To: kattracks
Yep. Just as I had predicted, the snowfall of proof didn't sway the Democrats. It only "raised more questions".
2 posted on
02/13/2004 11:53:04 PM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(The South isn't Bush's backyard; The South is Bush's front yard)
To: BigSkyFreeper
I'm totally sick of the dims and their petty presstitutes. In fact, their are all becoming very shameful, again. This story is the header on the Excite home page. Disgusting.
To: BigSkyFreeper
Shocking they aren't swayed. < /sarcasm >
27 posted on
02/14/2004 5:38:25 AM PST by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have choosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: BigSkyFreeper
who really gives a rats ass what democrats think!they're never happy anyhow!
34 posted on
02/14/2004 6:46:50 AM PST by
fatal
To: BigSkyFreeper
"It remains to be seen if these newest documents will provide any answers."
In other words, until our polling shows this has begun to backfire on us.
35 posted on
02/14/2004 6:48:43 AM PST by
Let's Roll
("First, we kill all the lawyers" - Henry VI, Part II)
To: BigSkyFreeper
"Each revelation of material from the Bush White House has raised more questions than it has answered," said Democratic National Committee spokeswoman Debra DeShong. "It remains to be seen if these newest documents will provide any answers." I hope the White House will stop releasing material and move along now. The Dems don't want to be convinced, so they won't be, but every release of documents is an opportunity to ask more questions, and keep the idea that President Bush received preferential treatment in the news.
39 posted on
02/14/2004 7:03:16 AM PST by
Amelia
(Pop-culture impaired)
To: BigSkyFreeper
"Each revelation of material from the Bush White House has raised more questions than it has answered," said Democratic National Committee spokeswoman Debra DeShong."There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is contempt prior to investigation." Spencer
Nothing could possibly satisfy these hyenas, since the purpose of the exercise is to keep up the attack and have the victim waste time and energy on a defense. Truth is an inconvenient obstacle, nothing more. Further, the "story" keeps focus away from other things, like the self-destruction of the dimwits' candidates and their all-too real scandals.
Bush's biggest mistake was not to tell them collectively to "go pound sand" and refuse further discussion. It would then become a non-story.
Why Bush and many of us fueled the attack by giving it credence is beyond me. Other than expressing puzzlement at the goings on, I refuse to play.
48 posted on
02/14/2004 7:47:50 AM PST by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
That is the intent of the 9/11 investigation, as per the Judicial Memos being held without hearing by Sargent at Arms Pickles.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson