Skip to comments.
Father who married daughter ordered back to prison
customwire.ap.org ^
Posted on 02/27/2004 7:43:58 AM PST by chance33_98
Father who married daughter ordered back to prison
MOBILE, Ala. (AP) -- A 53-year-old man was sent back to prison after a judge decided the man had violated a probation order barring him from cohabitation with his 30-year-old daughter, who is also his former wife.
Mobile County Circuit Judge John Lockett ordered Carroll Eugene Ferdinandsen to prison on Thursday after determining he violated a probation order barring him from cohabitation with Alice Ferdinandsen.
Each had pleaded guilty to incest last summer in connection with their May 2003 civil marriage in Mobile County and served six months in jail before being released in January.
Prosecutors presented police witnesses who testified they found the father and daughter together in motel rooms on two occasions, just days after the couple's release from jail.
Each had pleaded guilty to incest last summer and served six months in jail before being released in January.
Lockett ordered Carroll Ferdinandsen to serve the remainder of a 10-year sentence.
The judge said the state had not proved its case against Alice Ferdinandsen and ruled she had not violated her probation.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: debauchery; incest; lawrencevtexas; marriage; moraldepravity; sexualperversion; slipperyslope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: chance33_98
Well, who are we to J U D G E ? ? ? ? ?
61
posted on
02/27/2004 11:04:46 AM PST
by
johnb838
(J. Effing Kerry, Esq., Traitor, Benedict Arnold was a war hero)
To: Snuffington
"I want to see any advocate of gay marriage explain the grounds for arguing against this while permitting homosexual marriage. We're talking about consenting adults here."
I am not an advocate of gay marriage, however, you do realize that incest often produces genetically deformed children right?
Gay marriage is creepy but at least it produces no children, deformed or otherwise.
62
posted on
02/27/2004 11:11:43 AM PST
by
monday
To: Mamzelle
Move to San Francisco.
63
posted on
02/27/2004 11:19:09 AM PST
by
GigaDittos
(Bumper sticker: "Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job.")
Comment #64 Removed by Moderator
Comment #65 Removed by Moderator
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: chance33_98
Father who married daughter ordered back to prison
My wife's father married her....to me. He is a minister.
To: Mamzelle
I don't see why this isn't a protected "lifestyle" choice.I am sure it soon will be and shortly thereafter 'interspecies marriage'.
I just heard on RUSH, a woman who wanted to marry HER FEMALE DOG. They have unconditional love for each other and are monogomous. Her parents and family object but she said, "Who are they to tell me HOW TO LIVE or WHOM to LOVE."
I am NOT kidding. It was just on (Fri 12:30 mst)
68
posted on
02/27/2004 11:37:36 AM PST
by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: Snuffington
Yeah I'm sick of people throwing up these straw man arguments like animal sex to the pro-homo-marriage people when there are real life examples like THIS, and what goes on in Utah of what we have to open the door to if we redefine marriage. I swear, if marriage is to be redefined, marriage must be abolished because then it is nothing but the tyranny of the connected over the unconnected, i.e., single.
69
posted on
02/27/2004 11:40:41 AM PST
by
johnb838
(J. Effing Kerry, Esq., Traitor, Benedict Arnold was a war hero)
To: Lizavetta
I think after the supremes rule on this and give rights to the homos ,(actually thats "if" the do). My wife and I are going to marry her sister and get the A.C.L.U to represent us so we can cover the whole Incest/Polygamy/Homo/ spectrum.
I'm sure they would probably jump at the chance.
70
posted on
02/27/2004 11:41:52 AM PST
by
Gottwnz
To: Montfort
It wasn't the Supremes... it was the Emanations and Penumbras.
71
posted on
02/27/2004 11:47:42 AM PST
by
johnb838
(J. Effing Kerry, Esq., Traitor, Benedict Arnold was a war hero)
To: GovernmentShrinker
If there are homo marriages, I'm waiting for the homo divorces. That ought to keep Court TV going for a while, heck they'll need a new channel just to keep up with it.
72
posted on
02/27/2004 11:50:43 AM PST
by
johnb838
(J. Effing Kerry, Esq., Traitor, Benedict Arnold was a war hero)
To: Van Jenerette
...for class reading.
73
posted on
02/27/2004 11:55:25 AM PST
by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic...If we can keep it!)
To: mhking
"...You got a purty mouth..."OMG - that brought back such *bad* memories of the only movie that ever scared me to death!
74
posted on
02/27/2004 12:05:46 PM PST
by
dansangel
(*PROUD to be a knuckle-dragging, toothless, inbred, right-wing, Southern, gun-toting Neanderthal *)
To: chance33_98
If ya can't keep it in your pants, at least keep it in the family, I guess .....
To: johnb838
If there are homo marriages, I'm waiting for the homo divorces. That ought to keep Court TV going for a while, heck they'll need a new channel just to keep up with it. You could put something like that on PPV and make a fortune
76
posted on
02/27/2004 12:43:06 PM PST
by
scarface367
(This tagline known to the state of California to cause cancer in laboratory animals)
To: Lizavetta
In light of recent developments in San Francisco, isn't it discrimination and a violation of civil rights to bar two adults from consensual activities? After all, once you've opened the door to one kind of deviation you have no grounds to close it to other kinds. Absolutely. And if gay marriage goes through, what about bisexual marriage -- after all, why should bisexuals have to restrict their marriage choice to only one of the genders they are attracted to? It's their civil right to marry a man and a woman!
To: chance33_98
"I'm my own grandpa"
To: chance33_98
I heard some woman on Rush's show today wants to marry her dog.. But the dog is a female, so Rush is fine with it.... LOL!!!
79
posted on
02/27/2004 2:06:46 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(A thing not worth doing isn't worth doing well.)
To: chance33_98
Doesn't this fall under "adult transcendent liberty rights" that Kennedy squeezed out of the penumbra in Lawrence v Texas?
80
posted on
02/27/2004 2:08:14 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson