Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/15/2004 4:19:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

locked



Skip to comments.

Jesus Was Black, Not White, Group Says
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 2/24/04 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 02/24/2004 10:06:43 PM PST by kattracks

(1st Add: Includes comments by Rev. Jesse Peterson, president of B.O.N.D.)

(CNSNews.com) - One day before it debuts in theaters, a black activist group is protesting the Mel Gibson-written, directed and produced "The Passion of the Christ" film, not because of the film's violent depiction of Jesus Christ's final hours. Instead, they say the film is historically inaccurate because Jesus is portrayed as a white man, not a black man.

"Strangely absent from the debate is one very basic inaccuracy which has been long promoted in order to bolster white supremacy and maintain a revisionist history that is beneficial to only people of European descent," said Malik Z. Shabazz, national chairman of the New Black Panther Party in a statement Tuesday.

"This purposely omitted fact is that Jesus was not a European white man. Jesus Christ was a black man - a dark skinned Hebrew Israelite from Northern Africa and even the only Biblical physical description confirms this (Rev. 13:20)," said Shabazz.

"Not only does this film wrongfully depict Christ as white but all the disciples and Israelites are people of European descent, which presents a historical and physical impossibility," he added.

The New Black Panther Party and other black activists plan to stage protests nationwide over the controversy. Not only does the group claim the movie is "false," but also "harmful and racist."

The Anti-Defamation League recently expressed to Gibson its concern that the film would drum up anti-Semetism. Shabazz said his group disagrees with the ADL's claims that the film is "anti-semetic" and challenged the ADL to "deny the historical accuracy of the Jews' attack on Christ."

But Shabazz says, the "true controversy" surrounding the film "lies in the maligned history of African people through the world and the continual inaccuracies presented in every Hollywood production to date of any Biblical story from the 10 Commandments to the Christmas Story."

"These false images presented are 'anti-black' and these false images and interpretations only seek to further the racist and white supremist idea that God and Jesus Christ 'The Messiah' or 'Savior' is European and white," he added.

"This is clearly one more example of how black people in this country are treated unfairly. Black/African history has and continues to be misrepresented, black people worldwide are subjected to the psychologically abusive images of white supremacy and have no collective voice to defend or promote a Black agenda," Shabazz concluded.

Movie 'not racist,' says black conservative

But Rev. Jesse Peterson, president of the black conservative group, B.O.N.D. (Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny) said claims that Jesus is black takes away from the overall message.

Peterson said he saw the movie last weekend and "there's nothing in this movie that is racist at all."

"It was inspiring spiritually," he said. "I think that it's gonna reconfirm the faith in many Christians and it's gonna encourage those who had doubt about Christ. There will be many, I believe, that will believe in him. I knew that this thing would come out that 'he wasn't black' and that 'it's racist.' It's not."

Peterson explained that "the Bible clearly states that Christ was in Israel and that he was a Jew." The movie, he said "clearly points that out as well."

Peterson said to "cry racism is a non-issue. This is an attempt for attention. It's shameful to make that kind of assertion about this movie."

When asked specifically whether Shabazz's physical description of Jesus and his birthplace of Northern Africa was accurate, Peterson said, "I've heard that over and over again, and at one point when I resented white Americans, I believed that too."

But, he said, "in all honesty there is no, I think, perfect description of what Christ looked like anyway, and I think that each race…the white race at one point said that he looked white [with] blue eyes and blond hair. That wasn't true. The blacks are trying to claim him…Hispanics, everybody are trying to claim him as their own."

Peterson said that's why the Scripture clearly states "'do not create a graven image of him, because it will divide and cause confusion.'

"The most important thing is that he was a spirit. It's the spirit of the man, not necessarily what he looked like. And that's the focus that this movie brings out," Peterson said, adding that he thinks blacks and white are likely to focus on Jesus' "spirit rather than the color."

He said the Bible does point out that Jesus was "born in that area, but still he was a Jew, and at that time, maybe they didn't have the straight hair, but it doesn't mean he was…a black, African man."

Peterson said in the movie, Jesus is a dark-skinned man, not white with blue eyes, but a dark-skinned man. "He's not black, but he's not white either," he said.

Race not an issue

Peterson took the New Black Panther Party to task for making Jesus' race an issue.

"It's a shame that you have racist organizations like the New Black Panther Party that will come out and allow the devil or darkness to use them, because that's what's happening," he said. "It's a distraction. It's a trick of the devil to come out and call this movie racist…that he was black, he had nappy hair. That's a distraction."

Peterson believes the group is taking away from the spiritual message of the movie, a message, he said that can possibly help people that are hurting spiritually.

"I think that when people go to this movie, they need to look beyond the color. And I think most will, whether they want to or not…look at the spirit and the suffering that Christ went through," Peterson said.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackpanthers; christ; christians; jessepeterson; newblackpantherparty; racebaiting; racialdivision; racism; thepassion; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-249 last
To: GigaDittos
I suppose Momar Khadafi is black too. Bwoohhahahahahaha!!!

Along with Egyptian military officer turned Palestinian leader, Yasser Arafat, lol.

241 posted on 02/26/2004 8:03:13 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Yep!
242 posted on 02/26/2004 8:58:34 AM PST by R. Scott (My cynicism rises with the proximity of the elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Yep!
243 posted on 02/26/2004 8:58:59 AM PST by R. Scott (My cynicism rises with the proximity of the elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I've come to the conclusion that the whole article is one big typo. :)
244 posted on 02/26/2004 9:13:30 AM PST by scott7278 ("...but speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in all aspects into Him..." Eph. 4:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"a dark skinned Hebrew Israelite from Northern Africa "

This blather from black racists NEVER stops.

"All the Egyptians were black. All North Africans were and are black. Hebrews were black because they came from Egypt. The Greeks learned everything from black Egyptians. Hannibal was black. If someone isn't a blonde, blue-eyed Norweigan, they are, by definition black."


Personally, Jesus' Life and message were more important than his skin pigmentation or lack therof.

But for the benefit of the black racists out there, if there are any, the Hebrews were Semites. The Semites were Caucasoids. That means that they had Caucasian features, not Negroid features (sorry to use that term, but "black" and "white" simply have no real releveance in this discourse.) North Africans that lived along the Mediterranean were also Caucasoids, not Negroid. Hannibal was a Cathaginian. Carthaginians were Phoenician colonists in North Africa, and hence were Semites and Caucasoids, not Negroids. The Ancient Egyptians were mainly Caucasoids, but there was a strong Negroid element present, especially in the southern part near Kush - modern day Sudan and southern Egypt. There was even a black pharaonic dynastry but they were from Kush. Looking at Egyptian statuary and paintings, the people were Caucasiod and Negroid. The Ancient Egyptians usually painted themselves brown or red-brown for Egyptian men and yellow or white for Egyptian women. When they meant to portray Negroid Ancient Egyptians or Kushites, you could tell clearly from their appearance. And then there were obvious mixtures of the two, some of which appear even as pharoahs.

The Berbers, the indigenous people of northern Africa along the Mediterranean Coast were Caucasoid, so were the ancient Libyans.

Having said all that, these people had darker complections than most Europeans and dark hair and eyes, although there were exceptions at both ends of the pigmentation spectrum - people moved around even back then, and miscegenation was not considered a crime or looked down upon in any way.
For instance, the Ancient Egyptians did not view the world in terms of black and white, but in terms of Egyptian ans Non-Egyptian. And Moses had a Kushite wife.

I wish these idiot racists would crawl back under whatever rock they were hiding under. They have more in common with the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Nation than they would like to admit. The only distinction lies in pigmentation, not thought processes.
245 posted on 02/26/2004 9:44:47 AM PST by ZULU (GOD BLESS SENATOR McCARTHY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
sorry to use that term, but "black" and "white" simply have no real releveance in this discourse

Thanks! And a very good post. The racists on both the Negroid and Caucasian sides really do try to paint everything, even God.
246 posted on 02/27/2004 1:09:54 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

Comment #247 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks

They could have settled the fracas by giving Al Sharpton an extras part. ;-)


248 posted on 07/12/2004 12:48:32 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #249 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-249 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson