Skip to comments.
Ralph Nader Announces Run for Presidency (Dems must be fuming!!!)
Yahoo! News ^
| February 22, 2004
| SAM HANANEL
Posted on 02/22/2004 12:21:48 PM PST by El Conservador
WASHINGTON - Consumer advocate Ralph Nader (news - web sites) announced Sunday he will run again for the presidency, declaring that Washington has become "corporate occupied territory" and arguing there is too little difference between the Democratic and Republican parties.
"This country has more problems and injustices than it deserves," Nader said, bemoaning a "democracy gap." Nader, who turns 70 this week, said he wants to "challenge this two-party duopoly."
"There's too much power and wealth in too few hands," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
"Washington is now corporate occupied territory," Nader said. "There is now a for-sale sign on most agencies and departments. ... Basically, it's question of both parties flunking."
He decided against running under the banner of the Green Party. Nader's candidacy four years ago has been blamed by many Democrats for costing Al Gore (news - web sites) the election against Bush.
Democratic National Committee (news - web sites) chairman Terry McAuliffe, who has personally urged Nader not to run, said Nader would not have the same impact this time.
"I can tell you Green Party members are all coming into the (Democratic) party saying they want to help us because they know the stakes are so big this time," he said on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"It will be much more difficult for him," McAuliffe said.
Republicans largely have declined to comment on any benefits a Nader candidacy would have for Bush.
"If Ralph Nader runs, President Bush (news - web sites) is going to be re-elected and if Ralph Nader doesn't run, President Bush is going to be re-elected," Republican National Committee (news - web sites) chairman Ed Gillespie said on CBS"s "Face the Nation."
At a Sunday gathering of governors in Washington, former RNC chairman Haley Barbour, now governor of Mississippi said: "It will make less difference than the Democrats fear, but I know they're very nervous about it."
Asked if he was getting into the race to be a spoiler, Nader replied: "A spoiler is a contemptuous term, as if anybody who dares to challenge the two party system .. is a spoiler, and we've got to fight that.."
"Let me say, this is going to be difficult," said Nader, who planned a round of interviews after his announcement. But he also said, "This is not a democracy that can be controlled by two parties in the grip of corporate interests."
Third party candidacies have been a greater part of presidential politics in recent years; businessman Ross Perot (news - web sites) twice ran for president, winning 19 percent of the vote in 1992.
"It's his personal vanity because he has no movement. Nobody's backing him," New Mexico Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson said.
As the Green Party's nominee in 2000, Nader appeared on the ballot in 43 states and Washington, D.C., garnering only 2.7 percent of the vote. But in Florida and New Hampshire, Bush won such narrow victories that had Gore received the bulk of Nader's votes in those states, he would have won the general election.
___
Associated Press writer Robert Tanner contributed to this report.
___
On the Net:
Nader 2004 Presidential Exploratory Committee: http://www.naderexplore04.org
TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; greenparty; nader; ralph; ralphnader
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Yay!!!
The more, the merrier!!!
To: El Conservador
Wasn't it Michael Moore who had a whale over Nader, in 2000?
2
posted on
02/22/2004 12:35:20 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: El Conservador
Three cheers for every Freeper who freeped Ralphie, urging him to run!
Hip, Hip, Hooray!
Hip, Hip, Hooray!
Hip, Hip, Hooray!
3
posted on
02/22/2004 12:36:07 PM PST
by
Killborn
(I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint. (Another win for FR!))
To: Killborn
Now all we need is Hillarious to run.
4
posted on
02/22/2004 12:37:00 PM PST
by
Killborn
(I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint. (Another win for FR!))
To: El Conservador
Nadar was blasting congress as corporate whores today and most of his remarks seemed to be against Kerry !
5
posted on
02/22/2004 12:37:08 PM PST
by
america-rules
(It's US or THEM so what part don't you understand ?)
To: Killborn
The best that she can do is to waddle.
6
posted on
02/22/2004 12:37:43 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: america-rules
![](http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20040222/capt.sge.mmj00.220204183308.photo00.default-258x380.jpg)
Mad-Eye Nader strikes again!
7
posted on
02/22/2004 12:38:42 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: Paul Atreides
LOL, good one! :)
8
posted on
02/22/2004 12:39:23 PM PST
by
Killborn
(I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint. (Another win for FR!))
To: All
Oh Yeah! GO RALPH GO!
I wonder how DU is taking the news? LOL!
To: El Conservador
"It's his personal vanity because he has no movement. Nobody's backing him," New Mexico Democratic Gov. Horatio Sanz whined, realizing his dream of being asked to the prom just died.
To: Paul Atreides
LOL, good one! :)
11
posted on
02/22/2004 12:40:19 PM PST
by
Killborn
(I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint. (Another win for FR!))
"Republicans largely have declined to comment on any benefits a Nader candidacy would have for Bush."
They were too busy laughing.
12
posted on
02/22/2004 12:44:23 PM PST
by
Killborn
(I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint.)
To: mabelkitty
This is the question I have. IF.. as the demos say, ralphie has no support, why are they mad about him running? If there is negative support, it shouldn't matter, should it??
13
posted on
02/22/2004 12:45:38 PM PST
by
Armedanddangerous
(The first rule of gunfighting is to have a gun...more than one, if possible..)
To: Paul Atreides
You sure that isn't Sid Caesar?
14
posted on
02/22/2004 12:51:30 PM PST
by
tet68
To: Killborn
NOT LIKELY. BUT, HOW ABOUT LET'S URGE DR. HOWIE TO FORM HIS OWN 3RD PARTY AND RUN. IF NOT, LET'S START A CAMPAIGN TO GET THE DEANIACS TO BACK RALPHIE WITH THEIR MONEY AND VOTES.
WHAT SAY YE?
15
posted on
02/22/2004 12:51:31 PM PST
by
no dems
To: no dems
Excellent. Split the vote anyway we can. I'LL DO IT! :)
16
posted on
02/22/2004 12:53:42 PM PST
by
Killborn
(I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint.)
To: COEXERJ145
DU's going insane, expect mass suicides over there soon.
17
posted on
02/22/2004 12:54:43 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Paul Atreides
Michael Moore IS a whale; but you are correct.
18
posted on
02/22/2004 12:57:10 PM PST
by
Rocko
To: Monty22
Since he's running as an independent, he may gain more of that vote. FREEPERS who live in Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Ohio, Tennessee, Arkansas, and West Virginia must get him on the ballot.
To: TheEaglehasLanded
Yep, we need him to be the Ross Perot of this election, this time to help Bush in the swing states.
20
posted on
02/22/2004 1:03:33 PM PST
by
Monty22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson