[expatguy]

The end is near.

[Starcutter]

I must agree with this article when it points out what may happen in our liberal public school system. With the mainstream media openly supporting the gay lifestyle and the schools more than willing to embrace it we are heading down a very slippery slope here. Our children are very impressionable and many will take to this kind of behavior just because it is seen as "in style". Others will embrace it because they have no parents teaching them different.

[Always Right]

And since at age 6 he probably hasn't yet discovered his sexual "identity," the fair thing will be to present all angles to him in language, health, music and social studies.

That's a fact the liberals know but will never admit, sexuality develops. It is an absolute lie to say that your sexual attractions are all genetic. Society and upbringing and personal experience play a key role in the development of a child's sexuality. Liberals have won this part of the gay debate, eventhough it is not true.

[garylmoore]

We will all have to resort to home schooling, which is what any decent person wanting to protect their children from all this exposure to perversion, should be thinking right now.

[longtermmemmory]

bump

[DoughtyOne]

This article only touches on a part of the problems our kids will face. I don't think we have any concept of what we are about to see folks. Laugh it off at your family's risk.

While schools and the media sought to destroy whatever moral code this nation had, the fact was that as long as marriage was held to be only between a man and a woman, kids were led to beleive that was the only acceptable 'normal' course of action. Once homosexual union is recognized on an even par with heterosexual marriages, kids will be taught to see very little difference between them.

Once this takes place, the stigma that kept kids from experamenting same sex, will by and large be considered a figment of their partent's outmoded values system. The schools and the media reinforce this constantly.

I submit that people are not just 'born' into same sex lives. I submit that societal norms led boys to shun same-sex adventures because of the stigma such promescuity had associated with it. Without that societal stigma, bi-sexual (read that homosexual) experamentation would mean nothing more to kids than heterosexual experamentation would. We're just kidding ourselves if we think our kids won't be brainwashed into these types of experamentations and relationships. I can even see some of their sex education teachers suggesting, "Without experamentation, how do you know what is right for you?"

It will be open season on these kids as on-campus textbooks, teachers and homosexual clubs propagandize the kids, and implement outreach programs.

In the old days surveys were run that asked kids if they had heterosexual experiences at certain stages of their lives. Now we're going to see a skyrocketing of kids who have engaged in what heretofore would have been considered homosexual relations, by the time they leave highschool, or perhaps even middle school.

We have laughed off the MTV produced sexual and violence laden content for about two decades. Currently there are undertones of homosexual (bi-sexual) adventurism laced throughout the programming. Nothing is portrayed as more sexy these day's than to see two women going at it, on the television or the movies that are directed at our youth.

I would submit that the 1 to 2 percent of the populace that is truly inclined toward homosexuality, will mushroom to something like 10% of our society within ten to twenty years, with as much as 50 to 75% of our youth answering yes to questions of homosexual experamentation by the time they have left high school. It will be sold as 'bi-sexuality, something that is as normal in nature as heterosexuality.'

The time has come when I would not want to try to raise a decent moral child any longer. Parents haven't a snowball's chance in hell of staying the course against the full court press being mounted against them.

Someone higher up this thread said the end is near. If only it were so. I am convinced we are only seeing the beginning of the end. It's going to get very ugly folks.

[joesnuffy]

Twenty five years ago, I was witness to one of these lesbian "family" interactions in a Laundromat in Oshkosh, WI. (besides being home to the EAA and Oshkosh B'Gosh its a liberal state college town)

A young boy about 8yrs or so, his natural mother, and her butch partner were doing the family laundry.

Every time the dyke would tell the boy to do something the kid would promptly ignoring or defy her/him/it

I could not help but cheer (at least inwardly) for the young rebel...

Mom kept trying to tell her son that he must do what 'his dad' told him to...which just set the kid off even more in his defiance..

Finally they took him out to their van and he was forced to stay there while they finished their laundry...

I couldn't help but wonder what became of that boy....he would be in his 30s now....Imagine a society where we had majority population of adults raised as he was....(shouldn't be too difficult ..as we are nearly there)

If this boy continued on his path of righteous rebellion against an 'absurd' father figure...it's likely he would be the consummate rebel by the time he reached adulthood... If he reacted to all authority (as he did the dyke's), without a intervention miracle...he most likely ended up a career criminal..living in perpetual conflict with the law...and a problem for any community he settled in.

The child of that lesbian couple was doomed to fail....thanks to his pseudo family... A human's naturally tendency to rebel is multiplied arithmetically when raised in a climate of little legitimate parental authority let alone an illegitimate one..

imo

[Steel and Fire and Stone]

Obviously, if there is no moral or intellectual difference between marriage and sex between two men, two women, "transgendered" men and women, then what about younger men and older men. And then, when is "young" too young? If it's good for a young man to experiment with another boy, is it not wiser for him to be "mentored" on his journey.

This is not some homophobic rant. The fact is, the impetus in a relationship between a man and a woman has not, believe it or not, been a sexual destination. Not that sex was "bad", but that it was in fact both good and necessary for procreation (yes, that awful word).

I have some personal experience with gay men and women. The ultimate destination for most is not marriage, a family, and "home and hearth". It is personal fulfillment realized in sex, lots and lots of it for men, and intimacy for women, much more of it than in heterosexual relationships.

Who is the ideal mate for most normal, well adjusted heterosexual men and woman? A verile person of child bearing age (woman), and a good provider (man). Sex is an "added benefit", but not the ultimate destination. Children, home, and family are the ultimate destination.

Who is the idealized mate for a gay person. If he's a man, he wants a "boy", young, smooth, "cut", just like your average pre-pubescent teenager. All that stuff about gays being no more inclined towards young boys is absolute hogwash. Just look at the literature, and you'll understand their cultural norm. Lesbian women, to a lessor extent idealize a younger, but developed woman, about a 16-22 years old. Yes, there are more masculine "Daddy's" or Dykes, or others trend towards being "fems", but again, no gay guy is lusting after a 35 year old "boy".

The utimate destination for this gay culture trip that Liberal American is taking us on is redefinition of the concept of "child molestation". The true child molester in the brave new world of leftist American will be you and I, if we are parents, who have the audacity to raise children with "closed" minds, who object to our children "experimenting" with "mentors".

In the same manner than many in America now consider an 18 year old virgin to be a sad anacronysm, a poor child suffering from a backwards upbringing, in 5-10 years, they will see any 13 year old child who has not experience some sort of gay intimacy in the same manner. It simply has to be, if you follow the left's logical reasoning.

• Pedophilla? No, it's mentorship.

• Twisted, sick, and perverted? No, it's happy. It's "gay"!

• Conservative, sober, responsible, chaste, heterosexual and monogamous?? No, not at all. You're twisted, sexist, biased, hateful, spiteful, closed minded, and a very poor candidate for parenthood.

The state will endorse it, in fact, it already has through the Public school curicullum. Better a gay parent than a twisted Christian parent. Just a few more years, now...

SFS

[searchandrecovery]

America Sucks.

[elisabeth]

This will just fall into the pattern that keeps repeating: the left will go too far in imposing its views on others, then the right-thinking families (who don't want to put up with this crap) that make the schools good will all leave, and the schools will then deteriorate. Finally, the leftists will blame the right for the poor condition of the schools.

Same thing with any social problem-- the left blasted the right for condemning and stigmatizing teenage pregnancy, and then turns around and blames the right when it becomes an epidemic and a real social problem.

I don't care what two consenting adults do on their own time. I do care when the public schools become instruments of social indoctrination and social engineering rather than places of learning where kids can learn HOW to think, not WHAT to think.

[Caipirabob]

*ping*

You may feel compelled to wash your hands after reading this...

[AmericanVictory]

Why do we want to promote any kind of extra-marital sexual activity among minors, much less that which to all believers of all major creeds is sinful and harmful? Why do those who promote perversion in the name of "equal rights" not get challenged on their real agenda of taking away the right of all who believe to believe that such behavior is a sin?

[Devil_Anse]

The funny thing is that persons with SSAD are still very dependent on heterosexuals. They can't do without heterosexuals. Everything regarding sex is still defined according to masculine and feminine. While this may annoy the heck out of discontented SSAD's, as long as it takes one sperm and one egg to produce a baby, I don't see there being a departure from the masculine/feminine paradigm.

The persons who have this sad disorder still cannot produce offspring unless they (at least temporarily) deny their alleged "homosexual identity" and engage in some behavior which will cause a sperm and egg to unite. I believe that the desire to produce offspring is pretty strong, generally speaking. After all, that's what populates the world. That's what heterosexuality does for the world. What, I wonder, does homosexuality do for the world?

[Carry_Okie]

I heard a news report this morning that a class of 4th graders in a San Francisco school just sent the mayor thank you notes for instituting gay marriage.

[EdReform]

Ping

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

[lentulusgracchus]

Most of the major players who mold our youth have already endorsed homosexuality and even cross-dressing. The National Education Association, the nation's largest teachers' union, favors support for "gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender" students and teachers, which translates into uncritical acceptance throughout the curriculum at your local school.

Ditto with the American Federation of Teachers, the American School Health Association, and the National Association of School Psychologists. The American Association of School Administrators is firmly on board, and the National School Boards Association featured a glowing article in a recent newsletter about the great benefits of "gay" clubs in schools.

What the hell is the MATTER with these people?!! Have they all lost their minds, or have they all been replaced by homosexual Pod People??

[tuesday afternoon]

Bump.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Unfortunately I am super busy right now and can't read this until later.

Sometimes people don't want to read about or hear the "gory details" of what the homo-activists have planned for us, or what they are doing already. Don't be in the dark. In a war, one of the most important things is to KNOW THE ENEMY.

Be informed and inform others! That's the key to defeating this evil.

Let me know if you want on or off this ping list.

[PJ-Comix]

Just think of any kid PURCHASED by Rosie O'Donnell. Think such a kid has any chance of growing up with a mind not completely screwed up? I call any such kid DOOMED. I love how all these liberal groups have organizations supposedly looking out for the welfare of children and yet they actively support such situations where lesbos like Rosie can just PURCHASE babies. You KNOW those kids will grow up completely disoriented as to almost everything.

[FeliciaCat]

For those who say this will never happen...40 years ago the idea of a "Gay Pride" parade with mostly naked young men grinding each other down a Main Street USA and topless butch lesbians strolling arm and arm, would have gotten you laughed out the room. Now its a reality as anyone who has ever witnessed a Gay Pride Parade. (I have)
Mark my words. If this madness is not curtailed soon, Nambla and the like will start a INTENSE campaign for the hearts and minds of your son & daughter, just as GLAD & GLSEN have. It will all be in the name of "tolerance" and "acceptance of others" and anybody who doesnt get on board will labled racist/hateful/intolerant/a Nazi .....Just watch.