Skip to comments.
Willie Brown: CA will demand full faith and credit for gay marriages from ALL states
Scarborough County
Posted on 02/20/2004 7:30:51 PM PST by wadeintothem
During Scarborough Country interview (buchanan ick) and Willie Brown (ugh) said that after CA adopts Newsomes edict on Gay Marriage, CA will demand recognition of the gay marriages from all states under the full faith and credit clause.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: anarchy; counterfeitmarriage; cultureofdeath; culturewar; deliverusfromevil; fauxmarriages; fraudmarriage; gaymirage; goodvsevil; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualsdemand; lawlessness; liberalsdemand; marriage; prisoners; protectmarriage; romans1; samesexmarriage; tyrantsdemand; wagesofsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-196 next last
To: philetus
I'm a lawyer.
To: Brownell
These corrupt politicians and judges are the result of 30 to 40 years of liberals laying the groundwork for a complete subversion of society. It was started by Antonio Gramsci in the 1920s, when he mapped the way to communism via the incremental destruction of Western culture. His ideological heirs, the Frankfurt school, were chased into America by the NAZIs. Here, the Frankfurt school, particularly Fromm and Marcuse, combined with Roosevelt's Stalinist apologists with the objective of fully infecting the universities. It took hold in the 60s and bled into our institutions from there.
162
posted on
02/21/2004 6:31:57 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: torchthemummy
"You have, at this point, nearly two weeks of flouting of state law. The governor feels that we've come to a point where we're starting down a dangerous path and it leads to anarchy at some point," said Rob Stutzman, Schwarzenegger's communications director. "It's time for this to end." You can bet your last nickel that, when this little gambit is shut down, the resulting gay riot in San Francisco is already planned. Communists never miss a trick.
It was time for it to end last Tuesday morning. Lockyer won't do a damn thing and Schwarzenegger knows it. The California State Attoreny General controls all law enforcement in the State. The only enforcement tool Arnold has is the National Guard.
163
posted on
02/21/2004 6:42:41 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Brownell
Lockyer, an elected Democrat who is a potential candidate in the 2006 governor's race, already has said that he plans to vigorously defend the state in the lawsuit San Francisco's city attorney brought Thursday that challenged California's marriage laws on constitutional grounds. Lockyer is lying. He has control of every law enforcement apparatus in the State. He could have shut down that courthouse in hours. He's playing this like a fish.
164
posted on
02/21/2004 6:45:00 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Howlin
You mean you've still got one? I think my last one was used up by the ludicrous "he deserted" pile of ca-ca put out by the jackass party.
165
posted on
02/21/2004 6:57:26 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: novacation
Someone should do the following to jam the leftists:
Take a cat, dog or your favorite pet to the place where they are issuing marriage licenses. Make sure you have alerted the media beforehand that you are going to demand a license which SF will deny. Demand a license. When they deny the license make sure you use their tag line that you have a "right to be married and the state doesn't have the right to tell you who or what you can marry and they are discriminating against you based on your preference" Voila, then you bring a legal action to compel them to issue the license. This jams their theory because once they are forced to say that the state can determine what a marriage is then their argument is to quote "in their face"
To: Carry_Okie
I can't stop laughing, trying to imagine what a gay riot would be like. Can they really do a good job of rioting if it musses their hair or breaks one of their high heels?
Yeah, I know, I'm being bad...
167
posted on
02/21/2004 7:02:07 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: mewzilla
168
posted on
02/21/2004 7:09:49 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: MizSterious
Try "White Night," the evening after Dan White was acquitted of the first degree murder of Supervisor Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone, the famed "twinkie defense." It was one nasty riot.
Gays are actually prone to violence. It was true in Berlin in the 1930s and it's true now. The incidence of domestic violence in gay relationships is very high.
169
posted on
02/21/2004 7:12:29 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: technomage
Growing up in Northern California (Placer County), I vaguely remember an initiative to break CA up into two states. Counties along the proposed border, one of which I lived in, were given the option of choosing which proposed state they would be part of.
Everything was hunky-dory until they got to the Gay Area. Neither proposed state wanted San Francisco County, so the whole idea kind of died.
170
posted on
02/21/2004 7:15:37 AM PST
by
Doohickey
(The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
To: SouthernFreebird
CA will demand recognition of the gay marriages from all states under the full faith and credit clause.Which is precisely why leaving this up to the states will not work. The Bush Administration needs to get involved now, and nip this in the bud.
To: HitmanNY
So, if a homosexual couple of divergent ages have the older one retire as a high wage earner and the younger one as a lower wage earner ("preformance" artist, say), will US Social Security take a bigger hit from these marriages?
To: KC Burke
Hard to say - since the phenomenon isn't exclusive to same-sex couples, my guess would be the effect will be pretty much the same as male/femal sex couples in that respect.
But any guesses would be speculative, we will find out if it ever comes to pass (not in our lifetimes, I think - the mistake the movement is making is that they are overplaying their hand and alienating a lot of people. This is a huge loser for their cause. I can't explain their aggressiveness on fronts like this - it's borderline suicidal and will turn homosexual causes back a decade because they are ticking too many people off.
173
posted on
02/21/2004 7:31:08 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: Brilliant
2 legs, 2 arms . . . . thinking . . . .
wellllll . . . thinking . . .
How about in common with DC? . . .
. . . and an over abundance of vacuum heads, ____-heads
. . . an vast over abundance of traitors . . .
. . . a vast over abundance of hedonist's who think their construction on reality is flawless while it is actually being upside down in a cess pool.
. . . a vast over abundance of idiots who love to go around giving God the finger and pretending He doesn't notice, doesn't care or doesn't exist.
. . . given the innovative scientist's accurate predictions of a number of quakes in recent years . . . and his prediction of a big one to hit CA before Sept something . . . it appears to me the San Fran mayor is screaming to God:
SOCK IT TO ME.
He may just be surprised at the response.
174
posted on
02/21/2004 7:46:42 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: wadeintothem
Old Brown, Willie is at it again!
175
posted on
02/21/2004 7:48:11 AM PST
by
verity
To: tapatio
That would kind of figure . . .
Ed Asssner's nephew.
176
posted on
02/21/2004 7:49:32 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: dc-zoo
Yes, there's got to be a breaking point somewhere.
And, this sin-sick world has almost reached it.
And all that can be shaken, will be shaken.
And, at some point, there will even be a new heaven and a new earth.
'Twixt now and then . . . lots of blood will flow because man refused to accept the blood that flowed so lovingly at Calvary.
177
posted on
02/21/2004 7:55:19 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: wilmington2
Where are the churches on this issue. The only public objector I hear is Jerry Falwell.
The priests have their own problems at the moment.
178
posted on
02/21/2004 8:01:58 AM PST
by
Lynda
To: HitmanNY
Quite simply, as I have said, when a couple gets married in one state, and if they go to another state, they remain married...How does the Defense of Marriage Act fit into this? Would it be declared unconstitutional?
January 16, 1997 - President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act. This Act is important because it will allow a state to choose not to recognize a same-sex "marriage" performed in another state.
To: Lady Eileen
Exactly!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-196 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson