Skip to comments.
U.S. IMPOSES Nuke Commitment DEADLINE for IRAN
AP ^
| Feb. 14, 2004
Posted on 02/14/2004 10:38:50 AM PST by nuconvert
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:38:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: deadline; iaea; iran; mrnu; nukes; statedept; un; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
02/14/2004 10:38:56 AM PST
by
nuconvert
To: DoctorZIn; cyborg; GeronL; Pro-Bush; GOPJ
PONG
2
posted on
02/14/2004 10:44:54 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: nuconvert
What will Bush do if they don't meet the deadline?
3
posted on
02/14/2004 10:47:07 AM PST
by
cyborg
To: cyborg
Good question.
It seems for now that in that case, it will be turned over to U.N. Security Council. Maybe he'll allow that process for a short time and then take matters into his own hands. (I Hope)
4
posted on
02/14/2004 10:53:08 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: nuconvert
you're right... I see it going the same way. Hopefully US won't get as far as Iraq.
5
posted on
02/14/2004 10:53:58 AM PST
by
cyborg
To: cyborg
OIF II ???
To: cyborg
I don't think Iran wants to find out. Couple this with our putting sanctions on Syria.
As they say something is up.
7
posted on
02/14/2004 10:57:56 AM PST
by
Dog
To: cyborg
8
posted on
02/14/2004 10:59:22 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: cyborg
What will Bush do if they don't meet the deadline? A tyrant a year. That's all we ask...
9
posted on
02/14/2004 11:01:35 AM PST
by
null and void
(Yes on SB 1160 = No on your re-election)
To: Dog; SubMareener; All
I don't think they want to find out either. They didn't believe Bush would go into Iraq and stay there. I think they're looking at Lybia's situation too. We'll see what happens.
10
posted on
02/14/2004 11:02:33 AM PST
by
cyborg
To: Dog
"As they say something is up." I think we'll see US troop incursions into Pakistan before anything serious happens with Iran.
11
posted on
02/14/2004 11:03:42 AM PST
by
blam
To: nuconvert
Why would sanctions work in Iran if they didn't work in Iraq?
Or is GW Bush saying sanctions did work in Iraq?
I don't get where he's coming from.
12
posted on
02/14/2004 11:25:05 AM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
To: Finalapproach29er
"Why would sanctions work in Iran if they didn't work in Iraq?"
They won't.
They haven't.
The regime will absolutely NOT be told what they can or cannot do. Especially by the U.S.
13
posted on
02/14/2004 11:39:30 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: Finalapproach29er
Why would sanctions work in Iran if they didn't work in Iraq? Or is GW Bush saying sanctions did work in Iraq? I don't get where he's coming from.I think President Bush's administration is starting up the groundwork with the goal of eliminating unconventional weapons from the hands of unstable governments. This is like giving notice to Syria and Iran that we know what they are doing. Who knows, maybe in ten years or so we are gonna have to invade and occupy those countries too.
On the other hand, I am greatly encouraged by Libya's admission of possession of WMD and the voluntary removal of them recently...
14
posted on
02/14/2004 11:49:30 AM PST
by
John123
(Ketchup boy has been a poodle to rich women for the past 33 years!)
To: John123
"Who knows, maybe in ten years or so we are gonna have to invade and occupy those countries too."
Something will happen way before that. They will have a change in government in Iran way before that. Think more like within a year.
15
posted on
02/14/2004 12:01:17 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: John123
I don't think we have 10 years thanks to this KAHN guy in Pakistan(s) help.
16
posted on
02/14/2004 2:04:15 PM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
To: nuconvert
Despite promises to the contrary, Boucher said, Iran has continued to hide information related to weapons from the IAEA.
Not cooperating, that's my take.
17
posted on
02/14/2004 11:04:23 PM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: McGavin999; freedom44; Eala; AdmSmith; dixiechick2000; onyx; Pro-Bush; Valin; Pan_Yans Wife; ...
Ping!
18
posted on
02/15/2004 6:35:26 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
(Either you are with us or you are with the REGIME)
To: F14 Pilot
Thanks for the ping.
Good news.
19
posted on
02/15/2004 7:00:25 AM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Your friend is your needs answered. --- Kahlil Gibran)
To: F14 Pilot
Thanks for the ping!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson