Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Filibuster_60
That's the bad news. The good news is, the carriers are based on the French design.
2 posted on
02/18/2004 1:30:46 PM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: Filibuster_60
![](http://www.thomasecolvin.com/images/45.jpg)
Buncha junk.
3 posted on
02/18/2004 1:32:27 PM PST by
martin_fierro
(I miss the Media Schadenfreude Ping)
To: Filibuster_60
Would not surprise me, they are hot to trot in space, stands to reason they aren't going to ignore the sea.
5 posted on
02/18/2004 1:36:47 PM PST by
af_vet_rr
To: Filibuster_60
Heads up, Jeff Head!
8 posted on
02/18/2004 1:41:03 PM PST by
NorseWood
To: Filibuster_60
Nice of them to build the first significant targets our navy has had since WWII.....
9 posted on
02/18/2004 1:42:12 PM PST by
dixierat
(Just a white boy lookin' for a place to do my thing....(Merle Haggard))
To: Filibuster_60
The Chinese bought the USSR's last and only jet aircraft carrier. It stands to reason they would build more.
To: Filibuster_60
The local fish population will be very happy to hear that they have a couple of new artificial reefs coming their way.
12 posted on
02/18/2004 1:45:33 PM PST by
AngryJawa
(It Is Not One World...)
To: Filibuster_60
The Three A/C names:
1. Mai Ding Dong
2. One Hung Low
3. Yu Fat Too
13 posted on
02/18/2004 1:50:06 PM PST by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: BroncosFan
Chicom Aircraft Carrier Ping.
Do you think they'll be able to make this work? Carrier aviation is tougher than it looks.
15 posted on
02/18/2004 1:50:45 PM PST by
Modernman
("When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." -Otto von Bismarck)
To: Filibuster_60
Wow, a carrier without assigned air assets.
So I guess any carrier-capable fighter or attack jet stick in the PLAN will be expected to just show up full qualified to trap and launch from any of the three carriers. Mix and match. With and without ordnance, day, night, NVG, in all weather conditions (above flight minimums). And they will gain and maintain their at-sea flight quals by ???
This is an extremely dangerous business even with dedicated carrier air groups. Unfortunately, the Chinese may be in for some unpleasant surprises. Wonder how many pilots they will kill, aircraft they will destroy and how much damage they will do to the ships before they realize buying a dedicated air group is actually cheaper. (Nice power protection bonus when they do that too.)
But who knows. With their reliance on the extensive carrier operation experience of the Russians and their own potent submarine operational experience, they could be a serious menace in the western Pacific region. ;-)
17 posted on
02/18/2004 1:56:50 PM PST by
Captain Rhino
(If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: Filibuster_60
This may be what is driving steel prices sky high lately. China is buying up ALL of the us scrap steel available.
To: Filibuster_60
These guys have been working on a navy for a long time
they want to "negate" our naval superiority so that they can grab Taiwan back
26 posted on
02/18/2004 2:14:21 PM PST by
DM1
To: Filibuster_60
48,000 tons is pretty small in today's world. They are between the old WWII Essex Class and the immediate post-WWII Midway Class carriers.
They certainly aren't in any way equivalent to the Enterprise or Nimitz class ships we have.
To: Filibuster_60
Time for Taiwan to speed up the production of those submarines! Perhaps we could loan them a couple, fortraining purposes only , of course! (cough, cough)
To: Filibuster_60
Oh goody goody! Target practice for the U.S Navy!
33 posted on
02/18/2004 2:43:39 PM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(It's not over till the intern sings)
To: Filibuster_60
It's always dangerous to underestimate an opponent. Let's wait until the carriers are underway before photo-shopping Titanic life preservers on 'em.
To: Filibuster_60
Thank you, Bill Clinton, you traitorous c********r! I guess the democrats plan to complete the program of high-tech transfers to China he started as soon as they win the White House again.
Well, we're nuts if we allow China and the democrats to build up the Chinese military until it becomes a modern high-tech nuclear power that can pose an extreme threat to America. We should take them out right now. The Chinese we can deal with later.
To: Filibuster_60
Commie Kerry said he knows, "something about aircraft carriers for real..."
Maybe this is what he was talking about?
39 posted on
02/18/2004 3:36:42 PM PST by
Joe 6-pack
("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
To: Filibuster_60
Gotta start a pool. How many of their own aircraft, crashing during landing attempts, will it take to sink said carrier?
41 posted on
02/18/2004 3:45:05 PM PST by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
To: Filibuster_60
In other news
The NOW gang has decided to field a Professional Football Team. Patricia Ireland was heard to comment "We will be challenging the Patriots for the superbowl next year."
The similarities are staggering
42 posted on
02/18/2004 3:47:54 PM PST by
Leatherneck_MT
(Good night Chesty, wherever you may be.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson