Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bright Side of Sending Jobs Overseas
NY Times ^ | February 15, 2004 | By EDUARDO PORTER

Posted on 02/15/2004 4:48:01 AM PST by sopwith

FOR most politicians - Democratic or Republican - the issue of outsourcing jobs to faraway countries is a no-brainer: It's bad for the United States economy and it's even worse for their careers, especially in an election year when the work force has just lost more than two million jobs. So it is unsurprising that politicians of both parties ripped into N. Gregory Mankiw, chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, when his annual economic report on Tuesday made precisely the opposite point: that if services like software programming can be done more cheaply in India, it makes sense for companies to procure them there. Outsourcing will ultimately enhance their productivity.

Advertisement

Yet while debate is raging over globalization's costs and benefits, Mr. Mankiw's comments are based on solid, age-old economic arguments. Most economists agree that higher productivity - whether it comes from trade, outsourcing or technology - is good, even when it creates pain for many workers.

"Outsourcing does not reduce the total number of jobs in America," said Robert Reich, who served as labor secretary under President Bill Clinton. "If other countries can do something cheaper we ought to let them do it, and concentrate on what we can do best."

Indeed, despite the hemorrhage of jobs since Mr. Bush took office, the past performance of the American economy - particularly the pattern of job creation and destruction over the past several years - supports Mr. Mankiw's case.

In many ways, the economists' argument for outsourcing is as straightforward as the case for importing products. If an Indian software programmer is paid a tenth of an American's salary, a company that develops software in India will save money and - provided competitors do the same - the price of its software will fall, productivity will rise, the technology will spread, and new jobs will be created to adapt and improve it.

Take cellphones, which 20 years ago were luxury items with the size and weight of a brick. Today - thanks to competition and inexpensive, globalized production - they are cheap, ubiquitous, tiny and packed with a mind-boggling complement of ancillary functions. The industry and the number of jobs have only increased. Global outsourcing also played a big role in the information technology boom of the late 1990's. Personal computers were imported from abroad. Chip companies shipped production overseas. But this outsourcing prompted the creation of new jobs here, on the higher end of the technological spectrum.

A report released last December by Catherine L. Mann of the Institute for International Economics, a Washington research group that backs free trade, calculated that lower costs due to globalized production accounted for 10 percent to 30 percent of the decline in hardware prices during the technology boom of the second half of the 1990's, when computer prices fell 10 percent a year.

The impact of cheap hardware was felt throughout the economy. Ms. Mann calculates that outsourcing boosted productivity growth from 2.5 percent to 2.8 percent a year from 1995 to 2002, a gain that in turn added at least $230 billion to the country's total output of goods and services.

As lower-priced technology flooded the marketplace, it helped generate new jobs, as companies that snapped up computers suddenly required software and workers who could adapt the products to their needs.

Ms. Mann notes that demand for people who knew how to use computers grew by 22 percent through the 1990's boom, twice as fast as overall job creation. "This is despite the fact that outsourcing of computer jobs was going on," Ms. Mann said.

Moreover, lower prices also muted inflation, allowing interest rates to be lower than they otherwise would be - thus boosting investment and growth. And the Asian countries that made computers and chips spent some earnings buying other American services - like legal and financial assistance.

Over all, Ms. Mann notes, "unemployment in the 1990's fell to 4 percent," despite aggressive outsourcing during this period.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: freetrade; leftwingactivists; outsourcing; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: snopercod
"I am perfectly qualifed for those jobs, since I wore a headset and talked to people thru a microphone when I used to launch space shuttles."

So it comes down to: talk through the clown head or talk to the head clown!

Seriously, though, thank you for the fine work you did. For every glorified astronaut there is a legion of people behind the scenes that get them there.
21 posted on 02/15/2004 2:15:54 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
Thanks for that. Like I wrote in my resignation letter, it was an honor to have been a small part of the manned space program.
22 posted on 02/15/2004 3:00:21 PM PST by snopercod (When the people are ready, a master will appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Well, I quit, so no sympathy is in order.
23 posted on 02/15/2004 3:02:07 PM PST by snopercod (When the people are ready, a master will appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Dare I ask why?
24 posted on 02/15/2004 3:04:59 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
I quit for many reasons, some of which are not mentioned in my my resignation letter.
I am grateful to have been able to work in the US Space Shuttle program for the last 13+ years of my life. We Americans have been able to accomplish what others thought impossible only a few years ago -- providing reliable access to space in a reusable spacecraft that could maneuver, deliver and retrieve payloads, and then fly back and land on a runway. We accomplished this goal as Americans have always done it, by using our abilities to “push the outside of the envelope” in the search for technical perfection in the advancement of human knowledge.

I am truly proud to have been some small part of that effort.

ecently, however, it has become obvious that while those of us here at KSC have been doing what we have always done – safely processing and launching the Shuttles -- the goals and mission of the program have been redirected.

This once-proud program, which sparked the imaginations of millions of Americans such as myself, has seemingly been reduced to some kind of pathetic international welfare agency, transferring billions of US taxpayer dollars directly away from our professed mission and into the accounts of whichever foreign “partners” are favored by our current president.

These so-called “partners” have siphoned off American taxpayer money for purposes know only to themselves and provided nothing of value in return to the US taxpayers. The hardware and services that they cynically promised to provide have not materialized and probably never will.

Thanks to the policies of our current administration, the US Space Shuttle program now finds itself being held hostage to the whims of a miserable socialist country run by a declining alcoholic buffoon and a communist legislature.

How could our so-called leaders have let this happen?

Worst of all, it seems that seats on the few remaining Space Shuttle flights are now being handed out in return for political favors or to support causes unrelated to the exploration of space and other than the furtherance of our technical knowledge. Besides being an affront to those of us who once loved the space program, this new policy is a slap in the face to all those dedicated astronauts who have spent years (in some cases 30 years) honing their talents to better serve their love of space exploration.

These new trends are (or should be) alarming to all of us who believe that ability should be the sole criterion in Astronaut selection, and science or “envelope-pushing” should be the sole criteria for mission planning. The American Manned Space Program cannot and will not survive on any other terms.

In summary, I find that I can no longer allow myself to participate in what has become a cheap travesty of the former glory of the US Manned Space Program.

It is with great sadness, therefore, that I tender my resignation...


25 posted on 02/15/2004 3:18:22 PM PST by snopercod (When the people are ready, a master will appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
You know, you should write a non-fiction book on this subject. You might make a fortune from it.
26 posted on 02/15/2004 3:30:36 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Beautifully stated. Now the SOB's, despite never delivering their station component (costing us three times more than if we had just done it ourselves in the first place) have the sheer gall to ask if they can be part of the next mission.

Let me roll the donut they can...you get it. Hope they choke on their caviar.
27 posted on 02/15/2004 3:39:10 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Another bright point about sending jobs overseas is that more Americans get to travel and see the world.
28 posted on 02/15/2004 3:53:49 PM PST by Edmund Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: contessa machiaveli
Do I detect a bit of "class envy"? That's very conservative of you, now, isn't it?
29 posted on 02/16/2004 3:48:32 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (Shameless way to get you to view my FR homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Well then, that means that no one is getting no jobs no where.
30 posted on 02/16/2004 3:50:20 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
sorry,no cigar. if there's any class envy, it's the other way around.
you see i'm the one with a sports car and a nice house in the burbs...mortgage paid in full. i have a job i love because i work from home doing very specialized work and i choose the amount of hours i want to work (which is usually 25 per week max). my husband is an attorney (not trial).
why do you assume if someone actually cares about certain issues they're either envious or liberal?
rethink your stereotypes and stop listening to rush.
31 posted on 02/16/2004 4:48:53 AM PST by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: contessa machiaveli
It (the post) walked and sounded like a duck, so I assumed it was a duck. Thank you for making the clarification and setting my assumption straight.
32 posted on 02/16/2004 5:01:26 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (Shameless way to get you to view my FR homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Well then, that means that no one is getting no jobs no where.

Exactly, for native born citizens, it is genocide by starvation and slow torture.

33 posted on 02/16/2004 6:14:41 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
i should have known a southern gentleman would be gracious enough to apologize. accepted.
34 posted on 02/16/2004 6:24:16 AM PST by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson