Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why young women are exposing themselves: Part one
townhall.com ^ | 2/17/04 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 02/16/2004 10:17:33 PM PST by kattracks

You may have noticed that many young women wear less, and more sexually provocative, clothing in public than they did a generation, or even 10 years, ago.

It is easier to notice, however, than to explain.

But explaining it is crucial to understanding what has happened to men and women in the last 40 years and where male-female relations are headed. Women exposing their bodies in public is a big deal. Playing with the sex drive, the most powerful force in nature, is far more dangerous than playing with fire. Even if one welcomes this development -- and for the record, as a male I am turned on, while as a man I am turned off -- it begs for explanation.

I will offer at least five reasons that may be less obvious but more important than the valid ones usually given -- peer pressure, women buy what stores sell and the sexual revolution.

The first is "equality."

By equality, I do not mean the belief that men and women are equal human beings, a belief that all decent people hold. Rather, I mean the feminist and politically correct definition of equality: sameness. Men and women have come to be regarded as the same, not simply as equals.

Thanks to feminist doctrines that pervade education from kindergarten through graduate school, men and women increasingly believe that the sexes are largely identical. Therefore, the arenas wherein women can feel and demonstrate their feminine distinctiveness have narrowed appreciably.

By showing more of their bodies, women can announce that they are women. There are other ways young women can publicly demonstrate their distinct female identity -- for example, by wearing feminine clothing and other feminine behavior, being a wife, being pregnant and being a mother.

But those ways are increasingly ignored, deferred and discredited. Among egalitarians, being a wife is no different a role than that of husband, and motherhood is no longer regarded as distinctively female. Husbands and fathers are supposed to play identical roles, and because of the movement for gay equality, mothers have been declared unnecessary -- two fathers, most well educated people now contend, are every bit as good for a child as a mother and a father.

So, for the young woman for whom marriage, pregnancy and motherhood are remote or even undesirable given the anti-traditional education she has received, her primary vehicle of proclaiming she is a woman is literally to expose the fact.

A second, related, reason is the death of femininity.

In the past, expressing one's femaleness was done through expressing femininity. In addition to the female roles of wife and mother, there were numerous ways of doing so. One was, of course, dress. But in the name of equality and comfort, distinctive female dress -- such as dresses and skirts -- has been largely abandoned. A young woman who wore a dress or even a skirt and blouse to a college, let alone high school, class would probably be considered stranger by her peers than one who wore a see-through top.

Today, instead of women wearing feminine clothing, they either wear essentially male clothing (such as pants and pants suits) or flesh-baring sexually provocative clothing. Feminine attire -- i.e., clothing that is very female but not very revealing -- is rare.

Femininity was also expressed by sexual reticence. Again, such a notion is laughable in much of contemporary society. The idea that a man made great efforts to be allowed sexual contact with a woman rendered women feminine in men's eyes. They are different from us -- they are feminine. Women who act as sexually available as a man -- through their behavior or their dress -- are not perceived as feminine, since they are perceived as being male-like.

Likewise, the myriad ways in which men treated women as women -- such as opening doors for them -- all declared that women were feminine, i.e., different from masculine. That is why many feminists opposed men opening doors for women -- it reinforced notions of femininity, a value that feminism has sought to extinguish.

So, femininity is largely a dead concept. Ask most young women -- or men -- what it means, and you will get either a blank stare or a hostile reaction.

Thus, many women are now saying: "I am a woman. And I will declare it in one of the only ways left to me -- I will show you my female body."

©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: britnewear; dennisprager; dress; feminazis; feminist; modesty; veil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: BenLurkin
Well, I saw two reasons....
21 posted on 02/16/2004 11:02:42 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user
19- Sorry, I don't understand your comment - "The kicker is that the hookers don't have their parents buying them nice "school clothes" like the high schoolers."

What I thought were hookers were just high school girls waiting for the school bus.

But they were dressed like many of the hookers I have seen in large cities around the world.

How in the world were they allowed out of the house, onto the school bus, and into the school?
22 posted on 02/16/2004 11:05:16 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
I saw an episode of Cops in New Orleans during Mardi Gras.

Public nudity is prohibited by law. The cops use discretion and tend cite the more obvious cases. They don't permit people to drop their pants. They also would stop the women who walked down the street without a shirt or bra; while it is true "what was she wearing" is not a defense against sexual assault, it still presents an open invitation when showing your primary sex traits bare in a crowd of drunken strangers.

23 posted on 02/16/2004 11:05:49 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
Some parents want to be "friends" to their kids instead of parents. They want to be perceived as "cool".
24 posted on 02/16/2004 11:07:00 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterInTexas
My first recognition of what the "feminist revolution" meant came in the late eighties.

I was dining alone at a buffet restaurant in Panama City Beach, FL. It was Spring break. A mixed group of twenty-or-so students arrived who, by their attire, attended Wisconsin/Platteville.

Slowly, I became aware they were behaving in a manner with which I was unfamiliar. I couldn't place it at first...and, then, it hit me.

The boys were not deferring to the girls. There was no pretense about letting the females be seated or go thru the buffet line first -- it was catch, as catch can.

I became intrigued with what I was seeing, so I paid a bit more attention -- noticing things I hadn't noticed before.

The boys didn't help the girls with their chairs, when they were seated or when they went back for dessert. When the boys went to get seconds or another glass of tea, nobody offered to take the girl's plates or glasses and refill them. The girls were on their own.

The boys were eating like a bunch of guys at a hunting camp, exhibiting no table manners at all. For the most part, they were totally ignoring the girls' presence.

In fact, the boys were acting like slobs. And, to my surprise, so were the girls! They were acting like guys. Sloppy clothing, no display of table manners, no sign of courtesy to the person next to or across from them.

And, then, I noticed something else. Even though it was a group of twenty, all apparently from the same school, they acted as if they were alone. Even lonely. Within the new conventions (or the absence of the old ones), they didn't seem to know how to socially interact.

The girls didn't sit in a group, they were distributed among the boys -- but it obviously wasn't a boyfriend/girlfriend matchup. It was random. The communication seemed stifled -- among everyone. A few end-to-end shouts between the boys...and there was some talking. But there were no conversations, if you know what I mean. Nobody seemed to be paying the slightest bit of attention to anybody but themselves.

Spring break. Out to have a good time. Seafood restaurant on the beach. In an identity group, but somehow isolated and all alone. And, while mildly unhappy about it, seemingly confused as to how to spark a human response.

"I have seen the future", I thought to myself, "and I don't like it one bit."

The vivid image of that evening has stayed with me for about 15 years now.

25 posted on 02/16/2004 11:10:47 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Sad isn't it? Welcome to the look of the high school girls of today...
26 posted on 02/16/2004 11:11:39 PM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterInTexas
...but as a woman, myself, I believe the greater contributing factors to the degeneration of my sex is the push for sex as a replacement for love (breaking down the honor of family for the false promise of flings) and the erosion of the feminine mystique - that is, the belief that you are special and unique and worth the effort. Nowadays, young women have no mystique left - those who hold themselves back from decadence are criticized, not praised, and are labeled "unliberated" or "oppressed."

Well said. I wish all young girls could learn this.

27 posted on 02/16/2004 11:14:22 PM PST by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Some young women dress like tarts in college. Most dress on the masculine side, as the article suggests. One young woman always came to class (local college, last year) dressed well, always feminine in appearance and behavior, with beautiful hair. The young men were transfixed by her. The tarts were never show-stoppers. The feminine woman was.

My wife and I visited a liberal college. The women all looked tired, haggard, bitter. Then we visited Wheaton College. The women looked happy, attractive, cheerful. The contrast was very apparent. The modernists have sold this generation of women a bill of goods.
28 posted on 02/16/2004 11:17:16 PM PST by sine_nomine (Protect the weakest of the weak - the unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: XBob
It's late. :) What I meant to say is that hookers are probably more modestly dressed than the high schoolers you saw waiting for the bus.

This is because hookers can't afford (e.g. don't have mom and dad to buy them) the latest trashy fashions. Hookers probably smoke less too.
29 posted on 02/16/2004 11:18:30 PM PST by anonymous_user (Politics is show business for ugly people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: weegee
That says a mouth full. I refuse to buy my girls revealing clothes. Our school district also has dress codes such as, no tank tops, no bellies showing and shorts must be at least long enough so finger tips are even with the bottom when arms are hanging straight at the side. Sometimes I can't believe what some of my daughters friends wear. My girls wouldn't be allowed to own them much less wear them in public.
30 posted on 02/16/2004 11:42:33 PM PST by codyjacksmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm not sure girls are exposing more now than they did in the late sixties and early seventies they are just doing it in different ways. Those mini-skirts they had back then showed a lot of leg.

My theory is that women dress to attract a certain level of attention. During wartime, when there is a shortage of young men, women notice that they aren't getting enough attention and so they dress more provocatively to compensate.
31 posted on 02/16/2004 11:49:24 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
Some of it may be due to parents simply not caring what their daughters wear. I know that had I tried to dress in the more popular styles when I was in high school, my mom or dad would have dragged me back in the house and made me change. I wasn't one of the "cool kids" - who were incidentally the ones drinking, smoking, having sex, etc - but as a young adult I now appreciate that my mother took the effort to get me to dress nicely.

It's hard, even as an adult woman, to find nice, younger-looking clothes that are feminine yet modest. I obviously don't want to appear frumpy. It is very worth it, though - my clothing is modest enough that my male co-workers are comfortable looking at me (other young women at work like to show off a lot more!), yet I certainly don't "blend in" with the men.

I feel quite feminine by wearing nice clothes that cover me up - I don't need to wear a long frilly flowered dress to feel feminine.
32 posted on 02/17/2004 4:07:41 AM PST by Rubber_Duckie_27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It's just a shame that it seems like the only women who enjoy showing their stuff are the ones who look like burly male truck drivers.
33 posted on 02/17/2004 4:32:26 AM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Sorry, I don't understand your comment

It was pretty clear wasn't it? Not only do they dress like whores, their parents are the ones buying them the clothes.

34 posted on 02/17/2004 4:57:58 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The boys didn't help the girls with their chairs,

These must've been pretty heavy chairs. Do girls really need help with them?

35 posted on 02/17/2004 5:00:08 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bttt
36 posted on 02/17/2004 5:16:20 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XBob
I was astonished, they were high school girls on their way to school, dressed like hookers.

I drive past a local high school every evening on the way home and see many of the late leavers on their way home. It is disgusting to say the least. I see girls looking and acting like cheap whores and boys (yes BOYS - not young men yet) who act like pimps. I then start thanking God for directing us to home school our kids. Yes, they are exposed to it when shopping, but they know exactly what our standards are and do not cross the line.

37 posted on 02/17/2004 5:42:58 AM PST by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Guys wearing kilts don't expose as much flesh as the Britney Spear Gals. Unless of course, they're mooning their enemies a la Braveheart.
38 posted on 02/17/2004 5:44:40 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I wonder if there is a difference between girls who know their fathers and feel loved by them and the girls being raised by single mothers who are themselves always on the make. It seems to me there might be, in this area there is a very high teen pregnancy rate and many of the girls have no fathers themselves, they are just doing what they see done at home.
39 posted on 02/17/2004 5:45:39 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: XBob
I am considering putting that post in the Hall of Fame.
40 posted on 02/17/2004 5:49:01 AM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson