Anyway, IMHO, this is a freaking big deal. Not just what it reveals about the press' willingness to cover for Ketchup Boy (the article said that if Kerry lied it was no big deal, and that lying to Imus wasn't a crime), but the BBC did NOT change the time stamp or mention that the article had been edited. Now I'm not a presstitute, but journalistically speaking, ain't that a whopping big NO-NO?