Skip to comments.
Clinton questions future of volunteer army
www.msnbc.com ^
| Today
| Tom Curry
Posted on 02/25/2004 1:22:26 PM PST by LongsforReagan
WASHINGTON - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday the all-volunteer military "raises serious questions in a democracy, both (about) how we define ourselves (and) what the real risks politically and militarily of taking action might be."
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cankles; clinton; coward; demonrat; draftdodger; harpy; hillary; military; pig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Let me get this straight, the women of Iraq were better off under Hussein?
To: LongsforReagan
This from the wife of an infamous draft-dodger?
2
posted on
02/25/2004 1:23:39 PM PST
by
mewzilla
To: LongsforReagan
DELIBERATELY SETTING ABOUT TO UNDERMINE THE MORALE OF THE MILITARY AND THE NATION IN TIME OF WAR IS TREASON.
Sorry, I had to say it.
To: LongsforReagan
Recycled Charlie Rangel. She wants the draft back so that she can draw bigger crowds at antiwar protests. Pathetic.
4
posted on
02/25/2004 1:24:55 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(At the end of the day, information has finite value and may only come at a significant price.)
To: LongsforReagan
Well heck, Hillary, if we had to wait for men like your husband to show up for the armed services, Americans would be speaking either German or Japanese today. ROFLMAO Semper Fi, Kelly
5
posted on
02/25/2004 1:25:18 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: NativeNewYorker
Don't apologize :) Hilliary speaks treason. Fluently.
6
posted on
02/25/2004 1:25:52 PM PST
by
mewzilla
To: LongsforReagan
Gee Hillary. If conscription is your bag, will you open it up to women also? Maybe get Chelsea in the draft? or does she, too "loathe" the military?
7
posted on
02/25/2004 1:25:52 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
To: LongsforReagan
I agree with this part:
"she blamed European countries that are members of NATO for not contributing the troops they have promised to maintain order in Afghanistan. She described the attitude of NATO members as a little bit of pique" and paraphrased their thinking as "oh, you really need us now? Were going to make you really sweat for it.""
8
posted on
02/25/2004 1:26:01 PM PST
by
optik_b
(follow the money)
To: LongsforReagan
I didn't see her complain back when we sent our troops into Somalia, Haiti, Kosovo, Bosnia, etc.
Nor did she complain when her husband bombed other countries to keep headlines away from his - er - anatomy.
oh. I forget. it's all about the clintons, ain't it? Whatever they do, whatever it costs, that's fine, just don't let anybody else do the same thing.
9
posted on
02/25/2004 1:26:08 PM PST
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: .cnI redruM
Bingo.
To: LongsforReagan
if America had only accepted her "hillary care" health plan, the world would be at peace and there would be no need for any country to have a military. just darn it!!!
To: LongsforReagan
We have the most efficient and effective fighting force in history and Hillary wants to mess with it! The democrats are not only frightening, they are dangerous!
To: .cnI redruM
"The all-volunteer force may make it easy for decision-makers just to try to keep it out of sight and out of mind, she said in a speech to the foreign policy think-tank the Brookings Institution in Washington."This would not be an issue if we have ethical leadership -- which we currently do. This would be an issue under any Clinton presidency. This woman is so vile.
13
posted on
02/25/2004 1:31:30 PM PST
by
Endeavor
To: LongsforReagan
No she is interested in the U.S. submitting to United Nations military. Then don't you know we would NOT need a military. Never forget these people(The Thing, TheThings Wife,Kerry etc etc) hate the united States military.
14
posted on
02/25/2004 1:32:35 PM PST
by
marty60
To: LongsforReagan
Everything about this story has . . .
I want to jump into the Presidential race so bad I can taste it!
. . . written all over it.
15
posted on
02/25/2004 1:34:07 PM PST
by
leadpenny
(What happens if you get scared half to death twice?)
To: Endeavor
>>>>>>>"The all-volunteer force may make it easy for decision-makers just to try to keep it out of sight and out of mind, she said in a speech to the foreign policy think-tank the Brookings Institution in Washington."
She must be reading "Black Hawk Down".
16
posted on
02/25/2004 1:34:20 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(At the end of the day, information has finite value and may only come at a significant price.)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
The New York Democrat did not call for a revival of conscription, which ended 30 years ago, but said the all-volunteer nature of the military hides from the public the costs of overseas actions.
And how is that Hillary? What a idiotic comment. But then again, it came from an idiot. So I guess it is not surprising.
18
posted on
02/25/2004 1:35:26 PM PST
by
Bud Krieger
( Who is Bud Krieger?)
To: LongsforReagan
Seesm like there's so weird, underground conspiracy theory going around fringe left-wing circles, saying that the volunteer military isn't working and the country will soon need a draft. (The theory seems to be that the president is so unpopular that no one will join the military, and there may be boatloads of secret casualties that need to be replaced. Whatever. It's stupid. It's just their fantasy about what they wish was happening.)
Have other picked up on this, or am I imagining it?
Seems like Hillary might be speaking to this group.
To: mewzilla
As if she would get any votes from young men and women who WANT to be DRAFTED! That would put a few extra nails in the coffin of her political career
20
posted on
02/25/2004 1:36:16 PM PST
by
AngieGOP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson