Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2004 5:42:33 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John W
What a pathetic pile of drivel.
2 posted on 02/15/2004 5:44:17 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
You forgot "BARF ALERT" in your title.
3 posted on 02/15/2004 5:52:45 AM PST by RockDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Some Guard veterans have speculated that Bush may have been dodging random drug tests, which were instituted in some military units as early as 1971. But there is no evidence to support that; in fact, the dentist who worked on Bush's teeth and who later became the commander of the base medical unit, told TIME that the Alabama Guard did not conduct random drug tests until the 1980s.

So why bring it up if it unless to sow seeds of suspicion? What a vile piece of crap this "reporter" is.

5 posted on 02/15/2004 5:55:04 AM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Another hatchet-job from Time. I do not subscribe for this very reason. I used to subscribe before Ted Turner got on the board.....but things have changed in the war between Americans and liberals....not one cent to liberal causes anymore. Talk about a vast left wing conspiracy.
6 posted on 02/15/2004 5:57:19 AM PST by NetValue (They're not Americans, they're democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
You surely meant to post this on another forum. The extent to which the so-called news media will go to discredit President Bush has become laughable. You guys just keep talking about this until November.

This is the mode of operation for the dims. If you can't find anything creditable, make something up and beat it to death. Only uninformed sheeples will believe this crap.


8 posted on 02/15/2004 6:01:35 AM PST by PROUDAMREP (UNITE FOR BUSH IN '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W; William McKinley; onyx; Texasforever; Tamsey; Miss Marple; gatorbait; MEG33; Iowa Granny
Skimming the surface and skipping over details may be business as usual for a happy-go-lucky 26-year-old, but it's a problem for a President during a winter of discontent. Whether Bush performed his National Guard duties while he was working on the Blount campaign—as well as during much of the year starting in May 1972—was raised in his past campaigns and always fluttered away quickly, an issue regarded as irrelevant after two decades or more. But it has become germane this time in a way it never was before because for the second time in as many months—first on prewar intelligence in Iraq and now on his military record—Bush is caught in a gap between what he has claimed and what he can prove. At the same time, he's gearing up for a fight with a probable Democratic nominee whose record as a Vietnam War hero helps buy him credibility to challenge Bush on his military resume. Bush insists he did his duty in Alabama, but the records—and many memories—don't confirm it. And these days, people are paying a lot closer attention to the President's words.

Sadly, I can't remember which FOX show I was watching last evening, and who was commenting, but when asked about why the increased and repeated attention about the NG records, the commentator emphatically stated the Dem agenda in this is to question, now and forever afterwards, in the 04 campaign, President Bush's "INTEGRITY"...did he lie to us now, as he did then...

So it's not so much an issue of whether he was AWOL, but more of an issue of why he is deceptive.....that's the campaign agenda of the Dems for 04

Bush should beat them all with the bottom of his shoe.

9 posted on 02/15/2004 6:02:15 AM PST by Neets (Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Bush was "nobody" in 1972, and could work with my at my job every single day, and I wouldn't find him remarkable.

Q: Was he the son of someone famous? No.
A: GHWB(his dad) was then just a lowly congressman in a Texas legislature.

10 posted on 02/15/2004 6:04:28 AM PST by ChadGore (Viva Bush. He's EARNED a second term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Iam sick to death of this drivel. I pray that karma wheel smacks all these pathetic buttwipes right upside thier pathetic heads. give it a rest already. everyone is sick of hearing about it.
12 posted on 02/15/2004 6:12:11 AM PST by suzyq5558 (The demodemons are ANGRY at the administration? so pray tell what is new?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Duffy's stink piece has already been discredited by Deborah Orin, NEW YORK POST.
13 posted on 02/15/2004 6:16:34 AM PST by YaYa123 (@ I Wanna Slap Somebody........ Slap em Hard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Reported by Frank Sikora/Birmingham, Cathy Booth Thomas/Dallas, Jackson Baker/Memphis, Mike Billips/Montgomery and John F. Dickerson and Mark Thompson/Washington

I wonder how much military experience these writers have. Does anyone know how we could find out? I'm guessing it's zip, zero, nada.

14 posted on 02/15/2004 6:16:52 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Gee, our last president lied to avoid the draft and then went to Europe and lead anti-US protests there. Nooo... problem nothing to see here.

Bush did what a lot of people did in the early 1970's --served in the National Guard rather than be drafted and go to Viet Nam. Many of my friends did the same particularly those whose draft lottery numbers were low. Did he use family connections to get a more cushy Guard assignment?--probably, but so did anyone else who had connections. No one seems to mind that Al Gore used his connections to get a relatively cushy journalists assignment in 'Nam.

The hypocracy of the media on this issue just screams.

15 posted on 02/15/2004 6:18:19 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
"Michael Duffy, Frank Sikora/Birmingham, Cathy Booth Thomas/Dallas, Jackson Baker/Memphis, Mike Billips/Montgomery and John F. Dickerson and Mark Thompson/Washington"

These people are not interested in having anyone know the Ten Commandments - there is one in that says "Thou shalt not bear false witness againgst thy neighbor."

The language may a little quaint, but the meaning is clear. Might make them uncomfortable if they have to think about it a little.
17 posted on 02/15/2004 6:24:28 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Lying bastards. They have gone out of their way yo misunderstand and misrepresent Reserve/Guard service. I served 28 years in the Navy and Naval Reserve and let me assure you that resched drills, drills at other stations, and service and AT for the convenience of the military are the rule, not the exception. Beyond that, missing a flight physical is so common as to approach being the rule rather than the exception.

Time Magazine is simply a cabal of lying, dispeptic, invideous Liberals who will do and say anything to hurt Bush.

If they weren't suc h scumbags, they'd be all over Kerry about his treasonous activities with Communist groups. But no, they have their lying agenda.

19 posted on 02/15/2004 6:36:40 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Th divide between the liberal media and normal people is now a chasm.
20 posted on 02/15/2004 6:38:50 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Here's the Time magazine biography of Micael Duffy. It says he graduated from college in 1980 and joined Time in 1985 after working at Defense Week magazine. That doesn't leave many windows of opportunity to have served in the military.

http://www.time-planner.com/planner/about_time/bios/senior_editorial_staff/michael_duffy.html

We could have a little fun with the Time magazine reporting style: "Some have speculated that Duffy elected not to serve because he was dodging allegations of . . . . But no evidence has yet come to light to support such a charge."
21 posted on 02/15/2004 6:46:17 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
President George W Bush: possibly (but not able to be proven) AWOL THIRTY YEARS AGO -- currently kicking Islamikaze ass as Commander in Chief

Democrats: anti-America THIRTY YEARS AGO -- currently AWOL in the war on terror.

Who would you vote for to protect your freedom and liberty?

Would you like to know more?

22 posted on 02/15/2004 6:46:37 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Nope, the real questions are here:

("New Questions About John Kerry's Vietnam Service")

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1078071/posts

26 posted on 02/15/2004 7:38:10 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
This pile is still steaming...
27 posted on 02/15/2004 7:44:40 AM PST by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
If the word TIME doesn't explain this pablum, then this should: "Archibald, now a trial attorney in North Carolina..."

Both are professional liars. [I know, I am a bad boy and should be ashamed of myself].

32 posted on 02/15/2004 9:51:51 AM PST by Indie (That earthling has stolen the Imudium 238 explosive space modulator!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson