Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Mr. Sowell, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, is the author, most recently, of "Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy, Revised and Expanded," just published by Basic Books.
1 posted on 02/24/2004 2:01:58 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The Raven
WOW can this guy write, so a simple person can understand something, THANK YOU Dr. Sowell
2 posted on 02/24/2004 2:39:39 AM PST by Phyto Chems (What part of "illegal" don't they understand... :-)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
What Mr. Reagan's "tax cuts for the rich" actually cut were the tax rates per dollar of income. Out of rising incomes, the country as a whole -- including the rich -- paid more total taxes than ever before.

Exactly, a lower tax rate is a more affordable tax rate.
4 posted on 02/24/2004 2:47:05 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
I predict that the Democrats will successfully use the 'job exports' phobia to win this fall.


BUMP

5 posted on 02/24/2004 2:51:54 AM PST by tm22721 (May the UN rest in peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Econ 101 bump.
6 posted on 02/24/2004 2:54:44 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Because Socialists don't think (they react), the impact of taxes on their own lives and the lives of their devotees has never been fully understood by these primitives.

Consider this:

If one is poor, AND DESIRES TO BE WEALTHIER, it will happen over time.

If there are higher taxes, it will take more time, as government intervenes to shutdown your wealth accumulation and stem your growth.

Lower taxes means achieving your wealth goals sooner.

What part of this escapes the Communist monkeys?

The part about desiring wealth.

Socialists don't want wealth themselves - they only want to prevent YOU from acquiring it.

Socialism is simply disguised envy.
7 posted on 02/24/2004 2:57:48 AM PST by Stallone (Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
The shame of it is capitalism needs to be taught in every school at every level every day. But it isn't that is why the collectivists' sophistry continues to beguile a seemingly always ignorant public.

Tax rates and revenues are connected just like any other rate/revenue relationship. If higher rates translated into higher revenues, Ford would be charging $1 million per Taurus. But it can't and it knows why. Even in unregulated monoply situations there is a price that maximizes revenues.

12 posted on 02/24/2004 3:50:20 AM PST by laredo44 (liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Nobel Laureates Milton Friedman and Gary Becker are other such exceptions in addressing a wider general audience, rather than confining what they say to technical analysis addressed to fellow economists and their students.

Of course, modesty prevented him from doing so, but the author could have added his own name to this depressingly short list.
16 posted on 02/24/2004 5:49:35 AM PST by frossca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
"Demagoguery beats data".

Lou Dobbs of CNN has a new show title.
17 posted on 02/24/2004 6:06:35 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole; harpseal; RaceBannon; nutmeg; Clemenza; PARodrig
ping
18 posted on 02/24/2004 6:30:06 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
"Mr. Sowell, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, is the author, most recently, of "Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy, Revised and Expanded," just published by Basic Books."

If you've read it, how is it? Thanks for the post, btw.

19 posted on 02/24/2004 6:42:12 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Yeah, but who cares the only thing that matters is how I "feel" about these issues.

Here Dr Sowell tries vainly to have a ray of light penetrate the deliberately spread darkness of the RATmedia liars. Even here there are those claiming that NAFTA has cost us jobs.

What chance does the voice of truth have against the cacophony of lying ignorance spread 24/7 by the RATmedia?
20 posted on 02/24/2004 6:43:03 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
In reality, the number of jobs in the U.S. increased by millions after Nafta went into effect and the unemployment rate fell to low levels not seen in years. Behind the radically wrong predictions was a simple confusion between wage rates and labor costs,

Since Mr Sowell bemoans demagoguery beating date shouldn't he supply some statistics (data) along with this statement? Like how many jobs were created as a result of NAFTA and how many were lost as a result of NAFTA? And how much did our trade surplus with Mexico increase?

25 posted on 02/24/2004 8:03:34 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
>>>>>>>What Mr. Reagan's "tax cuts for the rich" actually cut were the tax rates per dollar of income. Out of rising incomes, the country as a whole -- including the rich -- paid more total taxes than ever before.

Beautiful. Sowell reasons this out so well. This explains, with simple elegance, why the Laffer Curve is parabolic in shape and that raising taxes does not guarantee an increase in government revenue.
27 posted on 02/24/2004 8:13:53 AM PST by .cnI redruM (At the end of the day, information has finite value and may only come at a significant price.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
It is a wholly different ball game when hundreds of millions of people individually keep track of the relatively few prices they need to know for their own decision-making in a market economy.

the fingers of The Invisible Hand do the walking.

great piece. hope someone can make a sound-byte out of it.

34 posted on 02/24/2004 10:13:39 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
This guy is a national treasure. He makes economics so approachable even I get it.
36 posted on 02/25/2004 5:36:19 AM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
”Those who complain loudly about how many jobs have been "exported" to other countries because of international free trade totally ignore all the jobs that have been imported to the American economy because of that same free trade. Siemens alone employs tens of thousands of American workers and Toyota has already produced its ten millionth car in the U.S. Management guru Peter Drucker has said that this country imports far more jobs than it exports and no one has contradicted him. Indeed, those who are loudest in denouncing the exporting of jobs totally ignore the importing of jobs. “

This is the most important message in this article. Point this out to your friends and family and spread the word. If the fact that we import more jobs than we export sinks into the American consciousness then this nonsense about exporting jobs to India et al will hopefully whither on the vine even if it doesn't sink into Ralph Nader's thick skull.

39 posted on 02/25/2004 5:48:21 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson