Skip to comments.
Chandler Wins Kentucky House Seat (Get Yer Ear Plugs In Now!)
WKYT News ^
| Feb. 17, 2004
| WKYT
Posted on 02/17/2004 4:18:04 PM PST by GiveEmDubya
WKYT projects Democrat Ben Chandler as the winner of the 6th district congressional district race.
Chandler defeats Republican Alice Forgy-Kerr for the seat. It was a contentious campaign with both sides lobbing negative campaign ads at each other.
>Live Election Results Tally Chandler wins the seat after Republican Ernie Fletcher left the seat empty after winning the Kentucky governor's race last year.
Kentucky's former Attorney General, Chandler lost to Fletcher in that governor's race.
Forgy-Kerr was a bit of an unknown district-wide going into the race. However, a highly funded campaign and some help from the national Republican party quickly gave her name recognition in the region.
We saw higher than normal voter turnout. That generally favors Democrats in this heavily-Democrat registered district. That was borne out this election day.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 2004; aliceforgykerr; benchandler; democrats; electionushouse; liberalweenies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Let the Terry McAuliffe verbal orgasms begin.
To: GiveEmDubya
2
posted on
02/17/2004 4:23:06 PM PST
by
Corin Stormhands
(Will FReep for tag line...)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: GiveEmDubya
We saw higher than normal voter turnout. That blows. If the 'RATS keep this up it's going to be a very long night in November come the election.
To: HostileTerritory
I don't remember who said it, but the other day, someone on TV said that this could be one of those seats that the Democrats get their euphoric high off of now--only to lose it again in November. Let's hope we're in a better position to win here then than now.
It doesn't particularly matter in Kentucky, Kerry will lose every single southern state and just about every state that has a close connection to the South.
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: William Creel
That's all well and good, but he and a good number of GOP bigwigs should have promised to prevent Chandler from WINNING.
To: GiveEmDubya
Who used to hold this seat?
9
posted on
02/17/2004 4:30:15 PM PST
by
Physicist
(Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
To: William Creel
I guess so--as long as the good feelings go away by November!
To: Physicist
The current Kentucky governor, Ernie Fletcher (R). Before him, it was Scottie Baesler (D).
To: Pubbie; Torie; ambrose; JohnnyZ
FEBRUARY 17, 19:29 ET
U.S. House i = incumbent = winner
U.S. House
U.S. House - District 6 - 575 of 594 precincts reporting
Name Party Votes Pct
A.B. Ben Chandler III Dem 81,549 55.1%
Alice Forgy Kerr GOP 63,545 42.9%
Mark Gailey Lib 2,880 1.9%
12
posted on
02/17/2004 4:32:19 PM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
To: GiveEmDubya
This is not a huge surprise. Chandler ran as a fiscal conservative which is the issue that won most of the votes. Kerr stressed strong party ties.
To: KQQL
I wouldn't worry too much about this loss. It's always disappointing, but the 'Rats got lucky with a candidate with broad name recognition who was well-versed in running as a conservative (he's a liberal, of course, but 'Rats run as conservatives in most races in the south and heartland states). The congressman from this district for years was Scotty Baesler, who was the prototypical "vote liberal in Washington, talk conservative back home" type political hack.
I hate losing the seat, especially since the margin of victory for Chandler was almost certainly conservative voters who were fooled by him. Hopefully it will show the GOP that they need to recruit stronger candidates and put more of an effort into local elections.
14
posted on
02/17/2004 4:39:26 PM PST
by
puroresu
To: KQQL
About 160K voted there in 2002.
It actually looks like LESS people voted tonight than in an off-year, which is to be expected in a special election, but the turnout was not absolutely colossal compared to how many will vote in November.
In 2000 (Presidential year), turnout was a little less than double the vote count tonight.
Regardless, on a Presidential election night, there will be a lot more votes than this.
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: VeritatisSplendor; GraniteStateConservative; Republican Wildcat
17
posted on
02/17/2004 4:47:56 PM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
To: William Creel
Before we know it, Bush will be campaigning and all of John Kerry's irresistable charm won't be able to save him...(/rolls eyes)
If Bush's coattails are long enough this November in Kentucky, Chandler shouldn't get too comfortable in his new office.
Ben the RAT wins !!!
In the nation's first federal election of 2004, Chandler became the first Democrat since 1991 to win a Republican-held seat in a special election. The win leaves Republicans with a 228-205 majority in the House, with one vacancy and one independent.
http://www.wlextv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1649807&nav=EQloKtF2
19
posted on
02/17/2004 4:50:18 PM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
To: GiveEmDubya
KERR was not the right perosn to run in this district..
THIS IS A WIN FOR THE RATS AGAINST MCCONNELL KY MACHINE>>>>
20
posted on
02/17/2004 4:52:11 PM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson