Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Well Did He Serve?
Time Magazine On Line ^ | February 15,2004 | Michael Duffy

Posted on 02/15/2004 5:42:33 AM PST by John W

Bush said he reported for duty in Alabama, but even with the new documents, the evidence is thin. TIME looks at four key questions

George W. Bush has long had a habit of giving people nicknames—and perhaps that's because he picked up a few along the way himself. Like the one he earned in 1972, when he left his home in Houston to work on the long-shot Senate campaign of Winton M. (Red) Blount in Alabama. Bush, then 26, would often turn up at campaign headquarters in Montgomery around lunchtime, recount his late-night exploits and brag about his political connections, according to a Blount campaign worker. All that made him slow to win over the Alabama crowd, who began to complain that Bush was letting things slide. C. Murphy Archibald, a nephew of Blount's who worked on the campaign that fall, told TIME that Bush "was good at schmoozing the county chairs, but there wasn't a lot of follow-up." Archibald, now a trial attorney in North Carolina, remembers that a group of older Alabama socialites, who were volunteering their time, gave Bush a nickname because they thought he "looked good on the outside but was full of hot air." They called him the Texas Soufflé.

Skimming the surface and skipping over details may be business as usual for a happy-go-lucky 26-year-old, but it's a problem for a President during a winter of discontent. Whether Bush performed his National Guard duties while he was working on the Blount campaign—as well as during much of the year starting in May 1972—was raised in his past campaigns and always fluttered away quickly, an issue regarded as irrelevant after two decades or more. But it has become germane this time in a way it never was before because for the second time in as many months—first on prewar intelligence in Iraq and now on his military record—Bush is caught in a gap between what he has claimed and what he can prove. At the same time, he's gearing up for a fight with a probable Democratic nominee whose record as a Vietnam War hero helps buy him credibility to challenge Bush on his military resume. Bush insists he did his duty in Alabama, but the records—and many memories—don't confirm it. And these days, people are paying a lot closer attention to the President's words.

All week long, the White House tried to complete two contradictory missions: keep Bush's promise to Tim Russert on NBC's Meet the Press to release all his military records—and change the story line as quickly as possible. First came the Bush pay stubs, which showed he was paid for some work during his Alabama sojourn but didn't prove he did any work. Then came a page of a dental exam, proving that he had at least turned up at an air base to have his teeth checked. And finally, when those documents weren't having the proper impact, the White House released 400 pages of military records on a late Friday afternoon. Those documents didn't solve the puzzle either, but by then the White House hoped that at least no one could accuse the President of hiding anything. "We're going on the offensive on this," says a top official. "The problem with the Democrats is that they always overplay their hand."

It may be that Bush's military service has already passed into the custody of amateur oral historians—those who say he never turned up, and the lone veteran and the ex-girlfriend who say Bush reported for duty in Alabama. But if the stack of papers may someday intrigue his biographers—we learn that Bush had an appendectomy at age 10, that he took a semester of Japanese during his senior year at Yale, that his Air Force minders rated him "a natural leader whom his contemporaries look to"—they also leave many of the central mysteries of his service unsolved. Here are four:

How Did Bush Get In the Guard, And What Were His Duties?

It was Bush's name that helped land him the coveted Guard-duty spot in the first place. Maurice Udell, the flight instructor who trained Bush, told TIME last week that "there was all kinds of people trying to get in, lot of 'em flying Cessnas. But Bush's stock went way up when I found out his dad was the youngest [Navy] pilot in World War II and got shot down. As far as I was concerned, who were they? When your dad flies in the war in combat, that gives you a leg up." It also probably didn't hurt that Bush's father was a Congressman from Houston.

After basic training and flight school, Bush spent most of his time in the service with the 111th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron at Ellington Field, a "champagne" unit based southeast of Houston. Suiting up for battle alongside scions of other Texas political families—Connally and Bentsen—Bush flew the F-102 Delta Dagger, a 1950s-era interceptor, at a speed of 600 m.p.h. over the Gulf Coast on the lookout for enemy aircraft. Duty at Ellington was relatively worry free; the Guard's air-defense mission was certainly a low priority in the 1970s. And the pilots had little fear of being called to active duty in Vietnam; they were flying nearly obsolete F-102s that were not suited to a guerrilla war. But the scene had a touch of glamour for a young man about town. The apron was often jammed with the sleek little jet planes of NASA astronauts who trained nearby and shuttled back and forth from Cape Canaveral, Fla. The 111th had its dangers: Bush and his wingmen often flew in formation, hovering just a few feet from one another's wing tips. At other times, they would wait in a ready room for hours, doing next to nothing on action-free alert drills.

What Did Bush Have to Do to Fulfill His Guard Commitment?

Requirements for service have tightened in the past 20 years, but in those days, the Air Guard made it hard to fail. In Bush's era, a Guardsman was supposed to earn 50 points each year to meet his commitment and avoid, at least in theory, the risk of facing induction into the active-duty force. Getting to 50 was relatively easy if you just showed up. And if you missed your drills, you were allowed to make up points in other ways.

But the Texas Air Guard seemed to make it even easier. For example, several members of the Dallas Cowboys belonged to another unit of the Texas Guard, and each was cut plenty of slack every fall during football season. Henry Simon, a Fort Worth, Texas, lawyer who toiled as a clerk in the Texas Guard's Grand Prairie office during the 1960s, said airmen were given lots of chances to perform "equivalent service" to make up for missed drills. "I don't think there was ever an objective standard of what equivalent service was. It might be something like going to the noon meeting of the town council and accepting a proclamation praising the fine work of the Texas Air National Guard," Simon told TIME. "We'd fill out a form detailing what [the person] did, and he'd get credit for the drill."

When Bush decided to go to work for Blount, he was obliged under Guard rules to request an official transfer to a different Guard unit. He applied in May 1972 to a tiny postal unit in Montgomery and was accepted. There is no paper evidence that he ever reported for duty. Two months later, the Air Force overturned that transfer, and so Bush, in September, requested reassignment to the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group at Dannelly Field, about 15 minutes from downtown Montgomery. The unit flew planes but not the kind Bush could fly.

So Did Bush Report for Duty in Alabama or Not?

Depends on whom you believe. During his Meet the Press appearance, Bush twice told Russert that he reported for duty in Alabama. But for most of last week (and for much of the past four years), it has been difficult to find anyone who recalls seeing Bush at Dannelly Field. (At one point in 2000, 10 Vietnam veterans offered a $1,000 reward to anyone who could prove he saw Bush on duty during 1972.) Even Bush had trouble explaining his job at Dannelly, saying he did "administrative work." John B. Calhoun, an Atlanta resident who served for 28 years in the Air Force and the Alabama Guard, told TIME he clearly remembers Bush reporting for duty on weekends starting in the summer of 1972, apparently before Bush officially requested reassignment there. Calhoun explained that Bush signed into his office and mainly read training manuals and safety magazines, signing out at the end of each drilling day. Bush kept a low profile, Calhoun said, and sometimes ate lunch with Calhoun in the snack bar.

But there are some discrepancies in Calhoun's account: he claimed Bush turned up more often than was indicated in Bush's official pay records for the period. And many other veterans of the 187th do not recall seeing Bush on base. Paul Bishop, a retired Air Force colonel who says he never missed a weekend drill in 27 years with the 187th, told TIME the physical layout of the unit's hangar made it "virtually impossible" for Bush to have met with Calhoun and for none of the unit's 800 other reservists to have seen him. "Fighter pilots, and that's what we are," says Bishop, "have situational awareness. They know everything about their environment, whether it's an enemy plane creeping up or a stranger in their hangar."

This much is known: for the first three years while he was in Texas, Bush had no trouble racking up hundreds of points each year, far in excess of what was required. He logged more than 600 hours of flying time and received glowing evaluations from his superiors. But in 1972, when he moved to Alabama, his points plunged. He earned only 41 points but was awarded the standard 15 "gratuitous" points from Texas Air Guard Major Rufus Martin for being a member in good standing—just enough to meet his obligation.

Why Did He Miss The Physical?

No question so unsettles some former Guardsmen as much as this: If Bush did report, as he contends, why did he let his medical certification lapse around the same time—a full two years before his Guard commitment was up? Four years ago, the Bush campaign said Bush didn't undergo the physical because his family doctor was back in Texas. That explanation doesn't wash; only flight surgeons can perform Air Force exams, and there were plenty of those in Alabama.

The official explanation has changed: the White House now says Bush didn't need to take the medical exam because he was no longer flying. But even if Bush wasn't planning a career in aviation, that explanation is difficult for other pilots to accept. Pilots routinely sacrifice everything to keep their "medical cert" current; the military is rife with stories of cheating by pilots to pass their physicals. And the government, which spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to train and keep its pilots flying, has never looked kindly on highly trained personnel, particularly pilots, standing down on their own. "There are certain things I expect from my pilots," said Major General Paul Weaver, who retired as head of the Air National Guard in 2002. "He should have kept current with his physicals." Some Guard veterans have speculated that Bush may have been dodging random drug tests, which were instituted in some military units as early as 1971. But there is no evidence to support that; in fact, the dentist who worked on Bush's teeth and who later became the commander of the base medical unit, told TIME that the Alabama Guard did not conduct random drug tests until the 1980s.

White House officials, surprised by what they call "the hysteria" over Bush's war record, concede that this has not been their finest hour. "We were a little rusty on this," said an adviser. Said another: "[The White House] swung at a pitch in the dirt."

But the White House has been off its game for weeks, and the hardballs just keep coming. Last week, as Wesley Clark endorsed John Kerry for the Democratic nomination, the retired four-star general said that "questioning our leaders, especially in time of war, is one of the highest forms of patriotism." That suggests a brutal campaign to come about the war that is still going on—especially since the two sides haven't stopped arguing about the one that ended more than three decades ago.

— Reported by Frank Sikora/Birmingham, Cathy Booth Thomas/Dallas, Jackson Baker/Memphis, Mike Billips/Montgomery and John F. Dickerson and Mark Thompson/Washington


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; electionpresident; militaryrecord; nationalguard; servicerecord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2004 5:42:33 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John W
What a pathetic pile of drivel.
2 posted on 02/15/2004 5:44:17 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
You forgot "BARF ALERT" in your title.
3 posted on 02/15/2004 5:52:45 AM PST by RockDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockDoc
Sorry.I thought "Time Magazine" would suffice.
4 posted on 02/15/2004 5:54:52 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John W
Some Guard veterans have speculated that Bush may have been dodging random drug tests, which were instituted in some military units as early as 1971. But there is no evidence to support that; in fact, the dentist who worked on Bush's teeth and who later became the commander of the base medical unit, told TIME that the Alabama Guard did not conduct random drug tests until the 1980s.

So why bring it up if it unless to sow seeds of suspicion? What a vile piece of crap this "reporter" is.

5 posted on 02/15/2004 5:55:04 AM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Another hatchet-job from Time. I do not subscribe for this very reason. I used to subscribe before Ted Turner got on the board.....but things have changed in the war between Americans and liberals....not one cent to liberal causes anymore. Talk about a vast left wing conspiracy.
6 posted on 02/15/2004 5:57:19 AM PST by NetValue (They're not Americans, they're democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Sorry.I thought "Time Magazine" would suffice.

You needn't say more.

7 posted on 02/15/2004 6:00:11 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John W
You surely meant to post this on another forum. The extent to which the so-called news media will go to discredit President Bush has become laughable. You guys just keep talking about this until November.

This is the mode of operation for the dims. If you can't find anything creditable, make something up and beat it to death. Only uninformed sheeples will believe this crap.


8 posted on 02/15/2004 6:01:35 AM PST by PROUDAMREP (UNITE FOR BUSH IN '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W; William McKinley; onyx; Texasforever; Tamsey; Miss Marple; gatorbait; MEG33; Iowa Granny
Skimming the surface and skipping over details may be business as usual for a happy-go-lucky 26-year-old, but it's a problem for a President during a winter of discontent. Whether Bush performed his National Guard duties while he was working on the Blount campaign—as well as during much of the year starting in May 1972—was raised in his past campaigns and always fluttered away quickly, an issue regarded as irrelevant after two decades or more. But it has become germane this time in a way it never was before because for the second time in as many months—first on prewar intelligence in Iraq and now on his military record—Bush is caught in a gap between what he has claimed and what he can prove. At the same time, he's gearing up for a fight with a probable Democratic nominee whose record as a Vietnam War hero helps buy him credibility to challenge Bush on his military resume. Bush insists he did his duty in Alabama, but the records—and many memories—don't confirm it. And these days, people are paying a lot closer attention to the President's words.

Sadly, I can't remember which FOX show I was watching last evening, and who was commenting, but when asked about why the increased and repeated attention about the NG records, the commentator emphatically stated the Dem agenda in this is to question, now and forever afterwards, in the 04 campaign, President Bush's "INTEGRITY"...did he lie to us now, as he did then...

So it's not so much an issue of whether he was AWOL, but more of an issue of why he is deceptive.....that's the campaign agenda of the Dems for 04

Bush should beat them all with the bottom of his shoe.

9 posted on 02/15/2004 6:02:15 AM PST by Neets (Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Bush was "nobody" in 1972, and could work with my at my job every single day, and I wouldn't find him remarkable.

Q: Was he the son of someone famous? No.
A: GHWB(his dad) was then just a lowly congressman in a Texas legislature.

10 posted on 02/15/2004 6:04:28 AM PST by ChadGore (Viva Bush. He's EARNED a second term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROUDAMREP
No,actually I meant to post it here.Many folks post articles and information from "the other side".It helps to see what you're up against.
11 posted on 02/15/2004 6:07:09 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John W
Iam sick to death of this drivel. I pray that karma wheel smacks all these pathetic buttwipes right upside thier pathetic heads. give it a rest already. everyone is sick of hearing about it.
12 posted on 02/15/2004 6:12:11 AM PST by suzyq5558 (The demodemons are ANGRY at the administration? so pray tell what is new?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Duffy's stink piece has already been discredited by Deborah Orin, NEW YORK POST.
13 posted on 02/15/2004 6:16:34 AM PST by YaYa123 (@ I Wanna Slap Somebody........ Slap em Hard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Reported by Frank Sikora/Birmingham, Cathy Booth Thomas/Dallas, Jackson Baker/Memphis, Mike Billips/Montgomery and John F. Dickerson and Mark Thompson/Washington

I wonder how much military experience these writers have. Does anyone know how we could find out? I'm guessing it's zip, zero, nada.

14 posted on 02/15/2004 6:16:52 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Gee, our last president lied to avoid the draft and then went to Europe and lead anti-US protests there. Nooo... problem nothing to see here.

Bush did what a lot of people did in the early 1970's --served in the National Guard rather than be drafted and go to Viet Nam. Many of my friends did the same particularly those whose draft lottery numbers were low. Did he use family connections to get a more cushy Guard assignment?--probably, but so did anyone else who had connections. No one seems to mind that Al Gore used his connections to get a relatively cushy journalists assignment in 'Nam.

The hypocracy of the media on this issue just screams.

15 posted on 02/15/2004 6:18:19 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Some Guard veterans have speculated that Bush may have been dodging random drug tests, which were instituted in some military units as early as 1971.

Random drug tests on National Guard units didn't start until the mid 1980's. And they were random, unannounced.

The only time my urine was "tested" was my physical in the late 1980's, and since I had just had major surgery, and had received narcotic pain medications, they decided to omit it.

Scheduled drug testing is ridiculous: You just stay clean for awhile, take a herb to block the THC part of the test, or borrow someone else's urine.

However, pilots do take drug testing. However, Bush's "drug" was alcohol, which clears in 24 hours--which is why alcohol is forbidden up to 24 hours prior to testing.

Drug tests for meth and cocaine were NOT common in the 1970's, and indeed, Amphetemines were not considered "drugs" until truckers wrecked too many trucks from taking Amphetamines to stay awake, again in the early 1970's. So which "drug test" was Bush supposed to have missed?

16 posted on 02/15/2004 6:20:52 AM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John W
"Michael Duffy, Frank Sikora/Birmingham, Cathy Booth Thomas/Dallas, Jackson Baker/Memphis, Mike Billips/Montgomery and John F. Dickerson and Mark Thompson/Washington"

These people are not interested in having anyone know the Ten Commandments - there is one in that says "Thou shalt not bear false witness againgst thy neighbor."

The language may a little quaint, but the meaning is clear. Might make them uncomfortable if they have to think about it a little.
17 posted on 02/15/2004 6:24:28 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
For every one that used his "connections" to get in the NG and avoid Vietnam service, someone else went in their stead. It wasn't a decision without implications, often deadly, for others. I hope those that did use their connections to save their own tails spend a minute or two thinking about it sometime, in the quiet of their family homes that their replacements never had.
18 posted on 02/15/2004 6:31:18 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John W
Lying bastards. They have gone out of their way yo misunderstand and misrepresent Reserve/Guard service. I served 28 years in the Navy and Naval Reserve and let me assure you that resched drills, drills at other stations, and service and AT for the convenience of the military are the rule, not the exception. Beyond that, missing a flight physical is so common as to approach being the rule rather than the exception.

Time Magazine is simply a cabal of lying, dispeptic, invideous Liberals who will do and say anything to hurt Bush.

If they weren't suc h scumbags, they'd be all over Kerry about his treasonous activities with Communist groups. But no, they have their lying agenda.

19 posted on 02/15/2004 6:36:40 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Th divide between the liberal media and normal people is now a chasm.
20 posted on 02/15/2004 6:38:50 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson