Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry to Keep Senate Seat During Campaign
AP ^ | 2.17.04

Posted on 02/17/2004 12:00:04 AM PST by ambrose

Kerry to Keep Senate Seat During Campaign Kerry Campaign Says He'll Keep Senate Seat While Seeking Presidential Nomination

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Feb. 17 - Sen. John Kerry doesn't plan to resign his Senate seat while he pursues the Democratic presidential nomination.

Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said Kerry, who has won 14 of the 16 Democratic primaries and caucuses to date, "will continue to fight for the issues important to the people of Massachusetts and all Americans" as he makes his bid for the White House.

Darrell West, a Brown University political science professor, said it would make sense for Kerry, who is serving his fourth term in the Senate, to resign.

"He doesn't need the money or the aggravation, and he's going to be spending most of his time campaigning," West said. "It would help for him to not have to vote."

At the same time, West said, Kerry could lose everything if he resigned his seat and then didn't win the White House.

The key concern for Kerry and the Democrats is that if he resigns or even if he does not and goes on to win the White House Massachusetts Republican Gov. Mitt Romney would appoint an interim replacement.

Assuming he appointed a Republican, it would break the Democrats' 26-year grip on the state's two Senate seats. The last Republican senator from Massachusetts was Edward Brooke, who won election in 1966 and served two terms.

Members of the state's congressional delegation were emphatically opposed to any notion of resignation.

"It would be dangerous to give the right wing controlling the United States Senate an extra vote," said Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass. "There are many Senate votes that are very close."

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said there is no more reason for Kerry to step down to run his campaign full time than there is for President Bush to resign to campaign.

Republicans were cautious, saying they were not ready to call for Kerry to step down.

But Dominic Ianno, executive director of the Massachusetts Republican party, found the idea of Kerry stepping down enticing.

"We'd have a Republican senator," Ianno said.

Romney spokeswoman Shawn Feddeman said the governor hadn't given the matter any thought.

"Our money's on Bush," she said.

In 1996, Sen. Bob Dole gave up his seat in early June before formally receiving the GOP nod to run against President Clinton.

Dole said he wanted to focus on an all-or-nothing election race and "leave behind all the trappings of power, all comfort and all security."

But four years later, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut ran for re-election to his Senate seat while simultaneously running as the Democratic vice presidential candidate. That decision worried some state Democrats because if Lieberman had resigned, a Democrat could have run. But if he stayed and became vice president, Republican Gov. John Rowland would have appointed a GOP replacement.

Lieberman's safety net worked for him. He lost the White House race, but kept his Senate seat.

Under Massachusetts law and the constitution, if a vacancy occurs Romney would appoint an interim senator, who would serve until the next state election in 2006. There would then be an election to fill the final two years of Kerry's term, which ends in 2008. And in 2008 there would be an election for a full six-year term.

There is no mechanism to call for a special election.

While Democrats and Republicans insist there is little speculation so far on who would be the top contenders if a vacancy came up, a few names have surfaced.

On the Republican side, Romney cannot appoint himself, but he could resign and be appointed by the lieutenant governor.

Among Democrats, several House members would be near the top of any list, including Markey and Meehan, along with Reps. Barney Frank and William Delahunt.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2004; alexgate; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 02/17/2004 12:00:04 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Wow, Mr. Kerry sure is confident of his chances, isn't he?

< / sarcasm>
2 posted on 02/17/2004 12:01:52 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to call a Vietnam War Navy vet a coward...
3 posted on 02/17/2004 12:04:37 AM PST by RichInOC (buuuuuuuuucbucbucbucbucbucbuc...what? I didn't say anything about calling him chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
Go for it... because he is a coward.
4 posted on 02/17/2004 12:06:55 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Every time he is absent for a vote is a good day for America.
5 posted on 02/17/2004 12:11:44 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said there is no more reason for Kerry to step down to run his campaign full time than there is for President Bush to resign to campaign.

Well, President Bush isn't missing any votes and thus isn't, er, AWOL, buddy.

6 posted on 02/17/2004 12:16:01 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
The funny thing is I believe that if Kerry resigned NOW, there'd be a special election this November. If he's elected Prez and resigns, the GOP keeps the seat until 2006.

Tells you how confident he is of his chances.
7 posted on 02/17/2004 12:18:07 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
That's what I was thinking !!!
8 posted on 02/17/2004 12:24:36 AM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Kerry

I thank you for your service,
Way back in Viet Nam.
But that is no free ticket,
To let you pull this scam.
You spit upon our nation,
Betrayed our young brave men.
You called them baby killers,
It’s not true now, nor then.
You sir are just low life scum,
You prey upon rich chicks.
I hope Teresa sees the light,
And dumps your bag of tricks.
I’ll vote for Bush this coming fall,
And pray that you don’t win.
For if you win, we all will lose,
Our freedom will cave in.

Conspiracy Guy 2/16/4

9 posted on 02/17/2004 4:52:05 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Ronald Reagan is the most influential public figure in my life. George W. Bush, take notes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said Kerry, who has won 14 of the 16 Democratic primaries and caucuses to date, "will continue to fight for the issues important to the people of Massachusetts and all Americans" as he makes his bid for the White House.

+++++

Why do the anti-war dems always promise to "fight" for their constituents?

This 'core belief' statement of the dems has always jarred my ears.
10 posted on 02/17/2004 6:04:35 AM PST by maica (World Peace starts with W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I wonder if any Republicans at all held on to their current political office while running for another office, like lieberman and kerry, etc. Or is this just another way demodimwits milk everything they can out of their chosen profession? I think this should be a campaign issue if mostly the weasly, COWARDLY dems do it.
11 posted on 02/17/2004 6:56:48 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Benson? Didn't work. Lieberman? Didn't work. Kerry? Ain't gona work.
12 posted on 02/17/2004 6:56:54 AM PST by Phlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
I wonder if any Republicans at all held on to their current political office while running for another office, like lieberman and kerry, etc.

When did President Bush step down as governor of Texas?

13 posted on 02/17/2004 7:00:55 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I'm delighted. Kerry has a disdain for Governors, so he will probably pick a Senator as his running mate. That means the Democrats will be down two in every Senate vote.

Frist should, and I'm not sure if he has the guts, order every Republican that there will be no pairing. If the Democrats want to deplete their caucus by two, then more power to them.
14 posted on 02/17/2004 8:48:41 AM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maica
and all Americans"

Will he fight for lower taxes smaller government and a strong military. That is what a lot of Americans want. Will he fight for that. I doubt it.

15 posted on 02/17/2004 9:00:44 AM PST by JackDanielsOldNo7 (On guard until the seal is broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
JFKerry AWOL in the Senate.

Of course no big deal considering the nonexistent GOP leadership there.
16 posted on 02/17/2004 9:03:00 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
No, no, no... everyone is missing the key aspect of this.

We don't want Kerry to be absent for votes after Labor Day... as the majority party we control the legislative calendar in the Senate.

We want him throughout the year, especially after Labor Day, to have to vote on: making the tax cuts permanent; the defense appropriation bill; the constitutional amendment to prohibit gay marriage; circuit court judges; and many, many other items.

Every time Kerry has to vote, he alienates either his base or the broad section of the American electorate. If he is absent, we call him AWOL.
17 posted on 02/17/2004 9:10:34 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
The fact that the RATS are nominating a Senator from the minority party shows their desperation -- using Senate legislative procedure we can destroy his candidacy in September and deliberately keep him off the campaign trail.
18 posted on 02/17/2004 9:12:04 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
Yes, you make a good point. I'm wrong, and you are right. We could use our position to great effect. Just imagine how quickly the moderate voters will run from Kerry if he does vote in the Senate. Just imagine how quickly the liberal voters will run to Nade if he doesn't vote in the Senate.

I CAN'T WAIT! (Let's just hope Frist does what Rove tells him to do)
19 posted on 02/17/2004 9:13:15 AM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Frist will do exactly what the White House tells him to do. We will use the Senate rules to destroy John Kerry.
20 posted on 02/17/2004 9:13:21 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson