Posted on 02/19/2004 6:03:16 AM PST by thesummerwind
Mail arrives, telling me that by going to Mexico I have sold out, fled, abandoned the United States. Im a coward, some of my correspondents say, and a traitor, just like Lord Haw Haw, Kim Philby, Jane Fonda. Im probably a devotee of Quisling. (Actually Ive never quizzled in my life.)
(OK, OK, Im sorry.)
Anyway, theyre upset, which is irrational. They think that just because I went to Mexico, I left the US. They dont understand. I didnt leave the United States. It left me. It was a bait-and-switch operation. I signed on to one country, and they slipped another in under me. I want my money back.
In the country where I grew up, if you found a naked intruder in your daughters bedroom with a Bowie knife and a hard-on, you shot him and arranged to have the rugs cleaned. The sheriff wasnt greatly interested and the country prosecutor didnt see anything to prosecute. The scum floating on the gene pool wasnt a protected species. It wasnt the driving engine of the culture. It was just scum.
Today you would be charged with the use of excessive force. The cadavers family would sue. They would end up with your house unless they just ran you broke with legal bills. The outcome would depend on the racial make-up of you, the intruder, and the jury. Your daughter would be married with grandchildren before the courts reached any conclusion.
Think Im exaggerating? When I used to have the police beat for the Washington Times in the Yankee capital, the cops told me, dead serious, that if I ever shot an intruder, I should shoot him again to make sure: You cant afford to have two stories, they said, especially if hes black which, in Washington, was a foregone conclusion. Theyll hang you, said the cops.
In the country I grew up in, you got on an airplane by walking up these funny little steps with wheels on them. Then you sat down. Thats all you did. I know, I know: You dont believe this. Its true. You just walked on. Further, the stewardesses were not merely civil butso help mefriendly. Flying was actually enjoyable. The seats were big enough that you didnt sit with your knees beside your ears and your feet in your pockets.
Now, getting aboard is like going into max security at some ghastly penitentiary. I once flew a bit around the old Soviet Union, as distinct from the new one, on a junket. Security was less oppressive, though the food was marginally worse unless you liked green chicken. The service was just as sullen.
Maybe thats what I miss most about the Old Country. People were courteous. They could afford to be because everyone else was too. Its hard to be pleasant when the odds are even that the next person you deal with will be an ill-mannered lout who knows he can get away with it.
I think people were courteous also because they lived in an agreeable country and were pretty happy with things. The new country seems angryquietly so, not sure what to do about it, but looking for someone to hit.
Yet further still, in the old country they didnt have these funny little Japanese cars with itsy-bitsy four-bangers. Nope. They had great virile monsters thirty feet long with eight huge cylinders like buckets. A dog could have slept in them. Sure, those rocket-barges were probably ridiculous and left a trail of parts that fell off because quality control wasnt that great, but they were real cars. They embodied a spirit I liked. Today cars seem to be designed with transvestites in mind.
The Old Country the music was vibrant, vigorous, much of it springing from the great black bluesmen of Mississippi and then Chicago, some of it from the mountains and the jazz dens of the big cities. In the music of the new country, the whites whine and the blacks grunt angrily. From Tampa Red to rap is a long way down.
In the country I signed on to, things worked on the principle of individual responsibility. If you robbed a bank, which people generally didnt, everyone figured you did it because you decided to, and you went to jail and everyone was satisfied, except you, which was the idea. Most people knew how to behave, and did. It saved a lot on police departments and you could walk around at night.
In the new country of course everything is somebody elses fault, unless you are a white male, in which case everything is your fault. Never mind that if it werent for white males everybody else would be living on low-hanging fruit and saying ugga-wugga because they couldnt figure out how to make a hemi-head big-block to crash into things with. Or figure out how to make anything else.
In the old country, the government was pretty much benign or actually useful. It built roads and largely left you alone. The public schools were not great but neither were they terrible. People ran their own lives. The federal government tended to be somewhere else, which was a splendid place for it, and you mostly didnt notice.
In the country that is now where America used to be, the government is the cause of most major problems instead of a solution, however inefficient, to a fair number of them. The government keeps you from educating your children, holds standards down, prevents you from hiring the best people you can find to work in your business. It wont allow local jurisdictions to control crime, prevents localities from enforcing such moral standards as they see fit, virtually illegalizes the religion, of most of the population, and generally wont permit people to live as they like.
Now, I used to be fond of the United States. Granted, I wasnt much of a patriot. The word nowadays seems to mean one who doesnt so much love his country as to dislike other peoples. I figured live and let live. A lot of other countries struck me as fine places. But America was my favorite. It just suited me. I liked the people in their wild variety and the countryside and the music and the brash independence. It wasnt perfect. Still, given the sorry baseline for comportment in human agglomerations, it was about as good as you could get.
Im still fond of the United States. I just cant find it.
Fred was once published in the generally conservative Washington Times (not to be confused with the Stalinist Washinton comPost), but found the editorial strictures even there to be a bit too strict. So now he self-publishes.
I was reading an article of his on his site from September, 2003. He was going to be out of town, so he wrote his readers:
PS: I'll be in Thailand most of October, but will endeavor to produce lies and distortion from thence. Fred"
LOL!
You're welcome. I started reading him this morning, and can't stop. He's a sicko, and I mean that as a compliment.
And that's a good thing.
:)
But, from what I've read of his, and it isn't too much yet, he really could use just a little edge to show that he isn't so terribly cynical and jaded, IMO.
But, as Butch Cassidy used to say when he glumly noticed the old, quaint banks all "securitied-up", "Small price to pay for beauty."
LOL!
But for someone who is smart, especially a guy like this who really knows better, it is frustrating. Why leave when you can fix it?
Yeh, you're right on this. But I think he'll be back to contribute, but if not, I think his writing is a large enough contribution.
And, I think this guy's writings will be greatly received and reknowned in the future, and in that manner, will serve a purpose to the country. I just sent away for his book, "Nekkid in Austin".
Has anyone here read it?
One need only note that Fred Reed left the US for Mexico -- hardly a beacon of hope for those who yearn for the good old days.
Why did he really leave? Probably because he can go to Mexico and be rich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.