Skip to comments.
EXIT POLL SNEAK: KERRY, EDWARDS BATTLE FOR WISCONSIN - LIVE ( 38% Kerry, 38% Edwards)
DRUDGE ^
| 2/17/04
Posted on 02/17/2004 12:46:24 PM PST by areafiftyone
LATE AFTERNOON EXIT POLLS SHOW JOHN EDWARDS PULLING A STRONG SHOWING AGAINST JOHN KERRY, TOP MEDIA AND CAMPAIGN SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... KERRY 42%, EDWARDS 31%, DEAN 15%... DEVELOPING...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; dean; edwards; edwardswatch; election2004; kerry; ketchup; lurch; primary; wi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,181-1,189 next last
To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
Well, I did my best to prop Dean up there. Still, voting dem made me feel icky.
I voted Dean, too, and I know exactly what you mean. When I got back to the car my first thought was: ''I need a shower!''
21
posted on
02/17/2004 12:59:38 PM PST
by
elli1
To: areafiftyone
I had hope that the Midwest voter would see though Kerry.
22
posted on
02/17/2004 1:00:23 PM PST
by
sarasota
To: areafiftyone
I remember the NH exit polls had it very close and the final results were Kerry by double digits instead.
It will be interesting if Edwards does indeed finish a strong second.
To: elli1
Why Dean instead of Edwards? Just curious.
24
posted on
02/17/2004 1:01:29 PM PST
by
sarasota
To: familyofman
The doctored photo is the B & W one w/ Hanoi Jane standing behind a mic & Kerry is seated on the same stage.
25
posted on
02/17/2004 1:02:30 PM PST
by
elli1
To: areafiftyone
Just keep in mind that if we conservatives keep knocking down all of the vulnerable Democrat candidates before the convention, than all that will be left are the nearly invulnerable candidates. I'd rather have Bush taking on idiots like Dean or Kerry because they are so easy to knock down. Edwards might be a tougher nut to crack.
26
posted on
02/17/2004 1:03:08 PM PST
by
Spiff
(Don't believe everything you think.)
To: mewzilla
Re#18 Heard Rush talking about it, don't know if I've seen both here, though. Maybe Rush's site has some info. I'll keep an eye out here and ping you if I see it here....
27
posted on
02/17/2004 1:04:22 PM PST
by
eureka!
(How the lamestream presstitutes can sleep at night is beyond me.....)
To: areafiftyone
This may seal the deal on a Kerry/Edwards ticket.
To: McGruff
29
posted on
02/17/2004 1:07:27 PM PST
by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
To: sarasota
If the exit poll is correct, the 42% for Kerry is not especially compelling -- justification for both Edwards and Dean to not quit. Let's keep it rolling, it bankrupts Kerry a little more each day for spring and summer.
30
posted on
02/17/2004 1:08:07 PM PST
by
mwl1
To: elli1
"The doctored photo is the B & W one w/ Hanoi Jane standing behind a mic & Kerry is seated on the same stage."
Thanks - I knew there was at least 2; 1 real & 1 memorex.
To: Republican Red
What a great post!
To: areafiftyone
Do tell. That may mean Clinton and Edwards. Two lawyers.
To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
>>Well, I did my best to prop Dean up there. Still, voting dem made me feel icky.<<
I did my part for Dean, too, but I had to take a shower when I got home from the polls. Gotta say I feel bad for Dean seeing the hack job his own party did on him. Looks like it might be Kerry's turn now.
To: freekitty
Waiting for more info. But of course Drudge likes to keep everyone in suspense.
35
posted on
02/17/2004 1:09:50 PM PST
by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: mwl1
Translation it is not over....
36
posted on
02/17/2004 1:10:14 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: familyofman
37
posted on
02/17/2004 1:10:48 PM PST
by
McGruff
To: sarasota
Why Dean instead of Edwards? Just curious.
Never considered either Edwards or Clark. Was looking for the candidate that would give the Dem establishment the most grief. Had planned to vote for Sharpie until Dean hit the wall. Frankly, I'm really, really surprised that Edwards is pulling this kind of support in Wisconsin. There's a strong anti-Southern bias here.
38
posted on
02/17/2004 1:10:51 PM PST
by
elli1
To: eureka!
Thanks. I checked there a while ago, but nothing was up yet. Limbaugh said he'd link a .pdf I think.
Anyway, IMHO, this is a freaking big deal. Not just what it reveals about the press' willingness to cover for Ketchup Boy (the article said that if Kerry lied it was no big deal, and that lying to Imus wasn't a crime), but the BBC did NOT change the time stamp or mention that the article had been edited. Now I'm not a presstitute, but journalistically speaking, ain't that a whopping big NO-NO?
39
posted on
02/17/2004 1:10:56 PM PST
by
mewzilla
To: areafiftyone
I can't help it, but I do, too.
I think it was more the DNC prodding the media to ridicule him. You never recover from ridicule.
They even spared Sharpton and Kucinich that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,181-1,189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson