Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low Taxes Do What? [WSJ:Sowell]
Wall Street Journal ^ | Feb 24, 2004 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 02/24/2004 2:01:58 AM PST by The Raven

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:09 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Some years ago, the distinguished international-trade economist Jagdish Bhagwati was visiting Cornell University, giving a lecture to graduate students during the day and debating Ralph Nader on free trade that evening. During his lecture, Prof. Bhagwati asked how many of the graduate students would be attending that evening's debate. Not one hand went up.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bushtaxcuts; sowell; taxes; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
My son recently came home from his highschool social studies lecture telling me he had learned today that welfare helps to stimulate the economy.
21 posted on 02/24/2004 6:46:01 AM PST by My back yard (The world is changed; I can feel it in the water, in the earth, I can smell it in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: templar; hedgetrimmer
An interesting article by Thomas Sowell.
22 posted on 02/24/2004 7:40:22 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: My back yard
I was wondering what they mean by "social studies."
Is that history?
23 posted on 02/24/2004 7:41:43 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
It's funny that the socialists call the free market capitalists "greedy" for wanting to keep more of what they earn -

when in reality, it's the socialists that want to use the lethal force of government to confiscate the wealth of those who earn it.

THAT'S greedy.
24 posted on 02/24/2004 7:42:56 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
In reality, the number of jobs in the U.S. increased by millions after Nafta went into effect and the unemployment rate fell to low levels not seen in years. Behind the radically wrong predictions was a simple confusion between wage rates and labor costs,

Since Mr Sowell bemoans demagoguery beating date shouldn't he supply some statistics (data) along with this statement? Like how many jobs were created as a result of NAFTA and how many were lost as a result of NAFTA? And how much did our trade surplus with Mexico increase?

25 posted on 02/24/2004 8:03:34 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
it's the socialists that want to use the lethal force of government to confiscate the wealth of those who earn it.

That pretty much applies to whoever controls government at the time, not just socialists. How it is used is more the question between socialists and other social/economic philosophies than the taking of it.

26 posted on 02/24/2004 8:06:43 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
>>>>>>>What Mr. Reagan's "tax cuts for the rich" actually cut were the tax rates per dollar of income. Out of rising incomes, the country as a whole -- including the rich -- paid more total taxes than ever before.

Beautiful. Sowell reasons this out so well. This explains, with simple elegance, why the Laffer Curve is parabolic in shape and that raising taxes does not guarantee an increase in government revenue.
27 posted on 02/24/2004 8:13:53 AM PST by .cnI redruM (At the end of the day, information has finite value and may only come at a significant price.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: templar
"How it is used is more the question between socialists and other social/economic philosophies than the taking of it."

There's plenty of truth in that. However, IMO, the tradition of individual freedom that is the basis for the founding of our country does not include a central government controlling and regulating private wealth. Socialism, OTOH, by definition most certainly does do this in its milder forms, taken to its logical end, socialism does not even allow private wealth.

So I think it pretty clear that conservative views of taxes differ significantly from leftist. Or should.

28 posted on 02/24/2004 8:25:19 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Didn't Siemens just announce they were shutting down operations here and moving elsewhere?

Sowell claims that foreign car manufacturers that build cars here are imported jobs. They build cars here to sell here. The cars are not being built here and shipped back to the corporations country of origin.

The jobs going to India and China are building products there to sell here,not to sell in their country. Their products are for export back here. There's a big difference in this.
29 posted on 02/24/2004 8:43:39 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
There is a plain definition in the Constitution where the line from allowable "common good" spending to the illegal socialist spending.

Congress spends the tax money, and it may only be spent on those items listed in Article I, Section 8 - as the founders intended.

I know that blows a lot of things that everyone thinks they are entitled to - Social Security, Medicare, etc,
but "them's the rules."
30 posted on 02/24/2004 8:56:18 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
"Give me your children"......remember that? So we now have teachers who do not realize they are teaching socialism/communism to the kids. Getting back to the kerrys, the kenedys the clintons and their socialist/communist beliefs. Do you think x42/#97 will give up one tenth of either of their houses to someone poor, will kerry give Terea's $$$$ to someone who is poor, will kenedy give anything of whatever his father built away? I think not. Lenin was very clever when he encouraged his minions to invade our schools, universities and colleges of learning and even our government. He has spread his beliefs into every phase of America. It's up to some of us to curtail these beliefs as best we can and eventually, hopefully, America as she should be will return. "Inititive of the Individual for prosperity".
31 posted on 02/24/2004 9:18:40 AM PST by tillacum (President Bush and our Military will defeat the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Sure, it's pretty clear that the founding fathers didn't mean to create the leviathan that now poses as our government. The Left doesn't think the state has enough power even now, though.
32 posted on 02/24/2004 9:34:47 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: My back yard
I hope you complained to the Principal and wrote a letter to the editor(s) of your local newspaper(s).
33 posted on 02/24/2004 10:07:24 AM PST by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
It is a wholly different ball game when hundreds of millions of people individually keep track of the relatively few prices they need to know for their own decision-making in a market economy.

the fingers of The Invisible Hand do the walking.

great piece. hope someone can make a sound-byte out of it.

34 posted on 02/24/2004 10:13:39 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My back yard
...My son recently came home from his highschool social studies lecture telling me he had learned today that welfare helps to stimulate the economy...

The social studies teacher probably researched the topic by reading "The Nation" magazine instead of an Economics text.

35 posted on 02/24/2004 11:40:16 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
This guy is a national treasure. He makes economics so approachable even I get it.
36 posted on 02/25/2004 5:36:19 AM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The cars are not being built here and shipped back to the corporations country of origin.

My father-in-law worked at Honda (in central Ohio) until his retirement ths past year.

Honda makes plenty of right-hand drive Accords along side the American versions. These right-hand drive cars are all sent back to Japan for consumption.

37 posted on 02/25/2004 5:48:11 AM PST by GreenAccord (Democracy is a sheep and two wolves voting on what's for dinner. We live in a republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
Socialists don't want wealth themselves - they only want to prevent YOU from acquiring it.

The statement is half right... socialists want to prevent you from acquiring wealth.

The have no such qualms about becoming wealthy themselves. In fact socialists wish to become wealthy by forcibly directing you on how you can spend yours.

38 posted on 02/25/2004 5:48:14 AM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
”Those who complain loudly about how many jobs have been "exported" to other countries because of international free trade totally ignore all the jobs that have been imported to the American economy because of that same free trade. Siemens alone employs tens of thousands of American workers and Toyota has already produced its ten millionth car in the U.S. Management guru Peter Drucker has said that this country imports far more jobs than it exports and no one has contradicted him. Indeed, those who are loudest in denouncing the exporting of jobs totally ignore the importing of jobs. “

This is the most important message in this article. Point this out to your friends and family and spread the word. If the fact that we import more jobs than we export sinks into the American consciousness then this nonsense about exporting jobs to India et al will hopefully whither on the vine even if it doesn't sink into Ralph Nader's thick skull.

39 posted on 02/25/2004 5:48:21 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
Socialists don't want wealth themselves - they only want to prevent YOU from acquiring it

Can't help but wonder if the latter part of that statement is what motivates George Soros.

40 posted on 02/29/2004 9:21:54 AM PST by P.O.E. (D@mned if you do, Dem'd if you don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson