions on most other matters. Similarly, two-thirds of white evangelical Protestant voters (67%) strongly oppose gay marriage; more than half (55%) say they would not back a candidate who does not share that opinion, even if the candidate's other positions are acceptable. Opposition to gay marriage is far less of a factor in the voting decisions of white Catholics and non-evangelical Protestants.

A solid majority of voters age 65 and older also express strong opposition to gay marriage (60%). In fact, opposition to gay marriage is nearly as important for these voters as it is for Republicans (45% vs. 50%). There are major differences among age groups over this issue. Just 23% of voters under age 30 say they would not for a candidate who supports gay marriage, even if they agree with the candidate on other issues.

Abortion, Gun Control Have Mixed Effect

Public opinion on abortion and gun control has changed little in recent years. In the current poll, a 58% majority of voters oppose making it more difficult for women to obtain abortions, while 37% support tighter restrictions on abortion. By a comparable margin (56%-39%), voters believe it is more important to control gun ownership than to protect the right of Americans to own guns.

Yet those who base their vote primarily on a candidate's position on these issues are fairly evenly split between proponents and opponents. About one-in-five voters (19%) say they would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with their position in support of continued access to abortion; 15% say they would not vote for a candidate who takes the opposite view. The impact of gun control on voting decisions is similarly mixed.

On abortion, roughly a quarter of Democrats (26%) say they would not vote for a candidate who supported efforts to make abortions more difficult to obtain; the same percentage of Republicans (26%) would not vote for a candidate who took the opposite position. Women are generally supportive of continued access to abortion (61% vs. 54% of men), and more women than men would not vote for a candidate who favors making abortions more difficult to obtain (23% vs. 14% of men).

Roughly three-in-ten Republicans (29%) say they would not vote for a candidate who believes it is more important to control gun ownership than protect the rights of gun owners. A sizable minority of men also take that position (25%).

While the vast majority of Democratic voters (68%) believe it is more important to control gun ownership than protect the right of Americans to own guns, relatively few Democrats (19%) say they would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with them on this issue. Fully 44% of Democrats say they would vote for a candidate even if they differed with him or her on that particular issue.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; civilunion; homosexualagenda; issues; marriage; pew; poll; wedgeissues
Here it is, the latest on so-called "Wedge Issues". I think of them more as common-decency issues, but hey. That's why I'm here rather than over on Slate or DU.
1 posted on 02/27/2004 12:04:23 PM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The intensity factor. It's something many politicians forget about.
2 posted on 02/27/2004 12:09:31 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"But Senator Kerry's position is clear, he is for civil unions, and like the governor and President Bush, John Kerry opposes gay marriage."-- Michael Meehan, John Kerry campaign spokesman

I guess this poll is sort of irrelevant.

3 posted on 02/27/2004 12:15:14 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I hope the muckity mucks in the GOP strategery department can interpret this. What is says to me is that a GOP candidate who is clearly pro-life, opposes any new gun control, and supports a ban on gay marriage will win easily because the GOP base will love him and about 20% of the rats can't bring themselves to vote for their own party's baby-killing, gay-marrying, gun grabbers.
4 posted on 02/27/2004 12:16:07 PM PST by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
As long as people are stupid enough to believe Michael Meehan.
5 posted on 02/27/2004 12:16:31 PM PST by .cnI redruM (At the end of the day, information has finite value and may only come at a significant price.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Reference Item:

Judaism’s Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected Homosexuality

6 posted on 02/27/2004 1:20:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
What's irrelevent are the words of a Liberal who support putting Judges on the bench who will do exactly what he claims to oppose.

Has Kerry expressed any disagreement at all with the egregious decision by the Mass Supreme Court? No. Has he supported the Mass Constitutional amendment? No. Does he support a Federal amendment to protect marriage between men and women only? No.

It's like the sickening display of liberal pols saying "I personally oppose abortion" but then going ahead and defending abortion-on-demand policies.

The Kerry political double speak is sickening actually.

7 posted on 02/27/2004 1:54:31 PM PST by WOSG (If we call Republicans the "Grand Old Party" lets call Democrats the Corrupt Radical Activist Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
this is interesting:

"a margin that has remained generally steady since October."


The homosexual groups have been playing up the support is growing and opposition is not there. They have been showing support in the 50's and opposition in the low 40's.

It seems the public at large does not want to look at homosexuals.

8 posted on 02/27/2004 2:50:55 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
I guess this poll is sort of irrelevant.

There is something positive to be said about it, though. Pew always finds way more liberals to poll than anybody else, so they're a fairly good barometer of what the center-to-left thinks. If "Four-in-ten voters say they would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with them on gay marriage," then by extension, six in ten would vote for someone who disagrees with them. If the Pew sample says this is not a big deal for its polling sample, then the President hasn't alienated many of them from his stand for an FMA. Of the four in ten, most of them are very unlikely to vote for Bush, because of other stands on issues that are liberal, anyway.

All in all, good news for the President.

9 posted on 02/27/2004 2:58:17 PM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
You know they are.
10 posted on 02/27/2004 4:11:37 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson