KERRY IS TOAST! - Nichols Notes(Hillary Gets Ready to Spread the Jam!)

Larry Nichols Notes ^ | February 14, 2004 | Larry Nichols

[Joy Angela]

>>Excuse me, but how can Hilary run, let alone win, when she has refused and will continue to refuse to answer questions from the press? Even if she should relent, the American public will NOT like what she has to say and will be put off by her calculatingly cold style. Hillary is NOT inevitable but it seems that something about her causes some to feel helpless. Happy Valentine's Day.<<


The tactics you mention are her Keys to Victory.

Avoid, lie, deny, skirt-the-issues,
scream, yell, distract, attack.

Rules-For-Radicals

From The Most-Radical of All...

Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton

[tenthirteen]

I thoroughly agree that Hilary will not win one Southern state. The American public has had their fill of the Clintons, and down here in the South there is a special animus for them.

I've worked in several Federal campaigns here, and I really believe that the right atmosphere does not exist for a Hilary end-run. I can almost say that it will not ever be right for their shenanigans; the Churches are still strong, and the hunting class is solid. I could be wrong, but I think not.

[carl in alaska]

I agree that the Hildabeast won't run this year, but instead will wait for the open White House in 2008. But I don't think she wants to be VP, because that would delay her shot at the Presidency until 2012. Instead she'll work quietly behind the scenes to undermine the Democrat's candidate so that Bush wins this year. Hildabeast needs another four years to clean up her image and let some people forget about all those "I don't recall" answers under oath to Grand Juries.

[Southack]

Hillary can't beat Giuliani in her own "home" state of New York...not post 9/11. Shoot, she only beat no-name Lazio with 54% for her 2000 Senate seat back in the pre-9/11 era.

Nor can she win in 2004 any of the states that Gore lost in 2000.

And all that Bush has to do is win again in 2004 the same states that he won in 2000.

But Bush is doing more than just winning his same states again in 2004. Contrary to the pure propaganda in the press, Bush is ahead by more than 5% in the polls in formerly Gore (2000) states such as Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Bush has an even chance of winning Oregon in 2004, and right now he is *ahead* of the Democrats in New York!

Bush is bursting all of the fund raising records, too. He's also got amazing name recognition now, something that he didn't have back in 2000. Nor can the Dems claim that Bush is too inexperienced any more, much less if they run a 1 term Senator against him.

What the Dems needed to have done was to have run a Presidential candidate in 2004 who could potentially win some of Bush's old 2000 states, such as Zell Miller who could potentially win Georgia, or Breaux who could potentially win Louisiana. Hillary as a VP candidate would have kept their liberals on their plantation while their Conservative Presidential candidate would have had a chance against Bush in the key Southern and Midwestern states.

Because if the Dems don't win any of those states that they lost back in 2000, then they lose again. California and New York simply won't win the Presidency any longer.

The closest that they've now got to anyone who can do that is Edwards for South Carolina, but he couldn't even win re-election to his own Senate seat there!

So Hillary is *not* winning the Presidency in 2004. She could be a losing VP candidate, but that's about it.

And if she runs for President in 2008, then we'll run Giuliani against her and beat her then, as well.

[Joy Angela]

What stance do you think has more influence over
stopping a Hillary Run?

1) Boo-hooing the idea and saying "no way" would she
win any states.

2) Standing Together, no matter what it takes, no
matter where we have to go, no matter what we have to do to STOP HILLARY.

Denying the possiblity only empowers her beast.

"Practicing the Art of Making the Impossible Possible"
"is" Hillary's Motto.

And it has been...for a very, long time.

[Bullish]

Your take on it makes far more sense than Larrys'.

[PatL]

Since the regular media will not question Hillary, it is up to us. We need to have our journalists at every campaign stop to question her.
We know she has a temper and doesn't like to be crossed. We need to push her until she self-destructs.
This is a battle we can't afford to lose.

[PJ-Comix]

One thing about Edwards. You will NEVER find him in a sex scandal with a woman. I guarantee it.

[Meredith]

Barbara Olsen was [is] a herione of mine. Everything you say about Hitlerly is true and everything that can be done to thwart her should be done. But, call me naive and "new" but if I truly BELIEVED that Hillary could work her [black] magic in ALL fifty states, I might be too frozen to ACT!

[Joy Angela]

Freeps are very successful too.

Using humor and "street theater" to
belittle her is a very powerful weapon.

Even her own leftists laugh at the Clintons if
you play it just right.

The Clintons are cartoon-ish, because they are FRAUDS.

Everything about them, Everything about Bill and
Hillary is aimed at defrauding America.

Peel back the mask...

And what you see isn't very pretty.

No matter how much botox Hillary uses,
the REAL Hillary is a very ugly sight.

[Joy Angela]

I feel that way sometimes.

I say a prayer sometimes. Letting God know
we love our country, we need His Intervention.

May we be empowered.

[John Lenin]

Never forget this, Hillary is no Bill Clinton. She has the personality of a rattlesnake where as Bubba could talk you out of your shirt. People give this woman way too much credit for what she really is.

[paul51]

I doubt hilliary could win as many states as kerry. She certainly has more baggage, is more polarizing and can't deal with the media like kerry the bs'er can. I don't think kerry is toast but I do think he can't beat Pres. Bush

[BigSkyFreeper]

And all that Bush has to do is win again in 2004 the same states that he won in 2000.

Bush has to win all the states he carried in 2000, and to keep it from being a hair-thin margin, pick up several more. What was it? 38 last time? There's no reason he should be able to pick up, say, 45 states. I won't predict the impossible, that being, a total landslide, but 45 states is an achievable goal. My gut feelings says that all the states that went into Bush's column in 2000 will vote for Bush in November. New York or California going red for Bush would certainly be great!

[Meredith]

Amen to that!!!

[malia]

What if he is a resident of another country?

[John Lenin]

11. Redistricting

President Bush has gained a small yet concrete advantage heading into the elections this year. Red states in 2000 netted Bush 271 electoral votes. This year those same states would give him 278. In other words, he could lose a state like New Hampshire, Nevada or West Virginia and win anyway. Even losing a larger state such as Louisiana or Colorado would produce a 269-269 tie.

[Joy Angela]

"What she is"
has gotten her where she is.

The Clinton's have been positions-of-power
since the 1980's.

If Hillary Clinton wins the Presidency, they
will be in a Position-of-National-Power from 1992-2012....

Can America Survive
The Clintons'?

Will America Survive the Executive Orders written
during Bill's term?

Power of this intensity belongs to Dictators and Kings.

[Chani]

"One thing about Edwards. You will NEVER find him in a sex scandal with a woman. I guarantee it."


Are you saying there's a possibility of his having a sex scandal with a MAN, then?

[Meredith]

Hilary still has all those files that disappeared mysteriously.